Jedi_Tiger
Well-known member
shows you how good Johns was, he could defend and organise and attack and also have that clutch play when needed. So good he could play hooker for kangaroos and Blues when needed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@avocadoontoast said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173263) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173255) said:@fibrodreaming said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173238) said:@jirskyr said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173199) said:He starts with an established good side, containing some of the GOATs, then leaves for the only other team that has a strike rate anywhere near as good as Melbourne’s. I can understand that but can’t respect it, nor can I respect his comments.
My interpretation is that Cronk is basically saying that he was a decent half back only, and that he had to play in great teams in order to make him look good.
Accordingly, if he played in a struggle-street team like the Tigers, his career would probably have lasted only 100 games or so.
Which means, that if he had joined the WT instead of Easts a few years back, his lack of greatness would have been obvious to all and his reputation would have been tarnished.
In providing his self-serving advice to Grant (which he dresses up as "fatherly" advice to a rookie) he not only denigrates our club and our coach, he also denigrates himself as a player.
However, Harry Grant is more than just a decent dummy half. Rather, he appears destined for greatness, and I would back him to shine in any company. Unlike Cronk, he doesn't need great players around him to make him look good.
Think you’re being a bit harsh on Cronks ability he was a terrific halfback. His career would’ve been different if we was at a weaker club no doubt but he was still fantastic as a player, showed it at origin level and Australian level too.
Cronk is a very smart footballer with a good kicking game that surrounded himself with the best players his entire career. If he had have chosen the Wests Tigers rather than the Melbourne Storm I don't think he'd have had the storied career he has.
@TigerSJ said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173309) said:It is hard to judge how any player's game might change with the team he is playing with - obviously if you are surrounded by Turkeys it's hard to soar like and Eagle! My view is if you have the attributes physically, the skills and the mental toughness and attitude of a champion - then you are going to be a champion wherever you play. The question is for how long and to what standard are you able to reach.
Absolutely no doubt that if you play with great players in a successful team and culture, you are far more likely to reach your full potential. I think Teddy is a perfect example of this, and probably the contrary could be said for some of the lean years with Benji when there were fewer quality players around him. Is young Flanagan a superstar? or is he a quality young kid doing a solid job in a great team?
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173352) said:To give you an idea about how this bloke rates himself and his opinion, you only needed look at his website.
@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173289) said:@Russell said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173288) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173270) said:@Russell said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173264) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173255) said:@fibrodreaming said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173238) said:@jirskyr said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173199) said:He starts with an established good side, containing some of the GOATs, then leaves for the only other team that has a strike rate anywhere near as good as Melbourne’s. I can understand that but can’t respect it, nor can I respect his comments.
My interpretation is that Cronk is basically saying that he was a decent half back only, and that he had to play in great teams in order to make him look good.
Accordingly, if he played in a struggle-street team like the Tigers, his career would probably have lasted only 100 games or so.
Which means, that if he had joined the WT instead of Easts a few years back, his lack of greatness would have been obvious to all and his reputation would have been tarnished.
In providing his self-serving advice to Grant (which he dresses up as "fatherly" advice to a rookie) he not only denigrates our club and our coach, he also denigrates himself as a player.
However, Harry Grant is more than just a decent dummy half. Rather, he appears destined for greatness, and I would back him to shine in any company. Unlike Cronk, he doesn't need great players around him to make him look good.
Think you’re being a bit harsh on Cronks ability he was a terrific halfback. His career would’ve been different if we was at a weaker club no doubt but he was still fantastic as a player, showed it at origin level and Australian level too.
He proved that he was a reliable robot as well for Origin and Australia with more great players around him.
The two words to describe Cronk that come to mind are reliable and consistant.
Nothing else imo.
Not many halves in the modern game are reliable and consistent though that’s my point. Bloke didn’t have a bad game playing one of the hardest positions. Incredibly smart footballer who rarely ever made errors out on the field
We know all that....the point is how good would he have been, how many errors would he have made, how many of his kicks would have been scored off...
IF HE HAD PLAYED FOR THE TITANS?
Would have been about as good as Ashley Taylor imo.
No chance sure he might not win premiershipa but his kicking game, passing game and game management are top notch doesn’t matter what team he’s in
@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173381) said:Madge with a comeback against coopers comments... ‘coop hasn’t seen what we’re building here’.
@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173381) said:Madge with a comeback against coopers comments... ‘coop hasn’t seen what we’re building here’.
@Bee-Em said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173385) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173289) said:@Russell said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173288) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173270) said:@Russell said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173264) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173255) said:@fibrodreaming said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173238) said:@jirskyr said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173199) said:He starts with an established good side, containing some of the GOATs, then leaves for the only other team that has a strike rate anywhere near as good as Melbourne’s. I can understand that but can’t respect it, nor can I respect his comments.
My interpretation is that Cronk is basically saying that he was a decent half back only, and that he had to play in great teams in order to make him look good.
Accordingly, if he played in a struggle-street team like the Tigers, his career would probably have lasted only 100 games or so.
Which means, that if he had joined the WT instead of Easts a few years back, his lack of greatness would have been obvious to all and his reputation would have been tarnished.
In providing his self-serving advice to Grant (which he dresses up as "fatherly" advice to a rookie) he not only denigrates our club and our coach, he also denigrates himself as a player.
However, Harry Grant is more than just a decent dummy half. Rather, he appears destined for greatness, and I would back him to shine in any company. Unlike Cronk, he doesn't need great players around him to make him look good.
Think you’re being a bit harsh on Cronks ability he was a terrific halfback. His career would’ve been different if we was at a weaker club no doubt but he was still fantastic as a player, showed it at origin level and Australian level too.
He proved that he was a reliable robot as well for Origin and Australia with more great players around him.
The two words to describe Cronk that come to mind are reliable and consistant.
Nothing else imo.
Not many halves in the modern game are reliable and consistent though that’s my point. Bloke didn’t have a bad game playing one of the hardest positions. Incredibly smart footballer who rarely ever made errors out on the field
We know all that....the point is how good would he have been, how many errors would he have made, how many of his kicks would have been scored off...
IF HE HAD PLAYED FOR THE TITANS?
Would have been about as good as Ashley Taylor imo.
No chance sure he might not win premiershipa but his kicking game, passing game and game management are top notch doesn’t matter what team he’s in
No doubting Cronks skills, and looking at his game management abilities he'd probably make a good coach one day.
But for a healthy game, his comments probably weren't his best. If we want to stick with 3 or 4 teams always having an advantage, keep stacking them up with the best. League then will never be an even competition.
@851 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173404) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173381) said:Madge with a comeback against coopers comments... ‘coop hasn’t seen what we’re building here’.
The video of Madge telling it how it is
https://www.nrl.com/news/2020/07/03/madges-mission-to-build-wests-tigers-temple/
@avocadoontoast said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173413) said:@851 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173404) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173381) said:Madge with a comeback against coopers comments... ‘coop hasn’t seen what we’re building here’.
The video of Madge telling it how it is
https://www.nrl.com/news/2020/07/03/madges-mission-to-build-wests-tigers-temple/
Really hoping this is the beginning of our upward trajectory. We’ve waited long enough.
@JD-Tiger said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173359) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173352) said:To give you an idea about how this bloke rates himself and his opinion, you only needed look at his website.
Seems to be down atm, such a pity
@jirskyr said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173419) said:@JD-Tiger said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173359) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173352) said:To give you an idea about how this bloke rates himself and his opinion, you only needed look at his website.
Seems to be down atm, such a pity
Been down for years hasn't it? He copped a lot of... feedback... and took it down.
@Cairnstigers said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173277) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173255) said:@fibrodreaming said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173238) said:@jirskyr said in [Harry Grant](/post/1173199) said:He starts with an established good side, containing some of the GOATs, then leaves for the only other team that has a strike rate anywhere near as good as Melbourne’s. I can understand that but can’t respect it, nor can I respect his comments.
My interpretation is that Cronk is basically saying that he was a decent half back only, and that he had to play in great teams in order to make him look good.
Accordingly, if he played in a struggle-street team like the Tigers, his career would probably have lasted only 100 games or so.
Which means, that if he had joined the WT instead of Easts a few years back, his lack of greatness would have been obvious to all and his reputation would have been tarnished.
In providing his self-serving advice to Grant (which he dresses up as "fatherly" advice to a rookie) he not only denigrates our club and our coach, he also denigrates himself as a player.
However, Harry Grant is more than just a decent dummy half. Rather, he appears destined for greatness, and I would back him to shine in any company. Unlike Cronk, he doesn't need great players around him to make him look good.
Think you’re being a bit harsh on Cronks ability he was a terrific halfback. His career would’ve been different if we was at a weaker club no doubt but he was still fantastic as a player, showed it at origin level and Australian level too.
He took the easy road when he left Melbourne
A great player can shine at any club