I'd forgotten about that man..
Is he the same bloke who ate his shoe..
Is he the same bloke who ate his shoe..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Our guys are busting their guts at training, I suppose this Prima Donna is kicking back then will waltz in when he’s ready to pick up a pen - make sure our offer is performance based.@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098773) said:From the Forgotten Man on FB
BREAKING NEWS
The Latrell Mitchell drama is set to be finished in the upcoming week, the reports coming out Latrell will be at the Rabbitohs 100% by Monday are all false.
I cannot stress this enough!
Latrell has not signed with anyone at this point!
He has switched managers, his old manager being a core reason the Wests Tigers pulled their offer to begin with which is worrying for Latrell.
Latrell’s new manager Matt Rose, will meet with both Rabbitohs and the Wests Tigers all within this week in order to start fresh contract negotiations.
As I’ve reported in the past, Rabbitohs can not put forward a legitimate deal towards Latrell unless they offload Johnston and Gagai (new post upcoming about Johnston later today) this seems very unlikely to occur at this moment of time.
400k is the reported figure they can offer, while the Wests Tigers offer is around the 1mil mark.... even if Latrell does choose the Rabbitohs another hurdle or potential setback will be on whether the NRL register his contract as they may deem the offer to be significantly under the market value.
I’m being told the Wests Tigers are about to step up their pursuit on Latrell and go in hard!
Latrell does have an interest in joining the Tigers that’s for sure, hence why I reported that it was a 99% chance of happening as I didn’t think Latrell would have even considered a deal of 400k with South Sydney - whether or not he will accept this deal no one knows!
I’m not too sure on Latrell’s interest levels on joining Souths are, I’m assuming quite high as it seems he is seriously considering this reduced 1 year deal.
Personally, I think he will be at the Wests Tigers due to the money being too good to refuse.
With fresh contract negotiations starting over with a new manager, this could be a blessing in disguise for the Wests Tigers as Latrell at one point had verbally agreed to a deal roughly a month ago but was blocked off by his former manager Wayde Rushton.
Regardless of the media dictating where Latrell will be the reality is Latrell himself doesn’t even know!
Option a) 400k 1 year deal with South Sydney
Option b) 3.8 mil 4 year deal with Wests Tigers
Over the next week, Latrell will ultimately decide his destination and it’s fair to say the Rugby League world is awaiting!
@wokesmoke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098744) said:@tony-soprano said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098743) said:@wokesmoke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098713) said:Hi guys, woke here. Just wanted to say I have a good feeling about latrell making a decision this week. I think his future will be decided officially by late next week. If you’re a fan of his I think you will be happy
Are you related to smoking gun or smoking gun 2?
Good afternoon tony, I’m unsure of who that is so my answer would have to be no. I hope you have had a nice day today sir
@wokesmoke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098724) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098722) said:@wokesmoke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098721) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098714) said:From the Souths Forum
The Tigers CEO Justin Pascoe is re-entering the race for his signature and has dropped off signing AJ so not to assist Souths in clearing more cap space to sign Mitchell.
That is interesting news I must say.
Sure is nug, I mean woke.
I don’t know what that is supposed to mean sir, but what ever nug is, I am not. I hope you’re having a nice Wednesday sir.
@Carefactor said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098751) said:@WT2K said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098740) said:@Carefactor said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098732) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098714) said:From the Souths Forum
The Tigers CEO Justin Pascoe is re-entering the race for his signature and has dropped off signing AJ so not to assist Souths in clearing more cap space to sign Mitchell.
Hmmmm perhaps he is still listening to the fan base ?
Which poster on here is Pascoe ?
The club doesn't nessasarily write , but they certainly read .
@Geo said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098781) said:I'd forgotten about that man..
Is he the same bloke who ate his shoe..
@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098801) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Latrell plays for us last year we make the 8. No question
@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098803) said:@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098801) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Latrell plays for us last year we make the 8. No question
limping into the 8 isnt enough.
Latrell plays well, what, 3 games a year in clubland... need to be lucky he plays well in the games we need him to. More chance of him looking good in a blow out, than turning a skinny loss.
@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098802) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Respect your opinion, what do you think is the final cog? I think it's a 9 a 1 and an outside back
@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098801) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Latrell plays for us last year we make the 8. No question
@jirskyr said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098785) said:@wokesmoke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098744) said:@tony-soprano said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098743) said:@wokesmoke said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098713) said:Hi guys, woke here. Just wanted to say I have a good feeling about latrell making a decision this week. I think his future will be decided officially by late next week. If you’re a fan of his I think you will be happy
Are you related to smoking gun or smoking gun 2?
Good afternoon tony, I’m unsure of who that is so my answer would have to be no. I hope you have had a nice day today sir
You sound like the lovechild of @smoking_gun and @MAGPIES1963?
Have a lovely day.
edit: just read covitny said the same thing.
@twentyforty said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098814) said:@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098801) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Latrell plays for us last year we make the 8. No question
I think there were 3 or 4 games he could have turned our way if he wanted to. He is the second fastest player in the NRL, so he would attract a lot of interest from opposition defence.
@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098812) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098802) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Respect your opinion, what do you think is the final cog? I think it's a 9 a 1 and an outside back
sounds silly but a real damaging second rower is a piece we need more than a back. Matterson hurt us. Frizell, Cordner, Taumalolo et. al. add both extra starch to the pack, yet also unlock the backs when running numbers. I think Brooks can read the numbers, just we lack the venom to sell the cut outs so we dont profit from indecisiveness. Matterson out wide was more dangerous than when he was in the middle.
Mitchell benefitted from having Keary inside him and then Cordner. Defensive lines dont slide hard when Cordner is an option, though any defender in the league would hedge their bets on stopping Lawrence one on
one for example. Mitchell would become our new Teddy pass when nothing is going on. If Mitchell was a fullback with all his skills, of which he has a fair toolkit, he wouldnt have lost the job long before Tedesco rocked up.
@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098808) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098803) said:@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098801) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Latrell plays for us last year we make the 8. No question
limping into the 8 isnt enough.
Latrell plays well, what, 3 games a year in clubland... need to be lucky he plays well in the games we need him to. More chance of him looking good in a blow out, than turning a skinny loss.
Missing the 8 isnt enough either.
If he was here last year we make the 8 and look a lot more enticing destination to other players for this year. I also disagree that he plays well in only 3 games a year.
@beachtiger said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098818) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098812) said:@tiga4eva said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098802) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Respect your opinion, what do you think is the final cog? I think it's a 9 a 1 and an outside back
sounds silly but a real damaging second rower is a piece we need more than a back. Matterson hurt us. Frizell, Cordner, Taumalolo et. al. add both extra starch to the pack, yet also unlock the backs when running numbers. I think Brooks can read the numbers, just we lack the venom to sell the cut outs so we dont profit from indecisiveness. Matterson out wide was more dangerous than when he was in the middle.
Mitchell benefitted from having Keary inside him and then Cordner. Defensive lines dont slide hard when Cordner is an option, though any defender in the league would hedge their bets on stopping Lawrence one on
one for example. Mitchell would become our new Teddy pass when nothing is going on. If Mitchell was a fullback with all his skills, of which he has a fair toolkit, he wouldnt have lost the job long before Tedesco rocked up.
I think you’ll find Big Luci will fill that role nicely, big body with some ball playing ability!!
@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098819) said:@gallagher said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098808) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098803) said:@Glenn5150 said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098801) said:@Blacknwhite said in [Latrell Mitchell Contract Discussion](/post/1098799) said:I pray he doesnt come.... or if he does we screw him down on price.
900k is for players who can turn a game regularly, this bloke doesnt even turn up to captains runs consistantly. Gun players dont come here because they dont think they are the final cog in the machine to make us contenders. Mitchell isnt the final cog to make us a success.
Latrell plays for us last year we make the 8. No question
limping into the 8 isnt enough.
Latrell plays well, what, 3 games a year in clubland... need to be lucky he plays well in the games we need him to. More chance of him looking good in a blow out, than turning a skinny loss.
Missing the 8 isnt enough either.
If he was here last year we make the 8 and look a lot more enticing destination to other players for this year. I also disagree that he plays well in only 3 games a year.
watch this.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pbdJMht3rs
take out Tigers, we made him look good, then take out the bottom teams... then when you watch the rest he is unlocked by Tedesco or defenders making bad decision on his inside men the vast majority of the time. who unlocks him with the big decoy run... who is our Keary popping him short...
watch closely. You will realise we dont have the players to unleash him. We will feed him into road blocks. Did it to Tedesco as well.