avocadoontoast
Well-known member
@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090311) said:Would he have time for a bit of parading? It's the clubs biggest ever signing, it won't be just an announcement.
Not necessarily.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090311) said:Would he have time for a bit of parading? It's the clubs biggest ever signing, it won't be just an announcement.
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090318) said:I’m OK with him taking his time.
@Cultured_Bogan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090318) said:I'm OK with him taking his time. At the end of the day, when the club you've been at since you were sixteen the other 15 clubs are all the same. He has no allegiance or loyalty to us, the Titans, Souths or anyone. I don't blame him for wanting to take the time to weigh his options.
It's the media speculation that is turning this into a circus. In a roundabout way, we're responsible for that because a lot of us desperately want a player of his calibre, in the past that we would never would be in contention for.
@jirskyr said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090320) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090318) said:I’m OK with him taking his time.
Same, would anyone on the forum move so fast on one of the biggest decisions of your life?
Would you also sign on the dotted line unless you were 100% sure all offers were in and you'd properly considered every option?
I wouldn't be surprised at all if LM waited until at least Souths threw their hat in the ring, post Burgess, to see what was on the table.
Because you are a mug if you sign the first and only official offer, when you don't really need to rush. LM is still being paid by the Roosters and legit preseason training for rep players doesn't start until January.
Doesn't matter if he decides today or January 5, he can't actually play football until the trials.
@jirskyr said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090320) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090318) said:I’m OK with him taking his time.
Same, would anyone on the forum move so fast on one of the biggest decisions of your life?
Would you also sign on the dotted line unless you were 100% sure all offers were in and you'd properly considered every option?
I wouldn't be surprised at all if LM waited until at least Souths threw their hat in the ring, post Burgess, to see what was on the table.
Because you are a mug if you sign the first and only official offer, when you don't really need to rush. LM is still being paid by the Roosters and legit preseason training for rep players doesn't start until January.
Doesn't matter if he decides today or January 5, he can't actually play football until the trials.
@happy_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090334) said:But we aren't signing Latrell Mitchell
Christian Nicolussi says it himself in the SMH
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/embattled-mitchell-to-meet-with-fittler-in-taree-next-week-20191212-p53jfh.html
@cochise said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090237) said:@Leck said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090233) said:Thanks fellas.
Totally agree, he can kick and he's a big body that can get over the line, but I'm also a fan of our youth.
I think we need to build WT internally first.
We tried that and it didn't work.
@WT2K said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090355) said:The day of Latrell
@happy_tiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090360) said:I'd say the JR issue has probably put a kibosh on any signings this week
@boonboon said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090358) said:All the people saying "if he is only coming for the money then we dont want him". 1. Its a job everyone only comes for the money otherwise itd be a hobby or a volunteer orgnaisation. 2. If he comes for the money then thank god because if he was signing for - facilities, record of achievment, home ground, lifestyle, quality of footy team then none of those things would get him too us. We literally need him to want to come for the money its all we have
@boonboon said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090358) said:All the people saying "if he is only coming for the money then we dont want him". 1. Its a job everyone only comes for the money otherwise itd be a hobby or a volunteer orgnaisation. 2. If he comes for the money then thank god because if he was signing for - facilities, record of achievment, home ground, lifestyle, quality of footy team then none of those things would get him too us. We literally need him to want to come for the money its all we have