Jahream Bula #269

I think the answer is in what upside they have and how we are performing as a club. At the moment there isn't much to keep a kid in reggies waiting given how poorly we have performed over the last decade plus. It is a bit of chicken and egg - we need to perform to have them prepared to stay and we need good players with depth behind them to get results.

Like everyone I'm trying to read the tea leaves, but is we have made two offers to Bula (and leaked them) my gut feel is that we know what Bula is worth to us value wise and we are propared to let him walk because other talent has been identified. My expectation is that Bula (Moses) thinks that the offer is too low and is dragging it out in an effort to shake more $ from us or another club.

If Bula was someone to build the team around I don't think this discussion is happening and he would be a must keep and the juniors would have to get in line. As it stands he is a nice to have now - but replaceable within our existing resources (with risk).

If we get the model right we will (eventially) be able to reap the benefits of both talent and depth - but is requires investment and I haven't heard any money dropping from the HBG tree.

We’ve been told the Tigers don’t leak … are you sure it wasn’t Moses? He leaks like a sieve…also wasn’t the rumours that the offer was like $900-950 per ? Hope Moses doesnt think that is light …

Have you heard different about the amount of the offer?
 
We’ve been told the Tigers don’t leak … are you sure it wasn’t Moses? He leaks like a sieve…also wasn’t the rumours that the offer was like $900-950 per ? Hope Moses doesnt think that is light …

Have you heard different about the amount of the offer?
No - I am the unwashed like the rest of us. I am just going off how the media has portrayed the information: "... reliable sources have confirmed that he has met with other clubs, Mielekamp admitted that Bula's management is simply trying to get the best deal for the young star." and "..
According to The Sydney Morning Herald, the Tigers have presented two different contract options to Bula and his management in an attempt to keep him at the joint-venture for the foreseeable future.

Set to be worth just under $1 million a season, one of the options is a two-year contract extension while the other one is a four-year extension which will keep him on their books until the end of the 2031 season."

I have made the assumption that we leaked it so that there is no wiggle room for Moses - we made the offers to accommodate what Bula has asked for: a shorter term higher $ deal and a longer term lower dollar security deal. This, to me, refects his value proposition. We have a short term capability gap - so we need Bula until Attard or Brooks are ready or to give us time to recruit if either of those pair or "Tino" don't make the grade. If he wants a longer term deal we need to have money in the cap to keep at least one of the three youngsters nipping at his heels.

By releasing the details we have effectively knobbled Moses as the details are out in the open and Bula/Moses know that we have options by the way the offers have been tabled. In short - Jahream we are keen to keep you, on our terms and at a the value we think you are worth. I expect Moses is banking on his charge upping his game to earn more $ - he certainly didn't start well though.
 
No - I am the unwashed like the rest of us. I am just going off how the media has portrayed the information: "... reliable sources have confirmed that he has met with other clubs, Mielekamp admitted that Bula's management is simply trying to get the best deal for the young star." and "..
According to The Sydney Morning Herald, the Tigers have presented two different contract options to Bula and his management in an attempt to keep him at the joint-venture for the foreseeable future.

Set to be worth just under $1 million a season, one of the options is a two-year contract extension while the other one is a four-year extension which will keep him on their books until the end of the 2031 season."

I have made the assumption that we leaked it so that there is no wiggle room for Moses - we made the offers to accommodate what Bula has asked for: a shorter term higher $ deal and a longer term lower dollar security deal. This, to me, refects his value proposition. We have a short term capability gap - so we need Bula until Attard or Brooks are ready or to give us time to recruit if either of those pair or "Tino" don't make the grade. If he wants a longer term deal we need to have money in the cap to keep at least one of the three youngsters nipping at his heels.

By releasing the details we have effectively knobbled Moses as the details are out in the open and Bula/Moses know that we have options by the way the offers have been tabled. In short - Jahream we are keen to keep you, on our terms and at a the value we think you are worth. I expect Moses is banking on his charge upping his game to earn more $ - he certainly didn't start well though.

Ok .,thanks …I missed that story at the time ..,,

That should definitely be the ceiling from us … If they decline it then the club should enforce the option for 2027 to buy some more time to replace him … Im not convinced they will do this …Hope I’m wrong about that
 
My understanding is that Shaun is interim for this year - don't think they are looking for a replacement as yet - so more of the same is likely to come.
So we are having an interim ceo for the entire 2026 season?

Im convinced they are setting up for their next move to appoint hbgs preferred ceo at the end of the 2026 season.
 
Back
Top