@jirskyr said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1334266) said:I knew this thread would fire after today's game, especially after walking out onto Mary St and the first comment I hear from a supporter is "Brooks has to go".
Funny we scored 30 points, Brooks made 1 error at the death and missed no tackles. What else is the half supposed to do in a game like today?
Yeah he got outplayed by Drinkwater, because Tigers refused to tackle or have any linespeed - Chad Townsend would have looked great today with the way Tigers defended.
Does anyone reckon Adam Clune won the match for the Dragons today? No, he did his job and he's an average athlete, but his team defended like beasts and kept the intensity going all match. Let's sign Adam Clune then, see what he can do with no go-forward and no linespeed in defence.
I think Brooks was very conservative in the early sets, but we got the try we needed, and he wouldn't have expected to have to chase down 22 points by half-time, to have to increase the tempo so badly.
The half isn't the problem right now, he's top of league in try assists, equal-3rd in line-break assists and we have scored 22 or better 3 weeks in a row.
Good post. But i would like Brooks to go to a better club, this club does not deserve him. The backline except for Laurie , all have to go, and Simkin would give some variety in attack. I don't know what the coaching staff are doing,
but it's not much, they look like a side with no game plan.
Agression and speed is lacking everywhere.