Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@aubanon said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426926) said:Dale Finucane is a classic case of how we live rent free in so many 'Journalists' heads.
No criticism of Sharkes being played into offering a 4 year deal
Instead a BS story about us submitting and then resubmitting a 4 year deal which never was.
@needaname said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426913) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426654) said:@demps said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426605) said:@gnr4life said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426603) said:@demps said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426596) said:@gnr4life said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426585) said:@thedaboss said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426583) said:Okay
Who is up next
We have almost 1 million dollars of Packers money to spend. For any normal club, the world would be our oyster. Not to worry, I’m sure we’ll pick up a discard or two over the off season. It’s the only time of the year we sign anyone these days.
Discards..
Like Blake Austin, Kevin Naiqama, Martin Taupau types ?
Isn't always a bad thing....
I can see discards being guys like Zac Lomax, Hudson Young, Joe Tapine, David Klemmer.
Glass isn't always half empty.
You can always find a bargain in a discount bin, but I’d rather brand shop.
That off contract list is looking budget as it gets.
We should be looking at players who are under contract and unhappy (Tapine, Klemmer)
Or players stuck behind current starters.
Or guys wanting fresh starts (Lomax, Cotric)
These brand shop players you speak of exist but they're the ones in special circumstances mentioned.
Has any club ever sought salary cap relief on the basis of a reduction to save the embarrassment of not being able to spend it all because no one wants to come"
Wouldn’t you just start extensions of some of the key players that are off contract 22 or 23 and front load that into this year?
@kazoo-kid said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426892) said:Can we launch James Hooper into the sun?
@aubanon said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426926) said:Dale Finucane is a classic case of how we live rent free in so many 'Journalists' heads.
No criticism of Sharkes being played into offering a 4 year deal
Instead a BS story about us submitting and then resubmitting a 4 year deal which never was.
@imback said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428038) said:It’s moneyball guys, not signing Finucane gives us more options. He’s been phenomenal but let’s all remember, Matt Ballin played like 250 games back to back, and the moment we signed him, his body gave away. This seems like one worth passing on for the length of contract he was after. I think we should all be happy about the approach the Tigers are taking to tell the market we are here to compete, not to be used.
@supercoach said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426598) said:@demps said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426584) said:@thedaboss said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426583) said:Okay
Who is up next
Joseph Tapine
?
I heard he is a done deal to the Chooks
@imback said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428038) said:It’s moneyball guys, not signing Finucane gives us more options. He’s been phenomenal but let’s all remember, Matt Ballin played like 250 games back to back, and the moment we signed him, his body gave away. This seems like one worth passing on for the length of contract he was after. I think we should all be happy about the approach the Tigers are taking to tell the market we are here to compete, not to be used.
@earl said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426951) said:@aubanon said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426926) said:Dale Finucane is a classic case of how we live rent free in so many 'Journalists' heads.
No criticism of Sharkes being played into offering a 4 year deal
Instead a BS story about us submitting and then resubmitting a 4 year deal which never was.
Finucane is a dud signing. I'd love him here at 500k for 2 years. The money he was offered from us was overs but it sounds like we are operating smartly now. You can pay overs for a year but no more than that.
@imback said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428097) said:Has anyone ever pointed out Finucane looks like Shrek when he is morphed into a human in Shrek 2? Just FYI
@twentyforty said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428138) said:@earl said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426951) said:@aubanon said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426926) said:Dale Finucane is a classic case of how we live rent free in so many 'Journalists' heads.
No criticism of Sharkes being played into offering a 4 year deal
Instead a BS story about us submitting and then resubmitting a 4 year deal which never was.
Finucane is a dud signing. I'd love him here at 500k for 2 years. The money he was offered from us was overs but it sounds like we are operating smartly now. You can pay overs for a year but no more than that.
We can’t pay anyone overs while our cap is 30% lower than most other clubs.
@geo said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428268) said:@twentyforty said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428138) said:@earl said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426951) said:@aubanon said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426926) said:Dale Finucane is a classic case of how we live rent free in so many 'Journalists' heads.
No criticism of Sharkes being played into offering a 4 year deal
Instead a BS story about us submitting and then resubmitting a 4 year deal which never was.
Finucane is a dud signing. I'd love him here at 500k for 2 years. The money he was offered from us was overs but it sounds like we are operating smartly now. You can pay overs for a year but no more than that.
We can’t pay anyone overs while our cap is 30% lower than most other clubs.
Huh..you need to explain that one a bit..
@cochise said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428275) said:@geo said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428268) said:@twentyforty said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428138) said:@earl said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426951) said:@aubanon said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426926) said:Dale Finucane is a classic case of how we live rent free in so many 'Journalists' heads.
No criticism of Sharkes being played into offering a 4 year deal
Instead a BS story about us submitting and then resubmitting a 4 year deal which never was.
Finucane is a dud signing. I'd love him here at 500k for 2 years. The money he was offered from us was overs but it sounds like we are operating smartly now. You can pay overs for a year but no more than that.
We can’t pay anyone overs while our cap is 30% lower than most other clubs.
Huh..you need to explain that one a bit..
I'm guessing it is in reference to the over paying of certain players.
@gnr4life said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426585) said:@thedaboss said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1426583) said:Okay
Who is up next
We have almost 1 million dollars of Packers money to spend. For any normal club, the world would be our oyster. Not to worry, I’m sure we’ll pick up a discard or two over the off season. It’s the only time of the year we sign anyone these days.
@851 said in [Dale Finucane](/post/1428371) said:we can’t be that bad at sealing a deal