Josh Reynolds - in the news..... Again

@851 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158998) said:
Nothing to see, read his twitter post, false positive drug test

This makes me quite angry. If Josh's post is correct he knew before leaving the police station he was negative and so would have Rothfield (which raises the question how Rothfield found out). Then the Tele push the drug test line as if it's a major deal.

This is gutter journalism at it's worst. Mind you, I expect nothing less from a Murdoch organisation.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159003) said:
@851 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158998) said:
Nothing to see, read his twitter post, false positive drug test

This makes me quite angry. If Josh's post is correct he knew before leaving the police station he was negative and so would have Rothfield (which raises the question how Rothfield found out). Then the Tele push the drug test line as if it's a major deal.

This is gutter journalism at it's worst. Mind you, I expect nothing less from a Murdoch organisation.

Buzz is a scum bag journalist at its finest. His beloved / drug cheating Sharks seem escape his jouro radar every time. Anything to take the heat off them. How does anyone take this fool seriously.
 
Players take relaxants on plane trips these can get positive roadside tests. Very simple solution if there is any doubt get the player to take a hair follicle test which shows use in the last 90 days.
Rules would probably prohibit this however, if someone is clean it’s the easy solution.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159003) said:
@851 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158998) said:
Nothing to see, read his twitter post, false positive drug test

This makes me quite angry. If Josh's post is correct he knew before leaving the police station he was negative and so would have Rothfield **(which raises the question how Rothfield found out)**. Then the Tele push the drug test line as if it's a major deal.

This is gutter journalism at it's worst. Mind you, I expect nothing less from a Murdoch organisation.

It does say WT informed the integrity unity of what happened. I would think Rothfield would have some grub in the NRL feeding him every bit of dirt that they get notified of.
 
It is a long weekend and double demerits apply so he may have an issue possibly about driving with an expired license. The NSW Police were everywhere in Caringbah - Kingsway, Captain Cook Dr, President Ave and Taren Point Road. Who would drive with an expired license in that scenario?
 
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158994) said:
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158988) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158984) said:
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158979) said:
hey all, nasser here,

if there is an opportunity to get rid of reynolds we have to jump on it. the guy is on 800k this year and it goes to 900k next year with backended deal. if theres a chance to get rid of him and put that to a player who actually plays 1st grade then josh reynolds out. we could sign 95% of players in the nrl with that money.

You're obviously not aware of how the salary cap works Nasser so go and figure that out before you start sprouting nonsense on here.

nasser here,

not really. you free up 900k and its a 900k to spend elsewhere. i didnt do uni but it doesnt seem like rocket science.

Nup, you're clueless. The Tigers aren't going to pay $900k to offload Josh as it leaves them 900k poorer. No one out there is willing to pay even half that amount to take Josh off our hands so it's a no win situation - comprende?

nasser here,

i get that, but if he brings the game into disrepute and is sacked by the stand down policy, or for breaching contract, then obviously he can be sacked and contract torn up, which means we wouldnt have to pay him.
 
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159017) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158994) said:
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158988) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158984) said:
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158979) said:
hey all, nasser here,

if there is an opportunity to get rid of reynolds we have to jump on it. the guy is on 800k this year and it goes to 900k next year with backended deal. if theres a chance to get rid of him and put that to a player who actually plays 1st grade then josh reynolds out. we could sign 95% of players in the nrl with that money.

You're obviously not aware of how the salary cap works Nasser so go and figure that out before you start sprouting nonsense on here.

nasser here,

not really. you free up 900k and its a 900k to spend elsewhere. i didnt do uni but it doesnt seem like rocket science.

Nup, you're clueless. The Tigers aren't going to pay $900k to offload Josh as it leaves them 900k poorer. No one out there is willing to pay even half that amount to take Josh off our hands so it's a no win situation - comprende?

nasser here,

i get that, but if he brings the game into disrepute and is sacked by the stand down policy, or for breaching contract, then obviously he can be sacked and contract torn up, which means we wouldnt have to pay him.

And that's unlikely to happen.
 
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159019) said:
nasser here,

we can only hope willow. but if theres an opening to do so we have to!

No we don’t. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Reynolds playing in the halves this week.
 
I hope Buzz gets what's coming to him one day. The lack of consequence for his rubbish articles sucks.
 
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158988) said:
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158984) said:
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158979) said:
hey all, nasser here,

if there is an opportunity to get rid of reynolds we have to jump on it. the guy is on 800k this year and it goes to 900k next year with backended deal. if theres a chance to get rid of him and put that to a player who actually plays 1st grade then josh reynolds out. we could sign 95% of players in the nrl with that money.

You're obviously not aware of how the salary cap works Nasser so go and figure that out before you start sprouting nonsense on here.

nasser here,

not really. you free up 900k and its a 900k to spend elsewhere. i didnt do uni but it doesnt seem like rocket science.

With a name like NASA you would know about Rocket science
So why don't you take off
 
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159064) said:
Pascoe probably drugged him lol

Spiked his drink you reckon ?😳
Maybe the drink was for Jennings 😂
 
@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159068) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159064) said:
Pascoe probably drugged him lol

Spiked his drink you reckon ??
Maybe the drink was for Jennings ?

Probably the whole side bar Grant .....Cops couldn't be in 17 locations at once
 
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159070) said:
@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159068) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159064) said:
Pascoe probably drugged him lol

Spiked his drink you reckon ??
Maybe the drink was for Jennings ?

Probably the whole side bar Grant .....Cops couldn't be in 17 locations at once

Shame !
 
Back
Top