@Cairnstigers said in [Folau signs with Catalans Dragons](/post/1108971) said:
Everyone has opinions about how we should all live our lives
As a high profile sports person you have to be prepared for a backlash if you voice you opinions on social media
There was absolutely no need for Folau to post what he did
Wether you agree with his comments or not I believe it is wrong to post these comments
What was he hoping to achieve anyway
I can see a squirrel grip coming Folau's way
Different people find different things offensive.
I don’t think there’s anything wrong with giving people your personal opinion on a topic as long as it’s your personal opinion and you’re not pretending to talk for someone else.
Folau never said he was speaking on behalf of anyone except himself, and the Bible.
Never said he was talking on behalf of players, sponsors or Rugby Union... in fact never said anything hateful.
References were made that all sinners (whether you believe in his interpretation of sinners or not) should repent before they die to enter Heaven.
Not once has he ever mentioned he hated any of these sinners, although it has been twisted that way by most commentators who believe that’s what ‘modern society’ wants to hear.
Plus it sells papers.
His ‘celebrity’ detractors certainly don’t have any problem putting their opposing views and personal attacks in the media.
But wait... they seem to think they talk for everybody.
If you don’t agree you’re obviously a red neck racist homophobe or a Bible bashing moron.
All hateful assumptions you would think... no redemption on offer?
Funny world we live in when if you state your religious beliefs (and his are way different to mine) you are made a pariah, while others in the same world are lauded for their criminality.
Meh. I personally don't care what Folau says, as much as I think he's moronic. BUT, if he makes public comments that he knows will enrage his employer's sponsors, expect to cop the consequences. If I said anybody would burn in hell, I'd be sacked within 12 hours, regardless of the religious rationale.
Freedom of speech means he can say what he wants. It also means people can say he's a homophobe. Which he is.
So pleasing sponsors is more important than freedom of speech?
What’s next?
Can’t have a different view to the government without repercussions?
No one has said this... Just you twisting things. Grow up