Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099429) said:
@coivtny said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099424) said:
As usual, Latrell has split the forum between those who want him and those who don't. Those who argue that, at his best, Latrell is a star are correct but the more I think about it the more I wouldn't touch him with a barge pole. I don't think he's ready to commit to three or four years of solid effort. I think he's looking to get some more money and get out. Can't blame him if that's what he wants but it means we should forget him and spend our money where we'll get value for money.

When you have over $1m to spend 2 months before the season starts we don't need to be looking for good value. We need to be looking for the best player possible, even if it means spending slightly above market.

+ marquee players attract other marquee players. People want to win.
 
Yep see ya later. Next...

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/latrell-and-rabbitohs-a-done-deal-but-superstar-forced-into-big-pay-cut/news-story/5334d73b666704f27d88b2b3da730e5b
 
@dazza65 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099441) said:
Finally the circus is over - LM signs with Souffs via Foxsports - 2 year deal.

Whilst Foxsports are often wrong it is seeming like he's gone to Souths. The best possible case for us for 2020 is for Stefano to get a release and sign AJ. We'll have a LOT of cash left over too.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099444) said:
@dazza65 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099441) said:
Finally the circus is over - LM signs with Souffs via Foxsports - 2 year deal.

Whilst Foxsports are often wrong it is seeming like he's gone to Souths. The best possible case for us for 2020 is for Stefano to get a release and sign AJ. We'll have a LOT of cash left over too.

Leftover cash - make a play for JAC. Provide the Storm with some kind of monetary payment for release in 2021.
 
I don't care that he's ended up at Souths. the big thing here is that the NRL's so called auditors have allowed a player who's market value is at LEAST $800k to sign on the dotted line for half that. this new chairman apparently doesn't suffer fools and this happens right under his rule. the NRL is pathetic.
 
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099404) said:
Souths win, we lose and end up with the booby prize AJ - surprise, surprise, what's new? Can we move onto something else now.


80 try’s in 120 games. A real boob 🤔
 
I can understand that Souths went for him at the price quoted but now they are kind of overstocked on back line talent.
Especially fullback centre positions.
But you are not going to tell me that they are going to win next years com with that pack. Arrow or no Arrow.
 
I see the kings of click bait, Fox Sports are at it again, claiming he was forced to take a pay cut. Wrong. He chose to by signing with them. He could have written his own check if he signed with us.
 
@Roar_Power said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099447) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099444) said:
@dazza65 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099441) said:
Finally the circus is over - LM signs with Souffs via Foxsports - 2 year deal.

Whilst Foxsports are often wrong it is seeming like he's gone to Souths. The best possible case for us for 2020 is for Stefano to get a release and sign AJ. We'll have a LOT of cash left over too.

Leftover cash - make a play for JAC. Provide the Storm with some kind of monetary payment for release in 2021.

JAC will end up with his mate Latrell back at Souths I reckon.
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099455) said:
@Roar_Power said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099447) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099444) said:
@dazza65 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099441) said:
Finally the circus is over - LM signs with Souffs via Foxsports - 2 year deal.

Whilst Foxsports are often wrong it is seeming like he's gone to Souths. The best possible case for us for 2020 is for Stefano to get a release and sign AJ. We'll have a LOT of cash left over too.

Leftover cash - make a play for JAC. Provide the Storm with some kind of monetary payment for release in 2021.

JAC will end up with his mate Latrell back at Souths I reckon.


They won’t have the space.
 
@momo_amp_medo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099451) said:
I can understand that Souths went for him at the price quoted but now they are kind of overstocked on back line talent.
Especially fullback centre positions.
But you are not going to tell me that they are going to win next years com with that pack. Arrow or no Arrow.

I agree. They're backs are fantastic but their forward pack hasn't got a lot of depth to it.
 
@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099456) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099455) said:
@Roar_Power said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099447) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099444) said:
@dazza65 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099441) said:
Finally the circus is over - LM signs with Souffs via Foxsports - 2 year deal.

Whilst Foxsports are often wrong it is seeming like he's gone to Souths. The best possible case for us for 2020 is for Stefano to get a release and sign AJ. We'll have a LOT of cash left over too.

Leftover cash - make a play for JAC. Provide the Storm with some kind of monetary payment for release in 2021.

JAC will end up with his mate Latrell back at Souths I reckon.


They won’t have the space.

I believe we said that about Mitchell.
 
Souths sign Latrell and Arrow

We have double there money and sign Luciano and supposedly AJ

Gotta love being a tigers fan
 
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099458) said:
@GNR4LIFE said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099456) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099455) said:
@Roar_Power said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099447) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099444) said:
@dazza65 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099441) said:
Finally the circus is over - LM signs with Souffs via Foxsports - 2 year deal.

Whilst Foxsports are often wrong it is seeming like he's gone to Souths. The best possible case for us for 2020 is for Stefano to get a release and sign AJ. We'll have a LOT of cash left over too.

Leftover cash - make a play for JAC. Provide the Storm with some kind of monetary payment for release in 2021.

JAC will end up with his mate Latrell back at Souths I reckon.


They won’t have the space.

I believe we said that about Mitchell.

Why aren’t they paying him more for this year then? Cos they can’t. So how do they sign JAC?
 
Apart from the fact I hate Souths... I don't understand why the big attraction to playing under Bennett is :man-shrugging:
He is like 70 years old and will be retiring soon , has not done anything in the last 6 years with some good teams , Turned England into a laughing stock for International games.... I cannot believe the NRL are approving this as he has to be getting brown bags from somewhere... NRL is becoming a joke ( My Rant over ) ..

Anyway just another off season of excitement with all our money and nothing :man-gesturing-no:
 
Am I reading that Fox article correctly? South's paid $55k for Mitchell to pay out his agent on the condition that the new agent go through with Mitchell signing at South's? Geez, that's highly, highly suss and unethical. That should but won't raise red flags at NRL HQ especially with their supposed crack down on agents and ethical behaviour.
 
@2005magic said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1099464) said:
Am I reading that Fox article correctly? South's paid $55k for Mitchell to pay out his agent on the condition that the new agent go through with Mitchell signing at South's? Geez, that's highly, highly suss and unethical. That should but won't raise red flags at NRL HQ especially with their supposed crack down on agents and ethical behaviour.

Agree very, very sketchy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top