@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Our mate Jimmy Hooper shot down the suggestion, reckons he'll put pen to paper for 4 years this week.
Same one that said a deal was done a week or so ago? He's a peanut. Teddy has agreed to terms but those terms have been rejected by NRL on TPA basis. Doesn't mean he's coming back or what ever just means the roosters have to find the money promised in the contract elsewhere or teddy can accept a lesser offer or he can reject it all together.
Smoking Gun mate, I appreciate your inside info most of the time but im calling rubbish on this one.
Your source is from inside the Tigers club, I can guarantee you the Wests Tigers have no knowledge of what is going on between the Roosters and Tedesco. How does your source have such great information?
I've worked in rugby league for almost a decade. I have worked for 3 clubs in various positions (mostly being player analysis orientated) I have some connections. Not just at tigers. This info is from an NRL employee directly. It is what it is. Nothing is suggesting Tedesco is staying it's just that the NRL didn't register the terms of the contract on the TPA's. Call it what u want. It is what it is.
SG - do managers request clubs get all offers signed off by NRL before presenting them to their clients or only the one the player intends on signing.
In other words would the tigers, rosters and dogs offers been presented to the NRL for James.