Tiger_Watto
New member
@Geo. said:@Tiger Watto said:@gallagher said:I doubt that Watto. Paying off their debt to the NRL would be enough. Otherwise they set the price for a billion and never have to sell. The NRL would have that in the agreement.
The only way that could happen is if the NRL sued Balmain for the debt and they were forced to declare bankruptcy.
Do you really think the NRL will go down that path?
The only card the NRL will play is canceling the license… That leaves both parties with zero equity!
Bit hard to do when the licence is between the Wests Tigers and the NRL….the JV partners are only liable for the operating losses from year to year of the Wests Tigers
"The name and logo of the entity has formed part of our licensing agreement with the NRL," Cook said on Wednesday. "Therefore, any changes in shareholding will have no impact on the name, colour or logos of the organisation.
"That's fact. It's a condition of our NRL licence."
\
"The NRL licence is between the NRL and the Wests Tigers and not the shareholders. The shareholders are not connected to the licence. From Wests Ashfield perspective it will have no impact on the Wests Tigers."
\
"Balmain, or Wests [Ashfield] for that matter, are not contracted to the NRL - Wests Tigers are," Cook said. "What Balmain do has no impact on the NRL licence.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/wests-ashfield-ceo-simon-cook-says-tigers-name-wont-be-replaced-by-magpies-20140319-hvkfo.html
So the NRL borrowed the money to the Wests Tigers, and there only real option if the money isn't repayed is retracting the license?