@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454430) said:
@demps said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454426) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1454387) said:
I said to Earl he was wrong about vaccine efficacy declining in Israel. Earl was making the point that the *Pfizer* vaccine *in itself* had stopped working and the efficacy of the *Pfizer vaccine itself* was declining in Israel. Simply not true, Delta became the dominant variant.
Semantics. Thanks for admitting you got it wrong.
Not semantics at all and I will prove again why I am not wrong but you continually lie and prove yourself to be a liar and ignorant.
>Is Delta COVID ?
Technically, it is SARS-CoV2-B.1.617.2. , The Alpha is SARS-CoV2-B.1.1.7. Can you spot a difference? They are different.
>Did the effectiveness drop significantly ?
Thank you for your question, and thank you for your ongoing dedication to proving your obstinate ignorance. Let me see if I can help you with that.
To answer directly, **no**, the effectiveness of the vaccine did **not** drop significantly.
Let me try to explain this to you simply. In Israel, UK, Aus, US, both Alpha and Delta co-exist. If in June 2020, you and I were locked in small unventilated room in Israel and you were fully vaccinated with Pfizer and I was infectious with SARS-CoV2-B.1.1.7. (Alpha) what is the chance that you would catch it? The answer is you have a 9% chance of catching it. If am locked in that same room with you today and you are vaccinated fully with Pfizer and I am infectious with SARS-CoV2-B.1.1.7. what is the chance of you catching it? It is still 9%, it hasnt changed. If however I have SARS-CoV2-B.1.617.2. then that risk of catching it increases significantly to 12% according to New England Journal of Medicine, significantly higher in that CDC report the Third posted.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108891
The effectiveness of the vaccine hasnt changed, the disease did.
Regardless when you made that point originally you were arguing relative efficacy between Pfizer and AZ and AZ is not available in Israel.
>Have you read the research recently stating how the effectiveness of both vaccines are about equal.
Point out which research you are referring to (with links).
I have repeatedly posted research from NEw England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet, The British Medical Journal and Public Health England showing that there is almost no difference between the effectiveness of both vaccines *against hospitalisation or death* however there is an almost 20% difference between the two vaccines in effectiveness in stopping infection. For the millionth time, here is some of my data, happy for you to post yours contradicting mine.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2108891
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/vaccines-highly-effective-against-hospitalisation-from-delta-variant
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/investigation-of-novel-sars-cov-2-variant-variant-of-concern-20201201
https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n1960
>The whole point is that you had no idea what efficacy was and you got it wrong and oh so wrong.
Earl, if you repeat a lie over and over and over again, it doesnt make it true. What it *does* do is make me post long lists of actual data and studies from such nuffies as the British Medical Journal, New England Journal of Medicine, Public Health England and The Lancet (all above for the millionth time) clearly demonstrating the efficacy of both vaccines....clearly. Yet you just repeat this rubbish that I dont understand efficacy. You watched a Vox video and misunderstood it. You really are looking silly here mate.
Why did you continue to go against the health advice which Dr Chant clearly states regularly ? Are you stating you know better than Dr Chant ?
Seriously what are you talking about? What advice am I going against?
Have you admitted your special podcast that you pushed so hard on here has been taken down from YouTube due to being construed as misinformation ?
Earl, serious question. What was that podcast about? Do you know what that podcast was about?
I know you dont, so I'll help you out. It was about Tess Lawries meta analysis on Ivermectin (a drug which the clinical evidence shows is not statistically effective). You know the meta analysis I am talking about? Its the same meta analysis that **you** so proudly shared in this thread and made triumphant declarations about. Are you pushing misinformation?
>Just to be clear the whole podcast was taken down because it was dodgy science.
My main concern at the time was the fact that the podcast was removed. Can you point me in the direction of the reason it was taken down?
Was Tess Lawries meta analysis "dodgy science" when you promoted it here?