Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've given up trying to make sense of bits of info / propaganda in the public forum. My only thinking now is that if it's true Maguire has gone overseas,and from his and WT previously stated fact that they pulled negotiations due to Mitchell's refusal to meet with Maguire either:

a/ WT have signed Mitchell and he has met Maguire or
b/ no meeting with Maguire and WT remain out of the circus for Mitchell signature.

Friday's Q and A should answer.
 
@05wt05 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091029) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091024) said:
@05wt05 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091011) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090965) said:
@TigerSkins said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090960) said:
Souffs circling .. let's see how tough the Rorters are after they declared they would not release Mitchell this year to the Bunnies .. !!

Bunnies are now cashed up after the NRL released the Burgess salary back to them .. so will it be Arrow or Mitchell .. or both to the Bunnies.

Who says they’re circling? I’ve seen a number of news Ltd articles saying they are now real chances but I haven’t seen a direct quote or even talk of a meeting...seems that they’re just creating their own dialogue as they have nothing else to write about.

After the media beat up about Cleary tirned out to be true avo, im now a firm beleiver wheres theres smoke theres some sort of fire.

By that logic you must be certain he's signing with us seeing as 90% of the articles written about LM suggest him signing with us is the most logical option?

The media are grubs. Generally speaking though they may be off the mark but they dont just pull things out of thin air and invent stories, the info they use is coming from somewhere.

Actually they do. The vast majority of stories published are pure fiction based on rumours from forums such as this one, or an opinion piece painted as facts by a journo desperate to keep their job
 
@Strongee said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091012) said:
@Snake said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091010) said:
Madge has left the building what does that tell you !
Literally nothing ! It tells you nothing . Could be his planned leave from 13 months ago . Could be in the UK looking at poms . Could be it’s done and he is sipping Pina colada’s in a beach somewhere. Could be we now have 2 mil open after the JR mistake , and some absolute monster players are available.
Worst case scenario is next year we have a kings ransom to throw around after front loading mills worth of contracts.
Who cares it’s Christmas, just relax ! The drought will break ! And it is a drought . Zero players at the top end have signed . Not one of the top players.

Mitchell - unsigned
Wighton - unsigned
Arrow - unsigned
Fifita - unsigned
And that’s off the top of my head .
Just relax !

If we don't get any of these players we should all chill as well. Players are going to come up even if we just purchase juniors and see what happens. Our cap isn't that bad and we have Reynolds, Packer and McQueen who all appear to be overpaid and potentially Mbye as well. We can attract players it's about getting the right players. If that takes time and we don't stuff our cap up so be it.

Mitchell to me is the player most likely to improve our team out of the players available but he appears risky at the moment mostly due to his temperament. This isn't a superstar player coming to you fit and raring to go. He sounds like he is a bit of a mess right now. If he is overweight and unmotivated he may be a distraction for any team.

To me best case out of that list we get Mitchell but if we don't stuff the cap up and we are in the race over the next couple of seasons I'm cool with it.
 
@Spud_Murphy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090995) said:
@Moh said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090978) said:
@Telltails said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090976) said:
How long do you think Canberra have taken to sign Wighton and still havnt done the deal? The T Brothers were in negotiations with Manly for months before they committed. Really think the reaction to the time frame is over the top.

Yes, but it was all the 'inside sources' saying it was done about a month ago that has led to the frustration.


Absolutely!

I'm not sure whether they said it was a "done deal" or a "dumb deal".
 
@2005magic said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091030) said:
I've given up trying to make sense of bits of info / propaganda in the public forum. My only thinking now is that if it's true Maguire has gone overseas,and from his and WT previously stated fact that they pulled negotiations due to Mitchell's refusal to meet with Maguire either:

a/ WT have signed Mitchell and he has met Maguire or
b/ no meeting with Maguire and WT remain out of the circus for Mitchell signature.

Friday's Q and A should answer.

The Q and A is on Wednesday not Friday.
 
@balmain-boy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091035) said:
@05wt05 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091029) said:
@balmain-boy said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091024) said:
@05wt05 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091011) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090965) said:
@TigerSkins said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090960) said:
Souffs circling .. let's see how tough the Rorters are after they declared they would not release Mitchell this year to the Bunnies .. !!

Bunnies are now cashed up after the NRL released the Burgess salary back to them .. so will it be Arrow or Mitchell .. or both to the Bunnies.

Who says they’re circling? I’ve seen a number of news Ltd articles saying they are now real chances but I haven’t seen a direct quote or even talk of a meeting...seems that they’re just creating their own dialogue as they have nothing else to write about.

After the media beat up about Cleary tirned out to be true avo, im now a firm beleiver wheres theres smoke theres some sort of fire.

By that logic you must be certain he's signing with us seeing as 90% of the articles written about LM suggest him signing with us is the most logical option?

The media are grubs. Generally speaking though they may be off the mark but they dont just pull things out of thin air and invent stories, the info they use is coming from somewhere.

Actually they do. The vast majority of stories published are pure fiction based on rumours from forums such as this one, or an opinion piece painted as facts by a journo desperate to keep their job

Like how they were lying about Cleary or Matterson wanting out. I apologise but i disagree i dont believe they totally make things up i tend to believe that their sources are off the mark.
 
I can't do the mental gymnastics on the timing of the Q&A.

Is it just random? was it booked in to that date prior to LM saga?
If it was to announce anything I would expect some information to be leaked in the media by now. In saying that, every day some "insider" sprouts something, who knows.
Would Madge be there if it was to announce such a big signing? Unless his trip was planned prior to the LM saga and the club is the one that wants to break the news. Or, there is no news and this is just a scheduled event.
Are they having it because of the LM saga and they just want to put it to bed for the Xmas shutdown.

The club has to know that they are gunna be hammered with questions about signings, if they didn't have anything to announce why do it? Or maybe it is a proactive move to categorically put it to bed.


Jesus, this is taking up way too much of my bandwidth. I hope there's an answer one way or the other.
 
I don’t think the Q/A has anything to do with a final decision on Latrell

Our last Q/A was right in the middle of the Matterson drama and we just said the typical “he’s contracted for next year blah blah”

If there’s a Latrell question, they’ll probs hit us with a “we’ve withdrew our offer because we want to be active in the market, but are still interested”
 
@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091067) said:
@Spacecub said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091066) said:
He's not coming here....time to lock this boring thread again...yawn

Source?.?

it'll happen in 48 hours
 
@TheDaBoss said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091067) said:
@Spacecub said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091066) said:
He's not coming here....time to lock this boring thread again...yawn

Source?.?

Just my gut feeling boss man
 
If we're offering top, top coin, and the talk is he will take unders to play for rabbits, then we don't need the roof to fall in on our heads again......
 
@Telltails said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090976) said:
How long do you think Canberra have taken to sign Wighton and still havnt done the deal? The T Brothers were in negotiations with Manly for months before they committed. Really think the reaction to the time frame is over the top.

Agree and I dont.

Finalising a contract can take a while but in our case he is hanging out to see if there are any other offers.

He doesn't want us and I dont want him especially if it is o. Premium dollar's
 
Jake Friend today quoted as saying he expects Lattrell to make a decision "over the Christmas break"....zzzzz.

Wouldn't take that as gospel though.
 
@Compass said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091092) said:
Jake Friend today quoted as saying he expects Lattrell to make a decision "over the Christmas break"....zzzzz.

Wouldn't take that as gospel though.

I'm sorry but we honestly can't wait that long

We need to be making any moves for 2020 now
 
@Spartan117 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1091091) said:
@Telltails said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090976) said:
How long do you think Canberra have taken to sign Wighton and still havnt done the deal? The T Brothers were in negotiations with Manly for months before they committed. Really think the reaction to the time frame is over the top.

Agree and I dont.

Finalising a contract can take a while but in our case he is hanging out to see if there are any other offers.

He doesn't want us and I dont want him especially if it is o. Premium dollar's

If he doesn't want to sign with us pretty sure the club and Maguire would know that better than anyone. It's not as if we as a club have come out and changed position on it. If Latrell is interested he needs to come to us and if he doesn't, we have lost nothing and move on.
 
I don't know who there is to move on to? If Latrell doesn't sign, we promote some youngsters come January/February, front load some of our bigger contracts, and go nuts next year.

So really, we can wait till mid February really for Latrell to ultimately knock us back. If an opportunity comes up we can grab it, regardless of what Latrell's doing.

But gee this forum isn't going to make it till February with Latrell still umming and ahhing...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top