hank37w
Well-known member
@earl said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1516802) said:@eyeofthetiger-0 said in [Coronavirus Outbreak](/post/1516800) said:Sorry guys but please enlighten me, the Newcastle cluster are they all vaxed people? If they are, wasn’t the vaccine supposed to reduce transmission - it obviously hasn’t done its job well because it has spread like wildfire
I'd go so far to say it will definitely reduce transmission. That doesn't mean it will stop it.
You have to stop looking at COVID and the vaccine through this lens that the vaccine stops it completely and saves everyone's life. It doesn't do that.
So far it is been hugely beneficial though. We've done really well with Delta and it's basically because of our high vaccination rates. Without that high vaccination rates it would have been an unmitigated disaster.
As well as reducing transmission, vaccination greatly reduces the severity of the virus if it is contracted, and there is a pretty good chance that if it doesn't die out soon that we will all contract it at some stage.
Some of us may get it at some stage and not even know that we had it, which is most likely to occur in people who are fully vaccinated.
Yeah sure, case numbers are up but this is not being reflected in the number of hospital cases and especially in the all important ICU case numbers.
It makes sense that if this latest variant of the virus is extremely contagious and as we continue to open up more that the case numbers will rise.
It is also logical that many of those that contract the virus will be fully vaccinated simply due to sheer numbers involved because the fully vaccinated out number those that are not vaccinated by well over 9 to 1.