Aesopian
Well-known member
@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1303346) said:@aesopian said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1303344) said:@tilllindemann said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1303341) said:@aesopian said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1303336) said:@tilllindemann said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1303234) said:@tiger5150 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1303233) said:https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/theory-that-covid19-leaked-from-a-lab-in-wuhan-china-still-under-investigation-who-admits/news-story/8dc7dc6974cec1ed6422381abc9f0325
WHO are a joke at this stage.
A specialist cited by the ABC this morning also implied the lab statement was as much about politics as anything else:
"They quickly dismissed possible unnatural origins, which was expected, given the political sensitivities, not just for China, but for the world," Raina MacIntyre, an infectious disease specialist at the University of New South Wales, said.
**She questioned what evidence was presented to fully rule out the theory."**
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-14/china-coronavirus-who-investigation-comes-up-empty/13144756
She was also rather critical of the WHO investigation more broadly.
Don't you also need substantial evidence to prove a theory!? Of which in this case it's more about finding blame rather than facts.
It's pretty obvious now that unless DA WHO concludes that it started in a lab then this part of the world will call any conclusions a scam and claim everyone's been paid off.
Personal bias and preconceptions won't allow this the transparency it deserves.
Eh? I never claimed it started in a lab.
Not saying you did. Referring to the person from the article.
Neither did the person from the article. They are however questioning the motives of those trying to rule out the lab leak hypothesis without falsifying evidence.
Didn't say they did either. But she did refer to the 'Lab Leak Theory'... She questioned what evidence was presented to fully rule out the Theory...
I'm getting confused now, you say Hypothesis, she says Theory. Can't be both