Pawsandclaws
New member
Do you think the Panthers on the lookout for someone to replace Wallace is a motivation for the comment?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Pawsandclaws said:Do you think the Panthers on the lookout for someone to replace Wallace is a motivation for the comment?
@goldcoast tiger said:@Balmain Boy said:It's a crock and the defensive stats are wrong.. move along. nothing to see here people
Their defence stats last week were Brooks 4 mt
Moses 7 m t
11 between them
Why do some here close your eyes to reality, most of us all wanted and still want, these two to succeed, as the club refuses to play anyone else there.
Them going better is the only way we can improve overall
But let's blame the media, their defence stats are rigged, it's all the refs fault.
There's been excuse after excuse made for them this year.
Maybe if one of them had been brought up to F/G, things would pprobably have been different and at least one of them would have had a better chance of developing more. But this club wanted their quick fix and went with both, and what we have is the result.
As for the report on what Gus said ,
It isn't a crock at all, it's exactly what he said, and other good judges such as Andrew Johns ,
has also stepped back from his original assessment of them in the early part of the season.
It's not their fault that they were pushed into first grade,
But they certainly aren't anywhere near what was predicted of them at the start of the year
@Balmain Boy said:It's a crock and the defensive stats are wrong.. move along. nothing to see here people
@innsaneink said:They dont really commplement each other, plus two rookies at once isnt the ideal set up
@TrueTiger said:Well I reckon if Moses wasn't Bennys relation,he would be developing in State cup and Austin would have been helping Brooks find his feet in the NRL…but go on give me the Austin is a hog and Moses is such a brilliant player..hang on in NYC...this is NRL and the New board,particularly with the help of knucklehead MAYER we opted to put 2 lambs to the slaughter at the same time,because they will be our FUTURE whatever's...
Not knocking any of the kids,but realistically you have to gradually bleed the young blood,not together in a world completely different to what they had been used to..
Now I will wait patiently for everybody to bag the hell out of me for saying what I feel should have happened..
I wish the young guns all the best,and I hope the asylum can keep them beyond the end of their contracts...because really all they want to do is play football and WIN...
@guyofthetiger said:Seems to me Moses has more of the 5/8 running and passing game and Brooks the more traditional halfback approach with a good running game also.
The fact they can also interchange is surely a bonus.
Until they have quality players outside them, how can you really judge their potential or their progress as playmakers??
@benji#6 said:@Pawsandclaws said:Do you think the Panthers on the lookout for someone to replace Wallace is a motivation for the comment?
Yes. Ive heard gus wants moses
_Posted using RoarFEED Android 1.2.3_
@diedpretty said:@goldcoast tiger said:@Balmain Boy said:It's a crock and the defensive stats are wrong.. move along. nothing to see here people
Their defence stats last week were Brooks 4 mt
Moses 7 m t
11 between them
Why do some here close your eyes to reality, most of us all wanted and still want, these two to succeed, as the club refuses to play anyone else there.
Them going better is the only way we can improve overall
But let's blame the media, their defence stats are rigged, it's all the refs fault.
There's been excuse after excuse made for them this year.
Maybe if one of them had been brought up to F/G, things would pprobably have been different and at least one of them would have had a better chance of developing more. But this club wanted their quick fix and went with both, and what we have is the result.
As for the report on what Gus said ,
It isn't a crock at all, it's exactly what he said, and other good judges such as Andrew Johns ,
has also stepped back from his original assessment of them in the early part of the season.
It's not their fault that they were pushed into first grade,
But they certainly aren't anywhere near what was predicted of them at the start of the year
Agree 100% - I hate to harp on it but if we had of kept Austin for the final year of his contract I think we would have seen an entirely different scenario. Brooks would have a more experienced player calling the shots as well and had this year as second string to learn the ropes. Moses could have been used as a 14 in a number of games to ease him into FG and our right side defence would have been a lot more solid. We have let a lot of players go but whoever signed off on this one obviously didn't give much thought to what they were doing.
@TrueTiger said:Well I reckon if Moses wasn't Bennys relation,he would be developing in State cup and Austin would have been helping Brooks find his feet in the NRL…but go on give me the Austin is a hog and Moses is such a brilliant player..hang on in NYC...this is NRL and the New board,particularly with the help of knucklehead MAYER we opted to put 2 lambs to the slaughter at the same time,because they will be our FUTURE whatever's...
Not knocking any of the kids,but realistically you have to gradually bleed the young blood,not together in a world completely different to what they had been used to..
Now I will wait patiently for everybody to bag the hell out of me for saying what I feel should have happened..
I wish the young guns all the best,and I hope the asylum can keep them beyond the end of their contracts...because really all they want to do is play football and WIN...
@innsaneink said:They dont really commplement each other, plus two rookies at once isnt the ideal set up
@Flippedy said:What would a nuffy like Gould know? Supercoach JT knows best.
@magpiecol said:@goldcoast tiger said:@Balmain Boy said:It's a crock and the defensive stats are wrong.. move along. nothing to see here people
Their defence stats last week were Brooks 4 mt
Moses 7 m t
11 between them
Why do some here close your eyes to reality, most of us all wanted and still want, these two to succeed, as the club refuses to play anyone else there.
Them going better is the only way we can improve overall
But let's blame the media, their defence stats are rigged, it's all the refs fault.
There's been excuse after excuse made for them this year.
Maybe if one of them had been brought up to F/G, things would pprobably have been different and at least one of them would have had a better chance of developing more. But this club wanted their quick fix and went with both, and what we have is the result.
As for the report on what Gus said ,
It isn't a crock at all, it's exactly what he said, and other good judges such as Andrew Johns ,
has also stepped back from his original assessment of them in the early part of the season.
It's not their fault that they were pushed into first grade,
But they certainly aren't anywhere near what was predicted of them at the start of the year
So, who would be your halfback or 5/8? Would you put Moses to fullback and Teddy to center? Personally I would give it a try.
No good putting crap on people without an alternative.