Luke Brooks

Status
Not open for further replies.
They must be feeling the heat to issue a statement at 8pm on a Sunday night.
Reading sheens words it's like 2008 all over again
Not a good start
 
@tigerlouis said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497468) said:
You put Brooks in one of the top teams like Storm or Roosters & you will see the difference he is not the problem.

Brooks is on par with Brodie Croft… he would have been punted.
 
@innsaneink said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497488) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497447) said:
@innsaneink said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497423) said:
@lauren said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497411) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497409) said:
@lauren said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497405) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497401) said:
@lauren said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497392) said:
Sheens statement articulates that the club are unified in its decision making and possibly averts any crisis.
We of all people should know how the media - including social media - can be significantly damaging and pose further threat or harm to our brand/operations(including recruitment), so it's good for PR management.

I appreciated the reference to Luke's team mates and family. It's especially gotta be hell for them and his words are also rather respectful to them IMO.

How much more harm could our brand experience?
We are already a laughing stock within the game and our recruitment department is disrespected/taken advantage of by all other clubs.
The only thing missing is an extremely well deserved spoon.
Next year…

Maybe if you didn't focus on the thoughts of others it wouldn't be bothersome for you. There's also something wrong with the fact you've taken a swipe at my post because you can't control it.
I'd for once like to support my team without having to deal with negative and passive aggressive people.

…and I would like to see my club succeed.
Sticking by a halfback who has failed for 8 years consecutively is not going to achieve this.

Are you comfortable trying to bully a woman?
Why engage with someone who you clearly disagree with, for the simple sake of an argument?

hhahaha what a pissweak reply...
The sexist card eh?
pathetic

It was perhaps an error of judgement to play that card.

It doesn’t take a man to point it out…

Doesn't matter if I'm male female or those other new ones these days
If it were the race card, the gay card... Any card, I'm calling out that post for what it is.
Falsely accusing someone of bullying is pathetic
Online bullying is very serious and has led to suicide from genuine victims... Its Nothing to make light of

Lauren's posts are always well considered and insightful. I hope Lauren continues to post her contributions.
 
I'm stuffed if I can figure Brooks out. Does he want to lead or doesn't he? I just feel he is waiting for something to happen at the club, but at the same time passively resistant to anyone trying to take the lead - players/coach. If he doesn't back the coach the club and he just have to call it quits once and for all.
 
@telltails said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497492) said:
I'm stuffed if I can figure Brooks out. Does he want to lead or doesn't he? I just feel he is waiting for something to happen at the club, but at the same time passively resistant to anyone trying to take the lead - players/coach. If he doesn't back the coach the club and he just have to call it quits once and for all.

He wants to lead but can’t, it’s not in his personality.
 
@innsaneink said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497489) said:
They must be feeling the heat to issue a statement at 8pm on a Sunday night.
Reading sheens words it's like 2008 all over again
Not a good start

Man this forum is full of grown men whinging. Let the season pan.

Just because you don't like that Sheens has backed Brooks have to dig up stuff from 2008.

Seriously get a grip.
 
@furious1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497352) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497305) said:
Club issued a statement from Sheens

Wests Tigers statement on Luke Brooks

Wests Tigers Director of Football Tim Sheens has issued the following statement regarding halfback Luke Brooks.

“Luke Brooks is contracted with Wests Tigers until at least the end of 2023 and, contrary to media speculation, will not be leaving the club.

“Luke is a proud local junior and an extremely talented halfback, who has shown an unquestionable level of commitment to Wests Tigers over a number of years. It is clear that he remains an integral part of the long-term plans of Wests Tigers and, in speaking with him, he too is equally focused and passionate on delivering sustained success for the club.

“Wests Tigers have been definitive on this matter and will continue to reiterate this against any untrue speculation. It is unfair on Luke, his teammates and family, as well as those involved with the club, to raise false conjecture on his future lying away from Wests Tigers when both he and the club are united on delivering success together.

“I have known Luke for a long time and am continually impressed by the way that he carries himself both on and off the field. I look forward to working with him again to give the proud Members of this club the performances and results they deserve.”

Outstanding. Not because one agrees or disagrees with the sentiment, but because the statement has been made with firm conviction. Finally a statement from somebody at the club who doesn't sound like they are way out of their depth. Maybe we have finally filled that leadership hole.


Exactly what the club has been short on. We have some good people who are happy to lift when the wind is at their back but we’ve lacked those who lift their game run into the wind. The true leaders. Thanks for underscoring that!
 
I know some mods don't like Brooks but I think if this forum is going to be serious about enforcing rules without looking like a dictatorship they should close any Luke Brooks threads.

This forum is incapable of not demonstrating emotional responses that don't come across as highschool bulling when it comes to Brooks.

Like sheens said false rumours and the talk around it effect Brooks family but forum contributors and mods time after time show they don't care about this when it comes to pushing their agenda.

Enforcing community standards, please don't treat us like idiots, this place has always been about enforcing personal agenda
 
I don’t believe Brooks is the answer moving forward but if we were to pack him off now who takes his spot?

Hastings - returning after a break from NRL level
Madden - a rookie who is still developing
Who else?
 
I rate Brooksy in our top 3 players. Skill wise probably our best?
He’s at least a top 8 half.
It would be crazy to move him on when there are more urgent shortcomings to fix.
 
@twentyforty said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497505) said:
I rate Brooksy in our top 3 players. Skill wise probably our best?
He’s at least a top 8 half.
It would be crazy to move him on when there are more urgent shortcomings to fix.

Agreed it is obvious to all especially the other clubs we are a soft team that can’t defend. I would hate to be playing NRL with our pack. Last year they were KOE level and that’s obvious at least to that matter.
 
@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497464) said:
@tigerlouis said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497459) said:
Brooks won a dally m halfback of the year not long ago with one of the weakest forward packs in front of him the guy can play if he has better organising players around him such as Hastings & Hodgson.

Every time Brooks has played with organising players he has whinged publicly about "Not having the keys". He's a myth

"Whinged publicly".....any actual evidence of this?
 
@donk said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497469) said:
@tigerlouis said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497468) said:
You put Brooks in one of the top teams like Storm or Roosters & you will see the difference he is not the problem.

I’ve read and heard this throw away line many times.
It can’t be qualified but that never stops the author trying to claim the higher ground by stating it can’t be proven wrong.
It’s laughable nonsense.

Or it could be their opinion. Not every post here is calculated for internet forum "dominance".
 
@donk said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497469) said:
@tigerlouis said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497468) said:
You put Brooks in one of the top teams like Storm or Roosters & you will see the difference he is not the problem.

I’ve read and heard this throw away line many times.
It can’t be qualified but that never stops the author trying to claim the higher ground by stating it can’t be proven wrong.
It’s laughable nonsense.

If it can’t be qualified as you say, how can you know it’s nonsense?
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497491) said:
@innsaneink said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497488) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497447) said:
@innsaneink said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497423) said:
@lauren said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497411) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497409) said:
@lauren said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497405) said:
@donk said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497401) said:
@lauren said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497392) said:
Sheens statement articulates that the club are unified in its decision making and possibly averts any crisis.
We of all people should know how the media - including social media - can be significantly damaging and pose further threat or harm to our brand/operations(including recruitment), so it's good for PR management.

I appreciated the reference to Luke's team mates and family. It's especially gotta be hell for them and his words are also rather respectful to them IMO.

How much more harm could our brand experience?
We are already a laughing stock within the game and our recruitment department is disrespected/taken advantage of by all other clubs.
The only thing missing is an extremely well deserved spoon.
Next year…

Maybe if you didn't focus on the thoughts of others it wouldn't be bothersome for you. There's also something wrong with the fact you've taken a swipe at my post because you can't control it.
I'd for once like to support my team without having to deal with negative and passive aggressive people.

…and I would like to see my club succeed.
Sticking by a halfback who has failed for 8 years consecutively is not going to achieve this.

Are you comfortable trying to bully a woman?
Why engage with someone who you clearly disagree with, for the simple sake of an argument?

hhahaha what a pissweak reply...
The sexist card eh?
pathetic

It was perhaps an error of judgement to play that card.

It doesn’t take a man to point it out…

Doesn't matter if I'm male female or those other new ones these days
If it were the race card, the gay card... Any card, I'm calling out that post for what it is.
Falsely accusing someone of bullying is pathetic
Online bullying is very serious and has led to suicide from genuine victims... Its Nothing to make light of

Lauren's posts are always well considered and insightful. I hope Lauren continues to post her contributions.

+1
 
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497510) said:
@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497464) said:
@tigerlouis said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497459) said:
Brooks won a dally m halfback of the year not long ago with one of the weakest forward packs in front of him the guy can play if he has better organising players around him such as Hastings & Hodgson.

Every time Brooks has played with organising players he has whinged publicly about "Not having the keys". He's a myth

"Whinged publicly".....any actual evidence of this?

I also doubt that he's said anything...
It's moreso been reported in the media that "It's his team now" and "Given Brooks the reigns" etc...
I remember him being quizzed on it in interviews and agreeing that it was his job.
But he's never come out and complained about anything - Much less about the control of the team.
The negators in one breathe will complain he doesn't talk - Or doesn't say anything... Then say he complains about his role in the team.
It can't be both.
 
@camel2281 said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497450) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497321) said:
@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497318) said:
@gnr4life said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497315) said:
@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497313) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497311) said:
@tilllindemann said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497307) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497297) said:
@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497290) said:
@cochise said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497288) said:
@clontarfkid said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497268) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497250) said:
@happy_tiger said in [Luke Brooks](/post/1497248) said:
Bricks unlikely to re be released to Knights

https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/other/tigers-unlikely-to-let-brooks-join-knights/ar-AAPSN0b?ocid=ientp

Not sure why. We’re bottom 4 with or without him, better to take that money and sign a player actually worth what he’s on.

We cld find a solution that wld perform equally well for a fraction of the price

A solution that combined with what we are paying him to leave would come in less than what he costs us to keep him?

He says that HE is not happy..so why shld we pay a significant premium for him to leave?

Where di he say that?

It's been said on his behalf in the media. Nothing stopping him jumping on social media to say it's rubbish. His silence is endorsement. You might expect undermining a coach by BJ Leilua, but it cannot be tolerated by our halfback.

What I have heard is there are members of Luke's family that would like him to move on but Luke himself wants to stay.

If he wants to stay he needs to publicly back the coach. I've never been in the 'hate Brooks' club, but man am I sick of players undermining the coach/club.

What’s backing the coach publicly going to accomplish. There was a time Farah backed JT, which was clearly rubbish. Anything that is said publicly carries little weight.

We just went through very public turmoil over who our coach will be, and we decided to stick with Madge. It is just not good enough to then have it in print that Brooks doesn't want to play under Madge, and for Brooks not to deny that. Even if it's just for appearance!

I don’t think he’s under any more obligation to publicly back Maguire than any other player.

It is when his manager is feeding journalists the information in question

*sigh* more rumours
 
I'm not a Luke Brooks fan at all, but good on Sheens for coming out and putting the story to bed.

As much as I'd like to see Brooks move on, until we have someone better to pull on the number 7 we should stick with him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top