Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.


My sentiments also. Does anyone know what their cut of the contract is? It must be over the top if Rushton wanted $140k to let go of Mitchell?
 
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.
 
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.
 
Anyway, Rugby League May be a business but it is first and foremost a sport.
Looking at the posts here I can see, fans are hurting and the attempted demoralising efforts on behalf of Mitchell and Bennet are well and truly on display. There is no need for that. ☹️
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Ohhhh
How glorious it would be if souths miss finals
 
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.


Maybe
Curious to see what the figure is on paper

Call me crazy but next year the tigers are playing finals footy ?
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Seems a stretch...
 
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097581) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Seems a stretch...

I agree. And was reported I believe by Andrew Webster so unlikely to be true.
 
The NRL will rubberstamp the contract no matter the difference between offers from souffs and any other club with only the slightest of murmering.Little consistency as always
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Latest story in 9 is that the Roosters have granted him leave not to attend training and functions. It sounds like he will be moved to Special Projects.
 
If the Grubbitohs pay out the the contract between LM and Rushton as suggested in the article and then he signs with them the payout figure should be included in his cap number this season.
 
**Roosters grant Latrell 'leave of absence' from pre-season training**
NRL.comSun 5 Jan 2020, 07:05 PM
The Sydney Roosters have announced Latrell Mitchell has been granted a leave of absence on the eve of the club’s return to pre-season training.

With uncertainty surrounding the Test centre’s playing future, the club on Sunday night issued a statement to say he would not be required when the squad assembles for the first time in 2020.

“Sydney Roosters player Latrell Mitchell has been granted a leave of absence, excusing him from all training commitments. The club will be making no further comment at this time.”

Mitchell, who is contracted to the premiers for the 2020 season, has been linked to a switch to South Sydney, Wests Tigers and the Gold Coast Titans in recent weeks.

The 23-year-old has been a key member of the club’s back-to-back premiership wins but it appears unlikely he will be suiting up for the Roosters in their bid to become the first team since the 1983 Parramatta Eels to win three straight titles.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Or the $800k his current club and 2 time premiers offered, there is no way the NRL could allow that if they are not corrupt
 
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097579) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.


Maybe
Curious to see what the figure is on paper

Call me crazy but next year the tigers are playing finals footy ?

With virtually the same roster ?
Good luck!
 
@851 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097625) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Or the $800k his current club and 2 time premiers offered, there is no way the NRL could allow that if they are not corrupt

But they are corrupt

That's what everyone fails to understand

THEY ARE CORRUPT

THE NRL CEO USED TO RUN THE BULLDOGS

THEY ARE CORRUPT
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

There's simply no way the nrl could register a contract like that. Red flags galore.

One of the highest profile players in the comp, knocks back offers of 800k from the current premiers and $1 Mil from a top8 challenger. For him to accept a one year deal at less than half his market value makes a mockery of the league, the salary cap, the player, and has extreme suspicions of illegal payments.
 
@balmain-boy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097663) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

There's simply no way the nrl could register a contract like that. Red flags galore.

One of the highest profile players in the comp, knocks back offers of 800k from the current premiers and $1 Mil from a top8 challenger. For him to accept a one year deal at less than half his market value makes a mockery of the league, the salary cap, the player, and has extreme suspicions of illegal payments.

It would probably pass Turdbergs "fairness not equality" test
 
@tiger05premier said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097643) said:
@851 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097625) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Or the $800k his current club and 2 time premiers offered, there is no way the NRL could allow that if they are not corrupt

But they are corrupt

That's what everyone fails to understand

THEY ARE CORRUPT

THE NRL CEO USED TO RUN THE BULLDOGS

THEY ARE CORRUPT

Sarcastic? Can't tell.
 
@tiger05premier said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097643) said:
@851 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097625) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097574) said:
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097572) said:
@Sausagesorcerer said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1097568) said:
I just hope for latrell and his young family that he is getting his million a year, like we could of given him.
These player managers are ruining the game something fierce.

He might be happier getting $800k and playing consistent finals footy.

Latest story is he’s moving to Souths for 1 year at $400k. Apparently it was more attractive to him than the $1m+ per season offer we presented.

Or the $800k his current club and 2 time premiers offered, there is no way the NRL could allow that if they are not corrupt

But they are corrupt

That's what everyone fails to understand

THEY ARE CORRUPT

THE NRL CEO USED TO RUN THE BULLDOGS

THEY ARE CORRUPT

I think you are right, they are either corrupt or incompetent, or both, they are certainly not impartial
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top