Madge Maguire - Mega Thread

What doesn’t make sense is that it seems Lee H is a Madge man, he said recently he wasn’t going anywhere…right? Isn’t Lee also a Nofa fan? Got him the long deal etc. So, what’s the politics at play here? Nofa is not supporting the coach now? I’m struggling to work out how decisions are made…sometimes it feels Lee is steering the ship, at other times it feels the opposite.
 
@the_third said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411972) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411955) said:
@weststigsrdabest said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411952) said:
I love Madge and will be disappointed if we part ways...really wanted him to bring us out of the hole but maybe we are just to too weak atm for his style...I reallly think we need to go for a coach with a great reputation and who players love...my two ideal options would be Wayne or filter...both would help us with attracting the right players

NOOOOOO to both


ciraldo or Flanagan?

Fittler and Bennett
 
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411936) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411908) said:
![F73CEFF5-DC77-49C3-A18B-D4D0BA176B13.jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1625914162163-f73ceff5-dc77-49c3-a18b-d4d0ba176b13.jpeg)

That is our very own @boonboon calling him out lol

Some home truth comments from Chammas.

Interesting take have a read through the thread if you have Twitter

https://twitter.com/michaelchammas/status/1413807067329011722?s=21
 
@mike said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411734) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411363) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411362) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411360) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411354) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411351) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411332) said:
@2005magic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411324) said:
I have heard on numerous occassions in pre match comments by Maguire that the team has trained well and practiced what they have to do and then they come out on to the field and play like headless chooks with no pattern / system to defence and little to no planning.

So, doesnt the truth then have to be that on the field of battle they are falling apart under pressure? Could it be that the leadership group isnt leading by example, the captain is not inspiring them (or not on the field), and the halfback is not organising, or most worryingly, the team is dogging it. While it is true there are many young-uns in the 17, there are also enough experienced old-uns to be able to take the pressure and help the others. Yet, they are not.

If they are doing totally opposite to what has been practised on training the culprit players are in the wrong and should be sacked. Surely contracts have in them undertaking coaches instructions. If the players think they n=know better tit cant go on.

Im all for replacing Maguire if we can find someone better, but the players behind all this should not, cannot, escape the axe. If they do get a new coach, they would have to accept the direction the club is going in and not go through another massive rebuild.

Questions are being asked of the coach about why he is reporting to the club that training is going well but that is not transferring to gameday.

That’s an interesting one. It feels like we have a pretty disconnected group which I’d imagine would also be fairly obvious through the week. Do people from the senior admin not go to training and watch? What are they doing? Certainly not winning in their meetings with player managers.

Going and watching training and understanding what is happening, whether the goals of the session are being achieved, if players are hitting data etc are different things. I don't expect Pascoe to be able to go to training and determine of the training session was successful. I would also be disappointed if he is spending all day at training.

With the right experience it’s easy to tell the difference between a really connected team and one that’s got issues. I think everything would just be humming if you watched Melbourne train. I imagine some of our fellas would stroll in and probably not even acknowledge each other. That’s how they’re playing anyway.

Yes but that is not the senior management role to see that, it is Madges role. That is why he is being asked those questions.

This is where we disagree mate, from top down I’d want football nous. They’re on big money and what exactly are they doing to win us games?

Edit: This is why I like the Sheens appointment.

Maybe you do but I don’t. This is not a sole trader or small business organisation where 1 person does everything. You have specialists for each area of the organisation. Not everyone has or should have football nous, that would not be a well functioning organisation.

Then don’t send Mr Pascoe to meet the superstars and don’t put his quotes on the press release when we sign duds, he can’t have his cake and eat it too. Is he an administrator or a footy guy?
 
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1412012) said:
@mike said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411734) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411363) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411362) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411360) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411354) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411351) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411332) said:
@2005magic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411324) said:
I have heard on numerous occassions in pre match comments by Maguire that the team has trained well and practiced what they have to do and then they come out on to the field and play like headless chooks with no pattern / system to defence and little to no planning.

So, doesnt the truth then have to be that on the field of battle they are falling apart under pressure? Could it be that the leadership group isnt leading by example, the captain is not inspiring them (or not on the field), and the halfback is not organising, or most worryingly, the team is dogging it. While it is true there are many young-uns in the 17, there are also enough experienced old-uns to be able to take the pressure and help the others. Yet, they are not.

If they are doing totally opposite to what has been practised on training the culprit players are in the wrong and should be sacked. Surely contracts have in them undertaking coaches instructions. If the players think they n=know better tit cant go on.

Im all for replacing Maguire if we can find someone better, but the players behind all this should not, cannot, escape the axe. If they do get a new coach, they would have to accept the direction the club is going in and not go through another massive rebuild.

Questions are being asked of the coach about why he is reporting to the club that training is going well but that is not transferring to gameday.

That’s an interesting one. It feels like we have a pretty disconnected group which I’d imagine would also be fairly obvious through the week. Do people from the senior admin not go to training and watch? What are they doing? Certainly not winning in their meetings with player managers.

Going and watching training and understanding what is happening, whether the goals of the session are being achieved, if players are hitting data etc are different things. I don't expect Pascoe to be able to go to training and determine of the training session was successful. I would also be disappointed if he is spending all day at training.

With the right experience it’s easy to tell the difference between a really connected team and one that’s got issues. I think everything would just be humming if you watched Melbourne train. I imagine some of our fellas would stroll in and probably not even acknowledge each other. That’s how they’re playing anyway.

Yes but that is not the senior management role to see that, it is Madges role. That is why he is being asked those questions.

This is where we disagree mate, from top down I’d want football nous. They’re on big money and what exactly are they doing to win us games?

Edit: This is why I like the Sheens appointment.

Maybe you do but I don’t. This is not a sole trader or small business organisation where 1 person does everything. You have specialists for each area of the organisation. Not everyone has or should have football nous, that would not be a well functioning organisation.

Then don’t send Mr Pascoe to meet the superstars and don’t put his quotes on the press release when we sign duds, he can’t have his cake and eat it too. Is he an administrator or a footy guy?

He’s the lead muppet
 
@helmesy said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411986) said:
What doesn’t make sense is that it seems Lee H is a Madge man, he said recently he wasn’t going anywhere…right? Isn’t Lee also a Nofa fan? Got him the long deal etc. So, what’s the politics at play here? Nofa is not supporting the coach now? I’m struggling to work out how decisions are made…sometimes it feels Lee is steering the ship, at other times it feels the opposite.


Lee must have given Nofa a year or two extra on his recent contract which would only be due to Nofa's special friendship with Lee's
daughter, what's a extra year or two between mates? right? Thanks mate. But Lee certainly is a strong supporter of Madge, I say, wake-up Nofa and stop acting like a spoiled brat with your special new contract, if it were not for this special friendship, Lee would
not be left in a very difficult position.
 
@tony-soprano said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411991) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411936) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411908) said:
![F73CEFF5-DC77-49C3-A18B-D4D0BA176B13.jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1625914162163-f73ceff5-dc77-49c3-a18b-d4d0ba176b13.jpeg)

That is our very own @boonboon calling him out lol

Some home truth comments from Chammas.

Interesting take have a read through the thread if you have Twitter

https://twitter.com/michaelchammas/status/1413807067329011722?s=21

What experience does Michael Chammas have in coaching a FG NRL side that would make anyone take notice. His job is to attract attention in the only way he knows how -through controversy. If the club sacks Maguire he will come after the club and their years of failure and inability to stick to coaches and support them to get the job done etc etc There is a reason Wayne Bennett answers them with one word answers and disdain - they are parasites. They feed off the game and give nothing in return.
 
@telltails said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1412022) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411991) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411936) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411908) said:
![F73CEFF5-DC77-49C3-A18B-D4D0BA176B13.jpeg](/assets/uploads/files/1625914162163-f73ceff5-dc77-49c3-a18b-d4d0ba176b13.jpeg)

That is our very own @boonboon calling him out lol

Some home truth comments from Chammas.

Interesting take have a read through the thread if you have Twitter

https://twitter.com/michaelchammas/status/1413807067329011722?s=21

What experience does Michael Chammas have in coaching a FG NRL side that would make anyone take notice. His job is to attract attention in the only way he knows how -through controversy. If the club sacks Maguire he will come after the club and their years of failure and inability to stick to coaches and support them to get the job done etc etc There is a reason Wayne Bennett answers them with one word answers and disdain - they are parasites. They feed off the game and give nothing in return.


The degree of contempt Bennett has for the media is about the only thing i agree with him on
 
@kul said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411692) said:
The thing is, Madge looks to be the only one who's fired up and want's to win.

G'day @Kul

Great :+1: to see your name on a post whenever they pop up.
And thanks for still looking after Our Forum as well as You do :hugging_face: .
There would be a lot of lost Wests Tigers supporters if we didn't have this Forum to turn to.
Stay safe in this Covid world :hand_with_index_and_middle_fingers_crossed:
 
@tiger5150 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411702) said:
@avocadoontoast said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411572) said:
‘Whispers are getting louder’: Madge given timeline to save job as dressing room turns

From Fox


Pressure is mounting on Wests Tigers coach Michael Maguire amid claims members of the playing group were taken aback by his press conference comments last week.

Maguire described his team’s performance against the Rabbitohs as “garbage” after the 38-22 loss, adding that he “needs to find men who are going to be accountable”.

Those comments did not go down well with some players though.

“I think we are all starting to hear the rumblings around the Tigers and a little bit of unrest at the club in regards to the way they go forward,” the Sydney Morning Herald’s Michael Chammas toldTriple M on Saturday.

“Quite a few of the players had their noses out of joint a little offended by Michael Maguire’s comments last week.”

The Tigers currently sit in 14th position with just five wins from 16 games and are yet to qualify for the finals under Maguire, who took the Rabbitohs to a premiership in 2014.

Maguire’s role in the club’s poor form has been excused at times with suggestions his hard edge is needed to address the soft underbelly at the Tigers.

But now he and the club face a stark reality.

“I’m not defending the players because I think there’s an element that the players are partly to blame,” Chammas said.

“It’s the reality of the situation that if he’s starting to lose them and comments like that, sending text messages amongst each other about ‘what’s the coach saying here about us’ and they’re taking offence to it.

“Whether they are right or wrong that is the reality of the situation Madge now finds himself in. How you overturn that, given their start to the year, given they are struggling to recruit players. I’m starting to feel he is losing a lot of support with the people that matter.”

It comes as the Daily Telegraph believes Maguire has six games to save his job and a defeat to the Broncos in their next match could prove fatal.

“They play Brisbane on the back of a bye, have lost to Melbourne and South Sydney which most people expected, but if they lose to Brisbane things could start to unravel pretty quickly,” Chammas added.

“The club is waiting for Tim Sheens to arrive, he probably won’t be out of quarantine until August but the whispers are getting louder.”

Sheens will be returning to the Tigers as head of football performance but The Australian’s Brent Read worries it may be too late to save Maguire’s job.

“The sense I get is they’ll wait until Tim gets here and gets his feet under the desk and a feel for the environment,” he said.

“I’ve been one of Madge’s biggest fans and I cop flak for it but even I acknowledge now the sense is unless things change dramatically in the next month or two, he can’t survive. They’re just making no headway, they’re actually going backwards.


“The players have to take a lot of responsibility for it but as we always see in these situations, it is easier to get rid of a coach than to clean out the dressing room. So ultimately if Tim Sheens gets there and they lose a couple more. If they lose that game [Broncos], that is another mark against him.

“If Tim gets there in August and things haven’t changed, I don’t see how Madge can be there next year.”

However, one of the other questions the club needs to ask itself is that if Maguire is not the coach to lead the Tigers forward, then who is?

Shane Flanagan, Paul Green and Paul McGregor are three high-profile former coaches looking for a full-time gig but Chammas is hearing another name.

“When I speak to people in the NRL about who the best coach the one name I keep hearing is Cameron Ciraldo,” he said.

Ciraldo was pursued by Cronulla to work as assistant coach alongside Craig Fitzgibbon but declined the offer, instead opting to stay put at Penrith.

Panthers great Mark Geyer though believes a head coaching gig would be enough to see Ciraldo leave the foot of the mountains.

“The hype is real,” he said.

“I think he’d leave for a first-grade job. I know that Fitzy wanted to headhunt him at the Sharks as an assistant but ultimately he stayed at Penrith and that got approved with a roar of cheers. The players love him.

“He’s the Fitzgibbon of Origin. Fitzy does all the talking to the players, Freddie will go on the record and say that. Freddie has that aura where he doesn’t need to say much and when he says it they jump. He’s got the whole squad juggling – one bloke who has gone to the next level juggling is Nathan Cleary – hand-eye coordination.”

When you combine Ciraldo’s open mindset with his strong communication skills, Geyer said the 36-year-old would thrive in head coaching role.

“He thinks outside the box, has a great demeanour,” he added.

“He’s a softly spoken bloke but when he talks you listen. He says it in a way that you want to run through walls for him and that’s what I’m trying to get back to.

“Respecting whose authority is above you. If you’ve got respect for them you’ll do anything, you won’t turn up to training drunk.”

Geyer is referring to reports David Nofoaluma was stood down from the Tigers leadership group after attending training hungover.

It was the morning after the wedding of chairman Lee Hagipantelis’ daughter.

He believes that incident speaks to the broader problems at not just the Tigers but other clubs struggling for form at the moment.

“Look at the Dragons with what happened to them last Saturday, the Bulldogs with what happened the week before, David Nofoaluma coming to training hungover - it doesn’t happen to Penrith, the Roosters and the Storm – the good clubs,” he said.

“It starts right at the top and filters its way down to the players. If you have respect for those who are above you, who are in command, you don’t stuff up. If you give a damn about who has the whistle in the hand you’re going to act accordingly.

“Is Madge the right man for the job? I think he is. Has he got a roster he doesn’t want at the moment? Half of it – yeah – they’re rugby league players who do this for a living.

“Some of the performances they’ve put up this year, they should be unemployed some of them, that’s just not up to first-grade standards. Something is wrong.

“Hopefully Tim Sheens who has an aura about him, if he can come straighten the Tigers out which I think he can, if you start winning it becomes infectious. That’s all the Tigers need a couple of back-to-back and they need to get one soon.”

If that does not come next week against Brisbane it will spell trouble for Maguire.


OK, thats great, Chamas has laid his agenda out for all to see.

And it was mentioned on an earlier post Madge had questioned the appt of Sheens.
I've got a feeling that statement is wrong, as its said Madge and Sheens have a lot of respect for each other.
 
@hsvjones said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411803) said:
All this talk about Madge been fired has the players licking there lips again... A lot of these players don't give a shit and happy to collect their massive pay cheques but as soon as the coach calls them out in public they cry. Not come out and show that they are 1st grade players with pride in the jersey and happy playing NRL... Madge is correct wether or not he remains coach but the fact is these guys are not MEN..
I'm not saying Madge is not 100% the reason but we continually go through coaches and the same results.. We are a weak minded team and need to harden up. Its a culture in the club and hoping games go our way and not wanting to put the hard yards in and be accountable.
If Belly, Bennett or Robinson said in a Press Conf what Madge said the media would be congratulating him on been discipline and not excepting below par standards.. I personally hope Sheen comes in to sees this and backs the coach and we get rid of the remaining deadwood. I know people don't like Madge but him Hartigan are doing a great job building this club from the ground up..

Good post HSVJ.
 
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411988) said:
@the_third said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411972) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411955) said:
@weststigsrdabest said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411952) said:
I love Madge and will be disappointed if we part ways...really wanted him to bring us out of the hole but maybe we are just to too weak atm for his style...I reallly think we need to go for a coach with a great reputation and who players love...my two ideal options would be Wayne or filter...both would help us with attracting the right players

NOOOOOO to both


ciraldo or Flanagan?

Fittler and Bennett

Tbh I can’t really see any other coach changing this team besides tho two, due to their ability to get stars in the squad. Truth is we are a weak team...Madge is a good coach with an underperforming roster...imo no coach can get this team into the the top...so either stick with Madge and co and try and rebuild culture from the bottom down or get a high profile coach like Freddy or Wayne to attract top tier talent
 
@weststigsrdabest said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1412061) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411988) said:
@the_third said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411972) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411955) said:
@weststigsrdabest said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411952) said:
I love Madge and will be disappointed if we part ways...really wanted him to bring us out of the hole but maybe we are just to too weak atm for his style...I reallly think we need to go for a coach with a great reputation and who players love...my two ideal options would be Wayne or filter...both would help us with attracting the right players

NOOOOOO to both


ciraldo or Flanagan?

Fittler and Bennett

Tbh I can’t really see any other coach changing this team besides tho two, due to their ability to get stars in the squad. Truth is we are a weak team...Madge is a good coach with an underperforming roster...imo no coach can get this team into the the top...so either stick with Madge and co and try and rebuild culture from the bottom down or get a high profile coach like Freddy or Wayne to attract top tier talent

Fittler is a dunce who does well at origin level due to the quality of players and it being more about motivation.

Wayne is not a rebuild coach and doesn't care about how he leaves a side when he finishes up. In fact I believe he likes them to crash and burn after he leaves.

They are the worst type of coaches for this club.
 
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1412064) said:
@weststigsrdabest said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1412061) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411988) said:
@the_third said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411972) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411955) said:
@weststigsrdabest said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411952) said:
I love Madge and will be disappointed if we part ways...really wanted him to bring us out of the hole but maybe we are just to too weak atm for his style...I reallly think we need to go for a coach with a great reputation and who players love...my two ideal options would be Wayne or filter...both would help us with attracting the right players

NOOOOOO to both


ciraldo or Flanagan?

Fittler and Bennett

Tbh I can’t really see any other coach changing this team besides tho two, due to their ability to get stars in the squad. Truth is we are a weak team...Madge is a good coach with an underperforming roster...imo no coach can get this team into the the top...so either stick with Madge and co and try and rebuild culture from the bottom down or get a high profile coach like Freddy or Wayne to attract top tier talent

Fittler is a dunce who does well at origin level due to the quality of players and it being more about motivation.

Wayne is not a rebuild coach and doesn't care about how he leaves a side when he finishes up. In fact I believe he likes them to crash and burn after he leaves.

They are the worst type of coaches for this club.

I agree but I really think we need to persist with Madge in that case...I don’t think some inexperienced coach can help us...imo sheens comes back on board we get some external help and keep Madge as our main man. Sheens can be the dad of the club(our Bennett) whilst Madge is the coach and we recruit some decent assistants
 
punt Madge-shift him side ways,2pay out his contract[much in our favour]place ,Skeletor,Brett Hodgson under Tim,s tuttalidge,B H great 4 the future,last time it leaves my lips
 
We're in a fight for the future of this club.

Are we gonna buckle to media speculation and weak player attitudes or stick with Madge, Hartigan and soon Sheens..

This is gonna take a little more time.

Im sick of the failure of the last 15+ years
 
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1412012) said:
@mike said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411734) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411363) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411362) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411360) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411354) said:
@bagnf05 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411351) said:
@cochise said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411332) said:
@2005magic said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1411324) said:
I have heard on numerous occassions in pre match comments by Maguire that the team has trained well and practiced what they have to do and then they come out on to the field and play like headless chooks with no pattern / system to defence and little to no planning.

So, doesnt the truth then have to be that on the field of battle they are falling apart under pressure? Could it be that the leadership group isnt leading by example, the captain is not inspiring them (or not on the field), and the halfback is not organising, or most worryingly, the team is dogging it. While it is true there are many young-uns in the 17, there are also enough experienced old-uns to be able to take the pressure and help the others. Yet, they are not.

If they are doing totally opposite to what has been practised on training the culprit players are in the wrong and should be sacked. Surely contracts have in them undertaking coaches instructions. If the players think they n=know better tit cant go on.

Im all for replacing Maguire if we can find someone better, but the players behind all this should not, cannot, escape the axe. If they do get a new coach, they would have to accept the direction the club is going in and not go through another massive rebuild.

Questions are being asked of the coach about why he is reporting to the club that training is going well but that is not transferring to gameday.

That’s an interesting one. It feels like we have a pretty disconnected group which I’d imagine would also be fairly obvious through the week. Do people from the senior admin not go to training and watch? What are they doing? Certainly not winning in their meetings with player managers.

Going and watching training and understanding what is happening, whether the goals of the session are being achieved, if players are hitting data etc are different things. I don't expect Pascoe to be able to go to training and determine of the training session was successful. I would also be disappointed if he is spending all day at training.

With the right experience it’s easy to tell the difference between a really connected team and one that’s got issues. I think everything would just be humming if you watched Melbourne train. I imagine some of our fellas would stroll in and probably not even acknowledge each other. That’s how they’re playing anyway.

Yes but that is not the senior management role to see that, it is Madges role. That is why he is being asked those questions.

This is where we disagree mate, from top down I’d want football nous. They’re on big money and what exactly are they doing to win us games?

Edit: This is why I like the Sheens appointment.

Maybe you do but I don’t. This is not a sole trader or small business organisation where 1 person does everything. You have specialists for each area of the organisation. Not everyone has or should have football nous, that would not be a well functioning organisation.

Then don’t send Mr Pascoe to meet the superstars and don’t put his quotes on the press release when we sign duds, he can’t have his cake and eat it too. Is he an administrator or a footy guy?

He’s the CEO and as such he will meet with potential signings. Who he meets with would be determined by Hartigan who no doubt would also be in attendance.
 
@spartan117 said in [Madge Maguire \- Mega Thread](/post/1412073) said:
We're in a fight for the future of this club.

Are we gonna buckle to media speculation and weak player attitudes or stick with Madge, Hartigan and soon Sheens..

This is gonna take a little more time.

Im sick of the failure of the last 15+ years

Sheens and Hartigan will still be here. Maguire should not.
 
Back
Top