Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@851 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158998) said:Nothing to see, read his twitter post, false positive drug test
@voice_of_reason said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159003) said:@851 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158998) said:Nothing to see, read his twitter post, false positive drug test
This makes me quite angry. If Josh's post is correct he knew before leaving the police station he was negative and so would have Rothfield (which raises the question how Rothfield found out). Then the Tele push the drug test line as if it's a major deal.
This is gutter journalism at it's worst. Mind you, I expect nothing less from a Murdoch organisation.
@voice_of_reason said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159003) said:@851 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158998) said:Nothing to see, read his twitter post, false positive drug test
This makes me quite angry. If Josh's post is correct he knew before leaving the police station he was negative and so would have Rothfield **(which raises the question how Rothfield found out)**. Then the Tele push the drug test line as if it's a major deal.
This is gutter journalism at it's worst. Mind you, I expect nothing less from a Murdoch organisation.
@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158994) said:@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158988) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158984) said:@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158979) said:hey all, nasser here,
if there is an opportunity to get rid of reynolds we have to jump on it. the guy is on 800k this year and it goes to 900k next year with backended deal. if theres a chance to get rid of him and put that to a player who actually plays 1st grade then josh reynolds out. we could sign 95% of players in the nrl with that money.
You're obviously not aware of how the salary cap works Nasser so go and figure that out before you start sprouting nonsense on here.
nasser here,
not really. you free up 900k and its a 900k to spend elsewhere. i didnt do uni but it doesnt seem like rocket science.
Nup, you're clueless. The Tigers aren't going to pay $900k to offload Josh as it leaves them 900k poorer. No one out there is willing to pay even half that amount to take Josh off our hands so it's a no win situation - comprende?
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159017) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158994) said:@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158988) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158984) said:@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158979) said:hey all, nasser here,
if there is an opportunity to get rid of reynolds we have to jump on it. the guy is on 800k this year and it goes to 900k next year with backended deal. if theres a chance to get rid of him and put that to a player who actually plays 1st grade then josh reynolds out. we could sign 95% of players in the nrl with that money.
You're obviously not aware of how the salary cap works Nasser so go and figure that out before you start sprouting nonsense on here.
nasser here,
not really. you free up 900k and its a 900k to spend elsewhere. i didnt do uni but it doesnt seem like rocket science.
Nup, you're clueless. The Tigers aren't going to pay $900k to offload Josh as it leaves them 900k poorer. No one out there is willing to pay even half that amount to take Josh off our hands so it's a no win situation - comprende?
nasser here,
i get that, but if he brings the game into disrepute and is sacked by the stand down policy, or for breaching contract, then obviously he can be sacked and contract torn up, which means we wouldnt have to pay him.
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159019) said:nasser here,
we can only hope willow. but if theres an opening to do so we have to!
@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158988) said:@willow said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158984) said:@Nasser said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1158979) said:hey all, nasser here,
if there is an opportunity to get rid of reynolds we have to jump on it. the guy is on 800k this year and it goes to 900k next year with backended deal. if theres a chance to get rid of him and put that to a player who actually plays 1st grade then josh reynolds out. we could sign 95% of players in the nrl with that money.
You're obviously not aware of how the salary cap works Nasser so go and figure that out before you start sprouting nonsense on here.
nasser here,
not really. you free up 900k and its a 900k to spend elsewhere. i didnt do uni but it doesnt seem like rocket science.
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159064) said:Pascoe probably drugged him lol
@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159068) said:@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159064) said:Pascoe probably drugged him lol
Spiked his drink you reckon ??
Maybe the drink was for Jennings ?
@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159070) said:@hobbo1 said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159068) said:@happy_tiger said in [Josh Reynolds \- in the news\.\.\.\.\. Again](/post/1159064) said:Pascoe probably drugged him lol
Spiked his drink you reckon ??
Maybe the drink was for Jennings ?
Probably the whole side bar Grant .....Cops couldn't be in 17 locations at once