Michael Tannous

@tigerman-0 said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1503834) said:
@ultimate-warrior said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1503804) said:
Looks good and seems arrogant. Also I noticed he seemed to bomb a fair few tries. Hire this man!

Hard marker

I like him. Reminds me of Blake Austin in that he backs himself. This also did result in him at times not giving the ball when he should have.

He can have Brooksy’s job
 
@ultimate-warrior said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1503966) said:
@tigerman-0 said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1503834) said:
@ultimate-warrior said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1503804) said:
Looks good and seems arrogant. Also I noticed he seemed to bomb a fair few tries. Hire this man!

Hard marker

I like him. Reminds me of Blake Austin in that he backs himself. This also did result in him at times not giving the ball when he should have.

He can have Brooksy’s job

Actually Blake Austin is not a bad comparison, because both (based on 5mins of video Ive seen of this kid) seem to rely on that swerve/step. Austin got worked out in that oppositions worked out if you ignore the dummy, his "show and go" was eliminated. Based purely on that video, I hope Tannous has a plan B
 
@dallas said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1503983) said:
From what I have seen he is very aggressive in defence as well even against people much larger than him

yeh i heard he can pack a punch in D....Apparently he stings in D
 
He looks like a good player from the little that I’ve seen. Good step and got a nice long pass on him as well. He looks like a proper 5/8 to me but from the highlights vid he plays a bit of hooker as well. What’s everyone’s opinion on his best position?
 
Was just watching MT's vids and this bloke looks so explosive from dummy half. I wonder if that's why we looked to Api for a couple of years? Liddle is almost certain to be gone, then you've got 2 youngsters that could take the #9 after a couple more years of development.

I would have him in the 9 based on his passing, strength and acceleration, but wouldn't be out of place at 6.
 
@hammertime said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1521129) said:
Was just watching MT's vids and this bloke looks so explosive from dummy half. I wonder if that's why we looked to Api for a couple of years? Liddle is almost certain to be gone, then you've got 2 youngsters that could take the #9 after a couple more years of development.

I would have him in the 9 based on his passing, strength and acceleration, but wouldn't be out of place at 6.

Here's our new #9.
![38bee35e-982b-4da6-82aa-58f2c98c184a-image.png](/assets/uploads/files/1642055567254-38bee35e-982b-4da6-82aa-58f2c98c184a-image.png)
 
@bathursttiger1 said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1521133) said:
@hammertime said in [Michael Tannous](/post/1521129) said:
Was just watching MT's vids and this bloke looks so explosive from dummy half. I wonder if that's why we looked to Api for a couple of years? Liddle is almost certain to be gone, then you've got 2 youngsters that could take the #9 after a couple more years of development.

I would have him in the 9 based on his passing, strength and acceleration, but wouldn't be out of place at 6.

Here's our new #9.
![38bee35e-982b-4da6-82aa-58f2c98c184a-image.png](/assets/uploads/files/1642055567254-38bee35e-982b-4da6-82aa-58f2c98c184a-image.png)

:joy: :joy:
 
Might not have the body to stand up to the riggers of the game. Wouldn’t be the first and won’t be the last.
 
Geez, injuries are giving our club an absolute caning at the moment. Last thing you need when you've got a substandard playing group as it is😡.

Hope he recovers well.
 
Back
Top