TheDaBoss
Well-known member
The Lurker....... struggling for any relavance in the rugby league world atm
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@jirskyr said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064407) said:@ElleryHanley said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064338) said:The bottom line here is that Matterson is in absolutely no way a shirker. The bloke worked his guts out all season, carrying the pack behind the worst front row in the comp. It is hardly surprising if it wore him out.
I'm not saying he is a shirker and I was in no way displeased with his 2019 season, in fact rather the opposite.
My point is that if the Lurker comments were true, that Matto had some issue with being asked to play, then I wouldn't accept that - you do what the team needs. You said hardly any forwards play 80 mins every week, but on the contrary, many do.
In terms of whether or not Matto is being asked to take hitups on the back of weak first efforts, that's a complicated idea and potentially impossible to measure. Obviously, no stats are kept publicly on who takes hitup 1, hitup 2 etc. Matto spent a lot of his season on the edge and not the middle, so there's an argument to be made that in fact his workload was independent of the props because he was receiving the ball on shift plays.
I actually believe however there is data to refute your assumption that our other forwards are useless. Tigers are #1 in comp in average post-contact metres (you can no longer take totals because the finals teams all have an extra match played), #1 in average all runs and #5 in average all-run metres gained. I am certain that Matto is integral to those figures (he is #16 in the comp for average post-contact m) , but as a whole, the team took more runs than any other, made more metres in contact and were top 5 in overall yardage. That simply cannot be the hallmark of the worst front row in the comp.
@Earl said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064445) said:@Geo said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064443) said:lol…so says the Lurker…
How much do these guys get right ?
@ElleryHanley said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064453) said:>But when was the last time you saw a Tigers prop skittle three blokes and break the opposition D line way open?
Every team in the finals has as least one beast enforcer prop…most have 2-3 beasts in their pack. They are all in the semis…
@jirskyr said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064407) said:@ElleryHanley said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064338) said:The bottom line here is that Matterson is in absolutely no way a shirker. The bloke worked his guts out all season, carrying the pack behind the worst front row in the comp. It is hardly surprising if it wore him out.
I'm not saying he is a shirker and I was in no way displeased with his 2019 season, in fact rather the opposite.
My point is that if the Lurker comments were true, that Matto had some issue with being asked to play, then I wouldn't accept that - you do what the team needs. You said hardly any forwards play 80 mins every week, but on the contrary, many do.
In terms of whether or not Matto is being asked to take hitups on the back of weak first efforts, that's a complicated idea and potentially impossible to measure. Obviously, no stats are kept publicly on who takes hitup 1, hitup 2 etc. Matto spent a lot of his season on the edge and not the middle, so there's an argument to be made that in fact his workload was independent of the props because he was receiving the ball on shift plays.
I actually believe however there is data to refute your assumption that our other forwards are useless. Tigers are #1 in comp in average post-contact metres (you can no longer take totals because the finals teams all have an extra match played), #1 in average all runs and #5 in average all-run metres gained. I am certain that Matto is integral to those figures (he is #16 in the comp for average post-contact m) , but as a whole, the team took more runs than any other, made more metres in contact and were top 5 in overall yardage. That simply cannot be the hallmark of the worst front row in the comp.
@Jimmy said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064467) said:So matto is still active on ig and dropping quotes via his story....hmmmm
@Jimmy said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064474) said:@GNR4LIFE ig meaning Instagram....story is a form of posts on his profile page
@jirskyr said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064457) said:@ElleryHanley said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064453) said:>But when was the last time you saw a Tigers prop skittle three blokes and break the opposition D line way open?
Every team in the finals has as least one beast enforcer prop…most have 2-3 beasts in their pack. They are all in the semis…
I thought Josh Aloiai was quite effective in breaking defences but he couldn't do it consistently 2019, either through minutes or injury. He's getting there as a forward, it's just a bit of a journey.
I felt that the Tigers end-year forwards rotation was solid, esp in defence, and there is a lot I like about Oli Clarke, Huth, ET and Twal in terms of line speed and controlling the ruck. Garner really came on in attack. They are mostly really quite inexperienced and can grow a lot as footballers.
But I totally agree we would like an enforcer in the mould of JWH or Papalii, to really cause some random damage. Making metres and making tackles in a predictable, dependable fashion is good, but randomly being able to break down the opposition can separate the best sides from the middle. I'm talking the odd big hit, the barnstorming run at the try line. These things break down defences not just when they occur, but across the match in the fear of them occurring. It's the same with Tedesco - he does half of his work off the ball now, because oppositions watch him so closely, it opens the game up for all his team-mates.
Would love to sign a bloke like Papalii, I reckon when he's switched on he's arguably the best prop in the comp, and 2019 he really peaked during Origin and has carried that form into the finals. But I'm also pleased enough for Canberra that they've been able to keep him down there and not be picked off by Broncos or Roosters. Ryan James might be more of a bargain buy, if he can regain fitness and form.
Jai Arrow is a good kid - not an enforcer at the moment, though I wouldn't turn him down. There's something to be said about the Titans side however, with really good forwards like Wallace, Proctor, Arrow, young guys like Fotuaika and experienced though currently injured props Boyd and James, but they were really a shambles 2019.
@balmain-boy said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064461) said:You do realise that those stats are largely meaningless, and are indicative of our speed in attack and the opposition’s line speed? If the other team have good line speed and get up in our faces (as they usually do) and our players are nearly always standing still when they receive the ball to take a hit up, then by default nearly all the metres made will be post contact. If we had forwards building up a head of steam or could routinely get quick play the balls then we might make more metres before meeting the defensive line.
@jirskyr said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064487) said:@balmain-boy said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064461) said:You do realise that those stats are largely meaningless, and are indicative of our speed in attack and the opposition’s line speed? If the other team have good line speed and get up in our faces (as they usually do) and our players are nearly always standing still when they receive the ball to take a hit up, then by default nearly all the metres made will be post contact. If we had forwards building up a head of steam or could routinely get quick play the balls then we might make more metres before meeting the defensive line.
Well the stats aren't meaningless, because whether or not the defensive line gets up on us quickly, it still matters if you can make metres after contact. In other words, better to make metres in contact than not to. If the opposition has good line speed, then likely they have good line speed against every team and not just Tigers, therefore PCM is meaningful.
However, you appear to have overlooked that we were also #5 in all-run metres gained, (average per match). So post-contact metres are best and all-run metres are Top-5. Whether or not our total yardage includes mostly uncontested run or post-contact run metres, overall it's pretty good compared to the competition.
So no, don't really think they are meaningless at all. Either we make good yards pre and post contact, or we make all our yards post-contact (your argument), but nonetheless we finished 5th in all-run metres.
I just don’t get how so many people on here can complain how our pack gets outmuscled and dominated so often, yet are happy to push random stats to say we’re better than everyone else. We’re not. We kick from inside our half more than any other team in the comp, we struggle to get out of our end more than any team in the comp and making metres is our biggest struggle at present.
That just isn't true. 5TH IN THE COMP AVERAGE ALL-RUN METRES.
If you are going to start spouting stuff that this is all down to the backs etc., I don't have the distribution between forwards and backs, and perhaps it doesn't matter so long as somebody makes metres. Parra get huge metres out of their back 3, nobody seems to mind.
The pack absolutely has lots of room for improvement. But also, I honestly believe people have pre-conceived ideas about what Tigers do and don't do based only on their memory of watching games. Huth is a pillow, Matterson is a beast, Twal gets dominated etc. You have to go look at the data and see what the data also tells you.
A random stat is 1-1 strips or "# wins on a Saturday night". But others like all-run metres, missed tackles, points scored - they do speak volumes about actual measured output.
@Jimmy said in [Matterson unhappy at Tigers?](/post/1064477) said:@GNR4LIFE oh ryt ryt I’m talking teenager my bad horrible language to master.....pics of him with disabled kids through the tigers days out linking other profiles on each pic which I’d assume are the ones who said such quotes to him...like thanfull for the year quotes