earl
Well-known member
I'm coming guys. More quality information on the way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@swag_tiger said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454417) said:I'm getting vaccinated tomorrow. I better get my lollipop after.
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454387) said:@the_third said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454374) said:https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e3.htm
Delta reduces RNA vaccine effectiveness
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/messenger-rna-covid-vaccines-66-effective-against-delta-us-study/news-story/a77dd989ef021acfef3e80ae705be9be
Perfect example.
The efficacy of the vaccine has not changed. The disease has. The vaccine remains 91% effective against the alpha variant, it is unchanged. It is less effective (67% in this article, 88% according to New England Journal of Medicine) against the Delta variant.
EDIT: @the_third I want to make it clear, Im not disagreeing with you, of course the vaccine isnt as effective against the Delta, Ive posted many times scientific studies showing this. I am making an assumption that you posted this after I said to Earl he was wrong about vaccine efficacy declining in Israel. Earl was making the point that the *Pfizer* vaccine *in itself* had stopped working and the efficacy of the *Pfizer vaccine itself* was declining in Israel. Simply not true, Delta became the dominant variant.
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454428) said:I posted a really good paper previously on the effect of COVID on children. There are currently some health experts/epidemiologists arguing that teenagers do not need to be vaccinated. The argument here is that the risk to them is so low and we are in a pandemic and therefore the best option is to vaccinate the poor countries rather than low risk demographics.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721859/
This paper here articulates the risk of dying from COVID compared to accidental deaths.
>The estimated age-specific IFR is very low for children and younger adults (e.g., 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25) but increases progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.4% at age 65, 4.6% at age 75, and 15% at age 85. Moreover, our results indicate that about 90% of the variation in population IFR across geographical locations reflects differences in the age composition of the population and the extent to which relatively vulnerable age groups were exposed to the virus.
This is basically stating that your risk profile increases significantly as you age. There is no specific information on children because the grouping is below the age of 25.
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454428) said:I posted a really good paper previously on the effect of COVID on children. There are currently some health experts/epidemiologists arguing that teenagers do not need to be vaccinated. The argument here is that the risk to them is so low and we are in a pandemic and therefore the best option is to vaccinate the poor countries rather than low risk demographics.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721859/
This paper here articulates the risk of dying from COVID compared to accidental deaths.
>The estimated age-specific IFR is very low for children and younger adults (e.g., 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25) but increases progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.4% at age 65, 4.6% at age 75, and 15% at age 85. Moreover, our results indicate that about 90% of the variation in population IFR across geographical locations reflects differences in the age composition of the population and the extent to which relatively vulnerable age groups were exposed to the virus.
This is basically stating that your risk profile increases significantly as you age. There is no specific information on children because the grouping is below the age of 25.
@hobbo1 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454369) said:@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454364) said:@hobbo1 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454361) said:5150 .. the scientist
Earl … disgraced former GP
Have I got that correct ?
Apologies in advance if not lol
Earl isnt claiming he was a GP is he?
His father was .. apparently
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454403) said:919 cases today....was hoping yesterdays drop was a sign that it was turning around
@finesttigers said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454441) said:@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454403) said:919 cases today....was hoping yesterdays drop was a sign that it was turning around
Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon: ‘If We Stop Testing, We’d Have Fewer Cases’ 
content://com.android.chrome.FileProvider/images/screenshot/16298598182791629725617.jpg
@madge said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454419) said:I've been fully vaccinated for about a month now.
@thedaboss said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454448) said:@madge said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454419) said:I've been fully vaccinated for about a month now.
I will be in about 2 weeks
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454433) said:@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454428) said:I posted a really good paper previously on the effect of COVID on children. There are currently some health experts/epidemiologists arguing that teenagers do not need to be vaccinated. The argument here is that the risk to them is so low and we are in a pandemic and therefore the best option is to vaccinate the poor countries rather than low risk demographics.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7721859/
This paper here articulates the risk of dying from COVID compared to accidental deaths.
>The estimated age-specific IFR is very low for children and younger adults (e.g., 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25) but increases progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.4% at age 65, 4.6% at age 75, and 15% at age 85. Moreover, our results indicate that about 90% of the variation in population IFR across geographical locations reflects differences in the age composition of the population and the extent to which relatively vulnerable age groups were exposed to the virus.
This is basically stating that your risk profile increases significantly as you age. There is no specific information on children because the grouping is below the age of 25.
NOT...having a go at you Earl, but that data was collected prior to September 2020 and therefore is based on the Alpha variant. It would be interesting and useful to see how it compares with the Delta variant which based on reports seems to be impacting younger people more.
Unrelated to your data here Earl but I am genuinely interested in actual data of the impact of Delta on the young because due to the fact that vacciantions have been prioritised by age, it is a certainty that proportionally the percentage of younger people infected MUST rise but not necessarily due to an increase in the ability of Delta to infect or impact young people. That fact doesnt exclude it though.
@cochise said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454432) said:This is from NSW Health staff training.
@papacito said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454409) said:What a shocking number today.
For all the hype about vaccine take up, that's a bad result in a largely unvaccinated population.
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454333) said:You also owe me an apology and a correction for stating that I posted that the vaccines dont work.