@tigerbenji said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1062727) said:
@Cultured_Bogan You are spot on mate, she was doing a great job.
Marina learned a lot on the job. She also was the chair during the JT fiasco and I believe her judgement during that period was clouded.
She handled Clearys defection admirably and, I was really disappointed by the board not backing her over the ambassador' s role.
Look, I'm not anti-Marina at all, but as noted she was here for 4.5 years *including* the firing of Potter, the hiring of Taylor, the firing of Taylor, the ousting of Farah, the hiring of Ivan, the defection of Ivan, the Farah salary cap penalty.
Fans are very quick to point fingers at Pascoe and now O'Farrell for either being around during these crises, or not making enough noise when crises are occurring. Marina was chair when Pascoe was hired.
I'm sure Marina did do a good job, but the club's track record during her tenure was ordinary. The club's track record during all tenures has been ordinary!
I cannot say, from the outside, how well or otherwise she truly performed and how much success was attributable to her, or issues not attributable to her.
So IMO the same arguments that people level at Pascoe, for example, can apply equally to Marina. Or, like myself, just accept that most of us don't really known what Go / Pascoe / O'Farrell can really be credited or discredited for from the outside.
Probably shared blame, but either both the board and the CEO or one of them should be accountable.
People love to rattle off how well we are travelling off the field but I can see no difference in the club since Go or Pascoe turned up.