Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085740) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085724) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085606) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085478) said:
@Dyloh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085469) said:
@TIGER doesn't seem to bother you if you make yourself look like a clown so not sure your why your worried if our Chair looks like an idiot or not.

I've said from the beginning that players like Latrell don't sign with the Tigers.
If you just read Madges comments he clearly explained that we pulled the offer because of Latrells lack of commitment to our club.
Which means Latrell doesn't want to play for us, which is what I've been trying to get through people's thick heads

So please point out anything I've said that has been inaccurate.

Can you give it a rest mate.
The "I told u so" attitude isn't impressing anyone.
All I've seen from you is some high and mighty attitude.
Wow, congrats... you're pessimistic and moaned and groaned about the tigers trying to sign a star player and it didn't happen.

You predicted correct now you want praise for getting it right? Get outta here kid.

Nice strawman
You must only read what you want to hear, I wanted us to sign him I stated that more than once.
I just didn't believe that he would.
Do you understand the difference?
Keep reading what you want and ignoring what actually write though.

All your recent posts are you having a sook and talking down to people....

#Gronk
Never noticed u as a poster till you started clowning around this thread.
Enoughs enough.

Why would I sook if I was right all along?

I'm really interested in hearing your answer
 
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085740) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085724) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085606) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085478) said:
@Dyloh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085469) said:
@TIGER doesn't seem to bother you if you make yourself look like a clown so not sure your why your worried if our Chair looks like an idiot or not.

I've said from the beginning that players like Latrell don't sign with the Tigers.
If you just read Madges comments he clearly explained that we pulled the offer because of Latrells lack of commitment to our club.
Which means Latrell doesn't want to play for us, which is what I've been trying to get through people's thick heads

So please point out anything I've said that has been inaccurate.

Can you give it a rest mate.
The "I told u so" attitude isn't impressing anyone.
All I've seen from you is some high and mighty attitude.
Wow, congrats... you're pessimistic and moaned and groaned about the tigers trying to sign a star player and it didn't happen.

You predicted correct now you want praise for getting it right? Get outta here kid.

Nice strawman
You must only read what you want to hear, I wanted us to sign him I stated that more than once.
I just didn't believe that he would.
Do you understand the difference?
Keep reading what you want and ignoring what actually write though.

All your recent posts are you having a sook and talking down to people....

#Gronk
Never noticed u as a poster till you started clowning around this thread.
Enoughs enough.

I've been here longer than you have, if you want to play those games, Ive never noticed you either, did you join last week?
 
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085743) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085740) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085724) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085606) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085478) said:
@Dyloh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085469) said:
@TIGER doesn't seem to bother you if you make yourself look like a clown so not sure your why your worried if our Chair looks like an idiot or not.

I've said from the beginning that players like Latrell don't sign with the Tigers.
If you just read Madges comments he clearly explained that we pulled the offer because of Latrells lack of commitment to our club.
Which means Latrell doesn't want to play for us, which is what I've been trying to get through people's thick heads

So please point out anything I've said that has been inaccurate.

Can you give it a rest mate.
The "I told u so" attitude isn't impressing anyone.
All I've seen from you is some high and mighty attitude.
Wow, congrats... you're pessimistic and moaned and groaned about the tigers trying to sign a star player and it didn't happen.

You predicted correct now you want praise for getting it right? Get outta here kid.

Nice strawman
You must only read what you want to hear, I wanted us to sign him I stated that more than once.
I just didn't believe that he would.
Do you understand the difference?
Keep reading what you want and ignoring what actually write though.

All your recent posts are you having a sook and talking down to people....

#Gronk
Never noticed u as a poster till you started clowning around this thread.
Enoughs enough.

I've been here longer than you have, if you want to play those games, Ive never noticed you either, did you join last week?



@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085743) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085740) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085724) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085606) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085478) said:
@Dyloh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085469) said:
@TIGER doesn't seem to bother you if you make yourself look like a clown so not sure your why your worried if our Chair looks like an idiot or not.

I've said from the beginning that players like Latrell don't sign with the Tigers.
If you just read Madges comments he clearly explained that we pulled the offer because of Latrells lack of commitment to our club.
Which means Latrell doesn't want to play for us, which is what I've been trying to get through people's thick heads

So please point out anything I've said that has been inaccurate.

Can you give it a rest mate.
The "I told u so" attitude isn't impressing anyone.
All I've seen from you is some high and mighty attitude.
Wow, congrats... you're pessimistic and moaned and groaned about the tigers trying to sign a star player and it didn't happen.

You predicted correct now you want praise for getting it right? Get outta here kid.

Nice strawman
You must only read what you want to hear, I wanted us to sign him I stated that more than once.
I just didn't believe that he would.
Do you understand the difference?
Keep reading what you want and ignoring what actually write though.

All your recent posts are you having a sook and talking down to people....

#Gronk
Never noticed u as a poster till you started clowning around this thread.
Enoughs enough.

I've been here longer than you have, if you want to play those games, Ive never noticed you either, did you join last week?

You were right all long.
Well done little buddy.

I sussed your recent posts and you've made a fool out of yourself all week... Big noting yourself and acting like you're some legend with inside information. It's clear people have had enough of it....

You're back peddling now by the looks of it with your "I wanted him all along....."
It doesn't even seem like you're a tigers fan tbh.

Anyway I don't care for anything you have to say further after the way you've carried on this week... been here before me and went unnoticed till now but I'll remember the screen name from now on and disregard anything you have to say since you've utterly humiliated yourself with this garbage.

Weekend is upon us. Have a good one.
 
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085747) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085743) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085740) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085724) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085606) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085478) said:
@Dyloh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085469) said:
@TIGER doesn't seem to bother you if you make yourself look like a clown so not sure your why your worried if our Chair looks like an idiot or not.

I've said from the beginning that players like Latrell don't sign with the Tigers.
If you just read Madges comments he clearly explained that we pulled the offer because of Latrells lack of commitment to our club.
Which means Latrell doesn't want to play for us, which is what I've been trying to get through people's thick heads

So please point out anything I've said that has been inaccurate.

Can you give it a rest mate.
The "I told u so" attitude isn't impressing anyone.
All I've seen from you is some high and mighty attitude.
Wow, congrats... you're pessimistic and moaned and groaned about the tigers trying to sign a star player and it didn't happen.

You predicted correct now you want praise for getting it right? Get outta here kid.

Nice strawman
You must only read what you want to hear, I wanted us to sign him I stated that more than once.
I just didn't believe that he would.
Do you understand the difference?
Keep reading what you want and ignoring what actually write though.

All your recent posts are you having a sook and talking down to people....

#Gronk
Never noticed u as a poster till you started clowning around this thread.
Enoughs enough.

I've been here longer than you have, if you want to play those games, Ive never noticed you either, did you join last week?



@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085743) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085740) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085724) said:
@Demps said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085606) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085478) said:
@Dyloh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085469) said:
@TIGER doesn't seem to bother you if you make yourself look like a clown so not sure your why your worried if our Chair looks like an idiot or not.

I've said from the beginning that players like Latrell don't sign with the Tigers.
If you just read Madges comments he clearly explained that we pulled the offer because of Latrells lack of commitment to our club.
Which means Latrell doesn't want to play for us, which is what I've been trying to get through people's thick heads

So please point out anything I've said that has been inaccurate.

Can you give it a rest mate.
The "I told u so" attitude isn't impressing anyone.
All I've seen from you is some high and mighty attitude.
Wow, congrats... you're pessimistic and moaned and groaned about the tigers trying to sign a star player and it didn't happen.

You predicted correct now you want praise for getting it right? Get outta here kid.

Nice strawman
You must only read what you want to hear, I wanted us to sign him I stated that more than once.
I just didn't believe that he would.
Do you understand the difference?
Keep reading what you want and ignoring what actually write though.

All your recent posts are you having a sook and talking down to people....

#Gronk
Never noticed u as a poster till you started clowning around this thread.
Enoughs enough.

I've been here longer than you have, if you want to play those games, Ive never noticed you either, did you join last week?

You were right all long.
Well done little buddy.

I sussed your recent posts and you've made a fool out of yourself all week... Big noting yourself and acting like you're some legend with inside information. It's clear people have had enough of it....

You're back peddling now by the looks of it with your "I wanted him all along....."
It doesn't even seem like you're a tigers fan tbh.

Anyway I don't care for anything you have to say further after the way you've carried on this week... been here before me and went unnoticed till now but I'll remember the screen name from now on and disregard anything you have to say since you've utterly humiliated yourself with this garbage.

Weekend is upon us. Have a good one.

So why would I sook if I was right?

I must have missed your answer.
 
@happy_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085518) said:
Biggest problem now as I mentioned before we pulled the offer is we now HAVE to spend around 1.1 million before June 30 (I believe) or we will get fined for not spending enough of our cap 94%

If we lose either Reynolds or McQueen that figure gets higher .....if you rule out players contracted for 2020 ........ouch .......cupboards bare Mother Hubbard

Look at you now Donkey Kong...1st it was Mitchell was not the right player to tie up a million dollars in where other areas need strengthening 1st...now it's we have too much money..lol
 
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085738) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085728) said:
Not sure why you'd get off on being right about the club missing a bit name, regardless of whether you "wanted it to happen" or not. Weird flex TBH.

How could you possibly know that I'm getting off on it?
For the last time I WAS IN FAVOUR OF HIM BEING SIGNED!!!!!!

You guys read your own narritive into things.
You want someone to take your frustrations out on and it seems like it's me.

Please answer this question; "If he didn't want to come to the Tigers why did he give the club the runaround for nearly a month". He acts like a spoilt self entitled with very little respect.
 
@Bula said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085695) said:
Just talking to someone who knows Latrell and was talking to him today. What happened was that Chooks wanted to extend his contract and he told them to wait until next year. Other players such as Tedesco in same boat. Things then slightly turned to c**p and with the media beat up other clubs came calling. He listened to what they had to say - why not do that? As far as he is concerned he has a contract for next year and expects to be playing at Chooks when they kiss and make up.

Well he has to tell his mates and his Mrs something when they come up and ask; "You idiot, why did you knock back a million a year?
Sorry but I'm with Hbom on this one.
 
For those not wishing to read this topic simply go down to watching click on it and select ignoring and it wont come up in your feed at all..

We do not make a habit of locking topics..
 
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085722) said:
@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085513) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085262) said:
So now we're saying the door is still open???

If we've pulled the offer the door should be closed, otherwise what does it actually mean to pull the offer?

This is just ridiculous now.

We've either closed the door or we haven't, if we haven't, then the offer hasn't been pulled.

Seems like he's called our bluff


Its not actually that hard to understand. The Tigers made an offer. If Latrell accepted that offer, they have a contract and pretty much both parties are bound to it. So for arguments sake Tigers could offer JAC $600K becuase if Latrell accepts his offer, Tigers are bound to it and would be buggered.

Tigers withdraw their offer, therefore Latrell cant accept it. Nothing stopping them talking in the future, but there is no offer and Tigers are free to pursue other options.

Whats ridiculous about any of that. Its professional, its business.

What's ridiculous is Latrell isn't interested in becoming a Tiger and he's playing us like fools and we're "leaving the door open" for him to wipe his feet on us again.
As I said, there's a lot of slow learners on this forum.


How is he playing us for fools? We have withdrawn our offer, he has not offer from us and without genuine interest in playing for us has nothing to do with us. We have literally nothing to do with Latrell Mitchell and he is playing us for fools?
 
@Newtown said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085756) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085738) said:
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085728) said:
Not sure why you'd get off on being right about the club missing a bit name, regardless of whether you "wanted it to happen" or not. Weird flex TBH.

How could you possibly know that I'm getting off on it?
For the last time I WAS IN FAVOUR OF HIM BEING SIGNED!!!!!!

You guys read your own narritive into things.
You want someone to take your frustrations out on and it seems like it's me.

Please answer this question; "If he didn't want to come to the Tigers why did he give the club the runaround for nearly a month". He acts like a spoilt self entitled with very little respect.

That's a question for him not me, how could I possibly know.

If he did want to be here, why isn't he?
 
@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085762) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085722) said:
@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085513) said:
@TIGER said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085262) said:
So now we're saying the door is still open???

If we've pulled the offer the door should be closed, otherwise what does it actually mean to pull the offer?

This is just ridiculous now.

We've either closed the door or we haven't, if we haven't, then the offer hasn't been pulled.

Seems like he's called our bluff


Its not actually that hard to understand. The Tigers made an offer. If Latrell accepted that offer, they have a contract and pretty much both parties are bound to it. So for arguments sake Tigers could offer JAC $600K becuase if Latrell accepts his offer, Tigers are bound to it and would be buggered.

Tigers withdraw their offer, therefore Latrell cant accept it. Nothing stopping them talking in the future, but there is no offer and Tigers are free to pursue other options.

Whats ridiculous about any of that. Its professional, its business.

What's ridiculous is Latrell isn't interested in becoming a Tiger and he's playing us like fools and we're "leaving the door open" for him to wipe his feet on us again.
As I said, there's a lot of slow learners on this forum.


How is he playing us for fools? We have withdrawn our offer, he has not offer from us and without genuine interest in playing for us has nothing to do with us. We have literally nothing to do with Latrell Mitchell and he is playing us for fools?

Because we're leaving the door open for him to wipe his feet on us again.

We're trying to come across as if we're the ones who ended the relationship, but if he wants to come crawling back we'll take him back.

We're that sucker in a relationship who keeps taking the dead beat partner back even though they're only coming back because they have nowhere else to go.
Kick him out but make sure he's still got a key to the backdoor
 
@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085760) said:
For those not wishing to read this topic simply go down to watching click on it and select ignoring and it wont come up in your feed at all..

We do not make a habit of locking topics..

I think I might go hang out in the "Get Best Awning" thread for a while instead.
 
@supercoach said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1085753) said:
Time to put Tiger to bed

If you don't like what I'm writing, don't read it.

It's a forum, you can't silence people just because you don't agree with them.
 
The thing that erks me the most is there was no contract signed or imminent signing as many claimed was on the way.

From the start this always looked like LM wasn’t happy with rooster offer and was leveraging the market to up it. Plus on social he had lots of statements about being contracted for next year and no rush.

Even if he starts in reggies he won’t stay there long. Once he plays well and everything is Rossy he will sign up and all forgotten. Obvious
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top