@Cairnstigers said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1090904) said:
$700,000 year 1
$1,300,000 year 2
$1,300,000 year 3 clubs option
Take it or take off
Our club needs balls
And not footballs either
If the deal is not already done then we need to cut all ties and move on
Take up a few of the best off contract players on 12 month deals and make them work for a longer contract
Big clean out in 2021 and we try and start again with a vault full of money
Nooo!
So we have money now. We have maybe 2 players worth 700K. Next two years we could be trying to retain someone. We should do the exact opposite. Get someone we know is good and frontload that contract while we have the cash. Then in the next 2-3 years we will actually have the cash to build the team.
Yeah, could get another Matterson, pay him huge dollars upfront and then be forced to let him go when the stone kicking starts, as he demands more cash for the following season/s.
Seriously watch this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6XAPnuFjJc&t=496s
it explains true motivation far better then I can.
But too that. Offer Latrell 1.3 million the first season then a 3 year contract of 750k. Why, this buys Latrell a house. The guy is dizzy with money and offers and he has traveled to other clubs going; facilities not as good as Easts, culture worse, not making the top 8, etc.
When Josh Reynolds came here, we sold him how it is. Were rebuilding, we need an older player to guide the younger players. Come join our team and play this key role.
Latrell we need a similar narrative. He is thinking Souths because they offer GI and himself to be a leader, a rolemodel, something more then a footballer. Offer more money upfront, explain that he can either get used to the high life or have some assets behind him when he retires. Explain where he is strong and where he is weak as a player and how Madge will take him to the next level.
^ notice how the above sounds really weak. That's why we won't get Latrell. That's also why I suspect Souths will sign him for 500k or the Roosters will take him back for 600k. Yes we will still be ready for him to sign for 1M and he will take less money to go to a club that offers him culture, development and a good playing group....
how do we be that club?
Couldn't get past the first minute or two, as I just can't listen to this sort of stuff. I am always for bottom up approach.
But it doesn’t work! ??? Not really. On narcissistic people , It will work . But not for the reasons you think . Ie. the desire to be better than everyone around them , to earn more than everyone around them to have more than everyone around them etc. it’s about feeling superior.
Most people just want to pay the bills, feel valued and contribute to something.
So the incentive is to have more control over their own existence , rather than here’s a bag of cash now STFU.
It gets old real quick .
Re Bottom up approach vs others.
" rather than here’s a bag of cash now STFU.
It gets old real quick ."
I cannot agree more, which is why I posted the video.
Take a guy like Jamal Idris, who wanted Man of the match to buy an Old Kombie van with the 2K and travel Australia.
You see his aim, you see his thoughts and where he was at. Cash at Penrith, Titans and eventually here did not get him the quality of life he wanted.
We have a bunch of footballers who love playing football. We cannot sign the best talent on Money alone. Lazarus was saying why he went to the Broncos "They were at the top of their game, but they were having Fun. I hadn't had fun in all the years I was playing".