Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
@OzLuke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083568) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083565) said:
@ElleryHanley perhaps we should do that too moving forward.

then the forum would be in an uproar as to why we are showing no interest in anything.....can't win either way hahaha

It’s better than declaring your interest and then getting shafted.
 
@Bones said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083572) said:
I said before we were first linked to Latrell that I wouldn’t sign him based on his inflated price. I still believe that is true.

For $1M a season you have to be the best player on you team every other week. Latrell has only ever proved he can do it occasionally. For me he is only worth $1M when he has proven he can do it every week like Tedesco, Taumalolo and RTS.

At this stage I’d use $1M to peruse both Lomax and JAC. Far less risk IMO.

If we get him I hope he proves we wrong. If we don’t I hope he proves me right 😂

Agree with all of this.Yes he is a good player but throwing 1m + a year at him will not get us what we need at the club.
 
@teddy23 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083553) said:
Just gonna put this here:

Bunnies boss Shane Richardson bizarrely suggested Mitchell should remain at the Roosters.

“We might be linked to him but we have never spoken to him, never spoken to his manager — I don’t even know who it is — and we have no interest in him,” Richardson told the Telegraph.

Maybe Mitchell has no other options but to pressure us for bigger $ before signing

Or maybe rabbits playing games to get him cheaper

Who knows
 
@Sabre said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083498) said:
@yeahcaz said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083490) said:
Wow everyone is so defeated all of a sudden. Still waiting to see one of these Souths posts...

![alt text](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EKMLz7LUwAAVTq6?format=jpg&name=medium)

This looks so dodgy, a tweet from some guy who calls himself "a conspiracy theorist against the NRL" and he's since deleted it

Credibility I'd give it a 1 out of 10
 
@finnzo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083581) said:
How good would it be to actually no what was going on haha so much speculation who knows what to believe

how good is it going to be when it's over.......never a dull moment....don't want to read but can't help myself
 
Yeah I cannot wait till some one comes out and actually gives us the truth in a press conference or something haha hopefully it happens haha and yeah it’s gonna be a relaxing feeling haha
 
Remember when Tacky posted on Parra’s forum that he had it on good authority that Tedesco had signed with them over the Roosters at the 11th hour? Good times.
 
Do the Rabbitohs even have salary cap dispensation from the Burgess retirement yet?

By the letter of the law, it won't be granted because the injury occurred prior to his new contract being signed.

Even so, let's say the Rabbits buy Mitchell on $1 Million per season...they then can't get Semi or Addo-Carr....I'd be happy with either of those for $500k and a new forward if the LM deal falls through.
 
@Tiger-Tragic said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083586) said:
I don't know enough about Mitchell and his advising group, but I think the last thing the'yd want is for him to be seen to take the last option available; i.e. signing with WT.

Hardly a positive news story for Latrell if it's contrued that way in the media. On the other hand, it could motivate him to prove them wrong?

Pure speculation. My gut feeling is, he will go elsewhere.

Being slammed by all and sundry for the way he has handled this contract saga is hardly painting him in a better light.

I'd say the longer this goes on and the more of these stories that come out his value drops. Not just in terms of his next contract but also in terms of his worth to potential sponsors.
 
@weststigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083591) said:
Do the Rabbitohs even have salary cap dispensation from the Burgess retirement yet?

By the letter of the law, it won't be granted because the injury occurred prior to his new contract being signed.

Even so, let's say the Rabbits buy Mitchell on $1 Million per season...they then can't get Semi or Addo-Carr....I'd be happy with either of those for $500k and a new forward if the LM deal falls through.

It feels like some are just trying to find excuses for the Rabbitohs to be in a position to sign Latrell. As you said, there’s no way Burgess should be medically retired, the injury was clearly pre existing. It’s really clutching at straws.. Meanwhile we haven’t broke (our comparatively large) bank on any signing as of yet, and some how we’re apparently no chance.. Lol, ok.
 
There is nothing stopping Souff's from signing Mitchell from 2021 as he is a free agent..

Stay at the Rorters in 2020 collect 14K a week go fishing thanks Unca..
 
@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083595) said:
@snowy55 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1083594) said:
That is so true no pom for a while now

More to worry about in NZ..

Innings and 65 run defeat. How good ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top