Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It goes back to the old question though - do Tigers have a Luke Brooks problem, or does Luke Brooks have a Tigers problem?Yeh this is what gets me
People acting like Sheens is infallible too... some of the teams he used to pick were ridiculous. Danny Galea and Bronson Harrison as our props? Fitzhenry ... Shannon McDonnell ... Matt Groat. Ruined Moltzen's career by turning a great young Aus schoolboy half into a failed fullback.
Sheens has a load of footy knowledge, but he's not perfect and is wrong as often as he is right.
In any case, Brooks has been a proven failure for 9 years. He's not going to magically come good in his 10th at 28-29 years old.
It goes back to the old question though - do Tigers have a Luke Brooks problem, or does Luke Brooks have a Tigers problem?
If he played for Storm you think Brooks would definitely have played finals.
Not if he was in the halves.It goes back to the old question though - do Tigers have a Luke Brooks problem, or does Luke Brooks have a Tigers problem?
If he played for Storm you think Brooks would definitely have played finals.
Great Post. Spot on.People acting like Sheens is infallible too... some of the teams he used to pick were ridiculous. Danny Galea and Bronson Harrison as our props? Fitzhenry ... Shannon McDonnell ... Matt Groat. Ruined Moltzen's career by turning a great young Aus schoolboy half into a failed fullback.
Sheens has a load of footy knowledge, but he's not perfect and is wrong as often as he is right.
In any case, Brooks has been a proven failure for 9 years. He's not going to magically come good in his 10th at 28-29 years old.
don't think Tim Moltzen played Australian Schoolboys ....People acting like Sheens is infallible too... some of the teams he used to pick were ridiculous. Danny Galea and Bronson Harrison as our props? Fitzhenry ... Shannon McDonnell ... Matt Groat. Ruined Moltzen's career by turning a great young Aus schoolboy half into a failed fullback.
Sheens has a load of footy knowledge, but he's not perfect and is wrong as often as he is right.
In any case, Brooks has been a proven failure for 9 years. He's not going to magically come good in his 10th at 28-29 years old.
How could it possibly be anyone's fault other than Brooks? Once again, you deflect blame from the player to any other possible thing. I said you have contributed to the myth of Brooks, not to how he plays.Ah yes, it’s the fans fault theory. Thats just laziness.
I am Anti brooks, but I live in reality. Why in hell would Munster and Moses ever come to the Tigers?Clearly you haven’t been following this thread today, cos that is not what I want. I want to go out and try and sign Munster, or even Moses. Those who are anti-Brooks want Hastings/AD. Please.
Is being quick and being able to tackle, having all of the attributes? He can't kick, he doesn't have a cutout ball in his game... he throws short balls like cannon balls... he is terrible in many of the areas that a half should be good in. Once again, a strange, deceptive description of Brooks that doesn't match reality.Definitely a brains thing. Is quick, can tackle has all the attributes apart from his decision making
Being able to tackle would have won us the game yesterday.Is being quick and being able to tackle, having all of the attributes? He can't kick, he doesn't have a cutout ball in his game... he throws short balls like cannon balls... he is terrible in many of the areas that a half should be good in. Once again, a strange, deceptive description of Brooks that doesn't match reality.
I am Anti brooks, but I live in reality. Why in hell would Munster and Moses ever come to the Tigers?
Popcorn at the readySituation with Brooks will develop over the next 2-3 weeks on whether Brooks will push for a release or not. Brent Read via triple m.