Isaiah Papali’i #265

[Newtown]

YOu are wrong.

Tigers never spoke to Green or Potter. Papali'i is coming to the Tigers, will be confirmed at the end of Parras season

Thanks. Your info is much more substantial than this Oxy whatever.

 

[hank37w]

It is no longer specifically written into the NRL Contracts, but it is Contract Law that Contracts have a cooling off period, whether expressed or not. It doesnt matter what is written into a Contract with respect to cooling off periods becaus eyou cant Contract outside the law. Court tested law.

Totally irrelevant because the time has well and truly elapsed even if the 10 day cooling off period was enforceable.

His arse is ours if this club has any ticker what so ever and if they don't enforce it then we deserve all the ridicule we receive from the media and the general public.

For God's sake Wests Tigers stand up for what is right and don't fold like a house of cards in the eye of a hurricane.

 

[hank37w]

Thanks. Your info is much more substantial than this Oxy whatever.

Moron?

 

[diedpretty]

It is no longer specifically written into the NRL Contracts, but it is Contract Law that Contracts have a cooling off period, whether expressed or not. It doesnt matter what is written into a Contract with respect to cooling off periods becaus eyou cant Contract outside the law. Court tested law.

I am of the understanding that except for certain types of contracts particularly in property purchases and telemarketing sales that unless a cooling off period is stipulated in the contract then it is not an avenue that can be used to get out of a contract.

 

[The SHADOW]

I am of the understanding that except for certain types of contracts particularly in property purchases and telemarketing sales that unless a cooling off period is stipulated in the contract then it is not an avenue that can be used to get out of a contract.

I hazard a guess. The more money involved the more likely a cooling off period exists.

 

[diedpretty]

I hazard a guess. The more money involved the more likely a cooling off period exists.

Or the more dodgy the sale is.

 

[Nelson]

It is no longer specifically written into the NRL Contracts, but it is Contract Law that Contracts have a cooling off period, whether expressed or not. It doesnt matter what is written into a Contract with respect to cooling off periods becaus eyou cant Contract outside the law. Court tested law.

That’s not correct. “Contract law” is not homogenous and there are different regulations for different types of transactions that do or do not allow for the waiver of cooling off periods that might otherwise be available or implied.

 

[CloudyGlock]

I am of the understanding that except for certain types of contracts particularly in property purchases and telemarketing sales that unless a cooling off period is stipulated in the contract then it is not an avenue that can be used to get out of a contract.

You are wrong

 

[CloudyGlock]

That’s not correct. “Contract law” is not homogenous and there are different regulations for different types of transactions that do or do not allow for the waiver of cooling off periods that might otherwise be available or implied.

You are wrong. There are basic tenets of Contract Law that are completely "homogenous" in ALL Contracts. This is Contract Law 101 and what is considered in the first 20 seconds of any Contract dispute. Starter level Law.

A Contract has to have Form, has to have Real and genuine consent by both parties (cooling off period), has to have Offer and acceptance, has to be Legal, both parties have to have an Intention of entering into a Contract (COP), both parties have to have Capacity to enter a Contract (COP).

Dont pretend where you dont know.

 

[CloudyGlock]

Or the more dodgy the sale is.

You cant Contract into a dodgy sale.

 

[Telltails]

Without knowing anything about what his intentions are or the legalities associated with the contract, I'll believe it when I see it.

 

[The SHADOW]

Without knowing anything about what his intentions are or the legalities associated with the contract, I'll believe it when I see it.

This can apply to any signings. Get some confidence.

 

[Telltails]

This can apply to any signings. Get some confidence.

I'm trying but you know how it goes - expect the worst and hope for the best.

 

[diedpretty]

You cant Contract into a dodgy sale.

No but you have a legal cooling off period with dodgy telemarket sales.

 

[Nelson]

You are wrong. There are basic tenets of Contract Law that are completely "homogenous" in ALL Contracts. This is Contract Law 101 and what is considered in the first 20 seconds of any Contract dispute. Starter level Law.

A Contract has to have Form, has to have Real and genuine consent by both parties (cooling off period), has to have Offer and acceptance, has to be Legal, both parties have to have an Intention of entering into a Contract (COP), both parties have to have Capacity to enter a Contract (COP).

Dont pretend where you dont know.

I’m a lawyer and you have no idea you arrogant bell-end.

 

[CloudyGlock]

I’m a lawyer and you have no idea you arrogant bell-end.

Then you are clearly a very poor lawyer. This is literally day 1 of Contract Law.

As a "lawyer" you can define FROLIC as it relates to Contract Law?

Mate you are not a Lawyer...dont pretend. You just embarrassed yourself.

 

[CloudyGlock]

No but you have a legal cooling off period with dodgy telemarket sales.

Thats the whole point. If the sale is "dodgy" then you cant be Contracted into it and the "cooling off" period is simply the epxressing that one of the requirement tenets of a Contract are not met, such as real and genuine consent.

 

[coivtny]

I’m a lawyer and you have no idea you arrogant bell-end.

You are wrong. There are basic tenets of Contract Law that are completely "homogenous" in ALL Contracts. This is Contract Law 101 and what is considered in the first 20 seconds of any Contract dispute. Starter level Law.

A Contract has to have Form, has to have Real and genuine consent by both parties (cooling off period), has to have Offer and acceptance, has to be Legal, both parties have to have an Intention of entering into a Contract (COP), both parties have to have Capacity to enter a Contract (COP).

Dont pretend where you dont know.

You are wrong. There are basic tenets of Contract Law that are completely "homogenous" in ALL Contracts. This is Contract Law 101 and what is considered in the first 20 seconds of any Contract dispute. Starter level Law.

A Contract has to have Form, has to have Real and genuine consent by both parties (cooling off period), has to have Offer and acceptance, has to be Legal, both parties have to have an Intention of entering into a Contract (COP), both parties have to have Capacity to enter a Contract (COP).

Dont pretend where you dont know.

Contracts DO NOT have to have a cooling off period. Standard NRL contracts did once but they don't anymore. Also in your amateur description of contract law 101 you completely overlooked consideration. You're talking out of your rear end.

 

[CocaCola]

Better Call Saul

 

[CloudyGlock]

I am a lawyer

And still couldnt define FROLIC.

Anyone who studies a 1st year law class, knows all there is to know about what is learned in 1st year law class no? What is learned in first year doesnt apply?

That is my entire point. The principles that I am talking about ARE the basic principles of Contract Law. The fact that there are more complex issues doesnt negate the basic principles.

Also Mr "Barrister", Contract Law isnt regulated you muppet. Who is the regulating authority? Please point me in the direction of a Contract Law "regulation".

I believe that you once played a Barrister in the high school musical.