innsaneink
Well-known member
Gone - 4 runs - ….could hear a pin drop him walking off
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Fade To Black said:Siddle should be ashamed to call himself an Aussie. How someone can't back up 4 days after rolling his arm over in mild weather conditions is embarrassing. Himself and the media carried on like he had just stormed a machine-gun nest and won a Victoria Cross after the final day in Adelaide, then all week he was banging on like Meryl Streep to the media that he was fatigued but ready to go in Perth, then he pulls the pin on a series-deciding game like a peaheart.
Bowlers of generations past such as Lillee, Thommo, Merv and McGrath would be laughing into their beers at this bloke.
Shameful
@Jazza said:I know its going back a fair way but this series reminds me of the 1992/93 series vs West Indies where the winner of that series was basically the unofficial world champion.**
We dominated large parts of that series yet couldnt finish them off in a couple of tests, after then losing in Adelaide where in the end we should of won, we then got slaughtered in the series decider in Perth thanks to a batting collapse and wilting against some aggressive batting.
@Fade To Black said:Siddle should be ashamed to call himself an Aussie. How someone can't back up 4 days after rolling his arm over in mild weather conditions is embarrassing. Himself and the media carried on like he had just stormed a machine-gun nest and won a Victoria Cross after the final day in Adelaide, then all week he was banging on like Meryl Streep to the media that he was fatigued but ready to go in Perth, then he pulls the pin on a series-deciding game like a peaheart.
Bowlers of generations past such as Lillee, Thommo, Merv and McGrath would be laughing into their beers at this bloke.
Shameful
@GNR4LIFE said:@Jazza said:I know its going back a fair way but this series reminds me of the 1992/93 series vs West Indies where the winner of that series was basically the unofficial world champion.**
We dominated large parts of that series yet couldnt finish them off in a couple of tests, after then losing in Adelaide where in the end we should of won, we then got slaughtered in the series decider in Perth thanks to a batting collapse and wilting against some aggressive batting.
Not sure what comparison you are trying to make here. Not sure if your saying the better team lost the series (Australia) and that they are the unofficial world champions cos you are way off if thats what you are saying
Australia have had their moments of domination in this series, but so have SA, they have matched them at every turn. I still believe if day 2 in Brisbane had not been a wash out then SA would have won the first test convincingly. They came out day 3 not knowing which way to go, wether they should bat normally or speed things up, they fell in a heap and threw their last 5 wickets away because of it. Day 5 in Adelaide speaks for itself, as does yesterday. Both teams have had moments of dominance, but the difference will end up being that SA were able to finish things off and the Aussies weren't, thus confirming their position as the no 1 side in the world
@GNR4LIFE said:@Jazza said:**I know its going back a fair way but this series reminds me of the 1992/93 series vs West Indies where the winner of that series was basically the unofficial world champion.**
We dominated large parts of that series yet couldnt finish them off in a couple of tests, after then losing in Adelaide where in the end we should of won, we then got slaughtered in the series decider in Perth thanks to a batting collapse and wilting against some aggressive batting.
Not sure what comparison you are trying to make here. Not sure if your saying the better team lost the series (Australia) and that they are the unofficial world champions cos you are way off if thats what you are saying
Australia have had their moments of domination in this series, but so have SA, they have matched them at every turn. I still believe if day 2 in Brisbane had not been a wash out then SA would have won the first test convincingly. They came out day 3 not knowing which way to go, wether they should bat normally or speed things up, they fell in a heap and threw their last 5 wickets away because of it. Day 5 in Adelaide speaks for itself, as does yesterday. Both teams have had moments of dominance, but the difference will end up being that SA were able to finish things off and the Aussies weren't, thus confirming their position as the no 1 side in the world
@citizen cub said:@GNR4LIFE said:@Jazza said:I know its going back a fair way but this series reminds me of the 1992/93 series vs West Indies where the winner of that series was basically the unofficial world champion.**
We dominated large parts of that series yet couldnt finish them off in a couple of tests, after then losing in Adelaide where in the end we should of won, we then got slaughtered in the series decider in Perth thanks to a batting collapse and wilting against some aggressive batting.
Not sure what comparison you are trying to make here. Not sure if your saying the better team lost the series (Australia) and that they are the unofficial world champions cos you are way off if thats what you are saying
Australia have had their moments of domination in this series, but so have SA, they have matched them at every turn. I still believe if day 2 in Brisbane had not been a wash out then SA would have won the first test convincingly. They came out day 3 not knowing which way to go, wether they should bat normally or speed things up, they fell in a heap and threw their last 5 wickets away because of it. Day 5 in Adelaide speaks for itself, as does yesterday. Both teams have had moments of dominance, but the difference will end up being that SA were able to finish things off and the Aussies weren't, thus confirming their position as the no 1 side in the world
SA would have won the 1st test convincingly, are you kidding yourself? I do seem to recall Australia scoring 550 odd in their 1st innings and having SA well and truly 'on the ropes' in their 2nd innings. Neither occurrence can be attributed to the lost days play, rather Australia playing the better cricket. SA finished up with 450 in their 1st innings, while some wickets were as a result of batsmen trying to pick up the pace others were off genuinely good bowling. Hardly as if their innings was badly affected by their dilemma either, most teams would gleefully accept 450 against Australia.
\
\
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_
@innsaneink said:Everything Ive heard and read points to PS being 'rested' and that he wouldve given everything to play
I think its pretty damned weak saying "Siddle should be ashamed to call himself an Aussie." without knowing the facts 110%