Nathan Cleary

@ said:
I agree that that is that could determine where they go. He,d be mad to ask him to come here if we aren't looking a hell of a lot better than we are now. I can't see any father dropping their son in it like that.
The interesting thing though, is that other clubs may not be as keen about a double act
If he can't get that improvement into us. .
I hope we aren't getting updates on the situation regularly next season,

I agree. This all has the potential to be a huge distraction next season, with Brooks looking over his shoulder at the beginning of a new 2 year contract. If Brooks is to improve (and he needs to), he will need some clear air, not constant speculation about his potential replacement.

To be honest, I'm disappointed in Ivan for even talking about this as we head into what may be our most anticipated off season for many a year.
 
Cleary has backed Brooks repeatedly..

We would be mad though if we didn't look at the best options in the future whist staying focused on the present..

It's what goods Clubs do..
 
@ said:
@ said:
I agree that that is that could determine where they go. He,d be mad to ask him to come here if we aren't looking a hell of a lot better than we are now. I can't see any father dropping their son in it like that.
The interesting thing though, is that other clubs may not be as keen about a double act
If he can't get that improvement into us. .
I hope we aren't getting updates on the situation regularly next season,

I agree. This all has the potential to be a huge distraction next season, with Brooks looking over his shoulder at the beginning of a new 2 year contract. If Brooks is to improve (and he needs to), he will need some clear air, not constant speculation about his potential replacement.

To be honest, I'm disappointed in Ivan for even talking about this as we head into what may be our most anticipated off season for many a year.

I don’t agree it’s smart play in every sense. There is a reason he signed Benji and it’s not just as a mentor.
Brooks needs real heat on him which, he is going to get.
Play well otherwise Benji steps in if not your replacement is signed November 1 next year. If Brooks can’t perform under pressure he will be moved on anyway.
From a personal sense he is making sure his son gets paid fairly as Penrith are well run and sign players for unders which is what they just tried to do with Nathan.
 
If Brooks plays to his potential he doesn’t have to worry about Cleary, because he will also be in big demand. We all tend to bag Brooks, but gee I have seen some bog average no7’s playing for the WT over the years who at their best were no better than Brooks on a bad day
 
@ said:
If Brooks plays to his potential he doesn’t have to worry about Cleary, because he will also be in big demand. We all tend to bag Brooks, but gee I have seen some bog average no7’s playing for the WT over the years who at their best were no better than Brooks on a bad day

Brooks needs to find another gear or two and find much needed consistency to match Cleary
 
@ said:
Cleary has backed Brooks repeatedly..

We would be mad though if we didn't look at the best options in the future whist staying focused on the present..

It's what goods Clubs do..

I'm not saying that we shouldn't look at the options, and Nathan is just what we need,and I hope that He does come here.
And They can talk about it as much as they like at home.
But it doesn't have to be played out in the media, all the way through next season, there's been to much said about it by Ivan already in the last three weeks.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Cleary has backed Brooks repeatedly..

We would be mad though if we didn't look at the best options in the future whist staying focused on the present..

It's what goods Clubs do..

I'm not saying that we shouldn't look at the options, and Nathan is just what we need,and I hope that He does come here.
And They can talk about it as much as they like at home.
But it doesn't have to be played out in the media, all the way through next season, there's been to much said about it by Ivan already in the last three weeks.

If its played out in the media, at least its for a player we have a chance of signing as opposed to losing, which is a nice change given the last 18 months.
 
@ said:
@ said:
If Brooks plays to his potential he doesn’t have to worry about Cleary, because he will also be in big demand. We all tend to bag Brooks, but gee I have seen some bog average no7’s playing for the WT over the years who at their best were no better than Brooks on a bad day

Brooks needs to find another gear or two and find much needed consistency to match Cleary

Spot on Happy, Brooks for all his talent has delivered bugger all, had a free ride under no pressure of being dropped.
He needs to have pressure on his position to maybe wake the sleeping giant, if not see you later.
Look at easts, they have the origin halfback, but they go and buy the australian halfback, if a better option comes up you take it.
 
Brooks is frustrating - because he has all the skills just not the smarts. Playing on instinct is fine if you are smart but if not much is going on upstairs - disastrous. Not sure how Luke prepares himself for games but something in his approach has to change. Maybe Benji is exactly what he needs.
 
Who knows maybe brooks will be a much better player next year with a much better forward pack in front of him
 
@ said:
Brooks is frustrating - because he has all the skills just not the smarts. Playing on instinct is fine if you are smart but if not much is going on upstairs - disastrous. Not sure how Luke prepares himself for games but something in his approach has to change. Maybe Benji is exactly what he needs.

i don't understand how he keeps kicking the ball dead and someone like ash taylor always finds the in goal
 
Here's another article on the Panthers..from a couple of days ago by Paul Kent.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/disappearing-halves-leave-panthers-plan-at-sixes-and-sevens/news-story/144225af69a2c22ca20f85a1b62a8a6d?utm_content=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=EditorialSF&utm_source=TelegraphSport&utm_medium=Facebook

Disappearing halves leave Panthers’ plan at sixes and sevens
Paul Kent, The Daily Telegraph
November 17, 2017 7:31pm

PENRITH’S famous five-year plan, about to enter its seventh season, must not include halves.

This season the Panthers have released Te Maire Martin, once considered one of the bright ones.

They also released Matt Moylan. He left for Cronulla just a year after the club signed him to a five-year deal and regarded him as the cornerstone of their future.

And Nathan Cleary might be the next to go.

This week Cleary’s father, Wests Tigers coach Ivan Cleary, told NRL.com plans are back on the table for father and son to work together.

“Basically we’re both coming to the opinion that we’d like to play together. It’s just a question of timing really,” Ivan Cleary said.

Could Nathan and Ivan Cleary work together one day?
“He’s still got two years to go at the Panthers and I think that’s good for him. He’s not in a hurry to decide that, but we both realise that this situation is a pretty unique opportunity.

“I was always conscious of never wanting to put him in a position that compromises him being up front.

“But the further (his career) is going I’m getting more confident it won’t be a problem. But we’re not thinking about it too much right now. Probably in 12 months time it will be more relevant.”

Like everything in rugby league, the interest is more what Cleary can’t say than what he did.

Nathan Cleary is contracted until the end of 2019 and unable to negotiate with rival clubs until November 1 next year. Then he begins the final season of his contract.

Ivan, as the Tigers coach, is unable to talk to his own son about his future.

But Nathan still lives at home with mum and dad and that doesn’t stop father and son from talking generally about football and what that might include.

Not that Ivan will be the only coach interested in Nathan when he is available. It probably hasn’t escaped the Roosters’ notice that Nathan comes of contract on the first day their latest investment, Cooper Cronk, walks into retirement.

Whether they like it or not the Panthers are already in a battle to retain Cleary. And they might be losing it.

Phil Gould, the general manager of football, has absolute authority at the club. He continually gets lacerated for his “five-year plan” to win a premiership even though he actually said it would take “half a decade” to get the salary cap in order which, most presumed, also meant it would have them in premiership contention.

It was welcoming news at the time. Finally the club was going to prepare for long-term success.

Yet in that time Gould has sacked Ivan Cleary because he took a look at him at a press conference after Penrith played Parramatta in Darwin and decided he looked “tired”. The Penrith board did not know Cleary was sacked until they read about it.

Being sleepy was a new one when it came to sacking coaches. Most clubs would have tossed in some spending money and sent the coach on a holiday and told him not to come back until the new year.

Gould and Cleary were already butting heads, though. Cleary wanted to release Jamie Soward and James Segeyaro but Gould denied him. Gould then released them the following season, after he sacked Cleary.

Phil Gould has absolute authority at Penrith.
Cleary wanted to keep Api Koroisau but Gould released him. There were a number of disagreements about roster management.

Gould had always stated that his intention was to get the club in such a place it would make his job redundant.

It just might have been.

There was tension between them and Gould won.

Still, the club trusted Gould’s decision because he was building towards something. Successful clubs plan for the long term. It’s hard to see how that still exists.

Moylan is 26 and Martin is 22\. Yet they are gone. James Maloney was bought to replace Moylan and he is 31\. It makes for an odd future if you are planning for long-term success.

It leaves Cleary as the future of the club and yet we saw him exposed in the playoffs this year when he was left with no Plan B in the game plan when Brisbane refused to surrender their tryline.

At the time, Moylan was stood down because he had “personal” issues.

“Personal issues”, or words to that effect, are a euphemism for mental-welfare issues, which we also know are phrases increasingly being used by clubs and players to discourage further examination.

Don’t ask, don’t pry, you just might tip our guy over the edge. It’s a Get Out Of Jail Free card for clubs with internal trouble.

Moylan has told friends his reasons for wanting out were nothing more than he could not stand Anthony Griffin any longer.

He was offended at the insinuation he had mental-health issues and now he has landed at Cronulla after he stuck solid on his refusal to work with coach Griffin, who Gould appointed to replace Cleary without interviewing anybody else.

Te Maire Martin left Penrith to join the Cowboys.
Martin was let go because Griffin believed he was too small and not tough enough to play in the NRL.

He went to North Queensland and slipped in immediately. He was a solid performer in the Cowboys’ unlikely drive to a grand final appearance and on Saturday will run out as the starting five-eighth in New Zealand’s World Cup quarter-final against Fiji.

Individually, all these decisions and actions can be justified.

Collectively, it begins to look a little shaky.

Salary cap management is a da Vinci notebook, a mix of science and art. Everybody wins and loses, the trick being to win more than you lose.

It’s hard to see the Panthers are moving forward here, or whether they have been for some time..
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I agree that that is that could determine where they go. He,d be mad to ask him to come here if we aren't looking a hell of a lot better than we are now. I can't see any father dropping their son in it like that.
The interesting thing though, is that other clubs may not be as keen about a double act
If he can't get that improvement into us. .
I hope we aren't getting updates on the situation regularly next season,

I agree. This all has the potential to be a huge distraction next season, with Brooks looking over his shoulder at the beginning of a new 2 year contract. If Brooks is to improve (and he needs to), he will need some clear air, not constant speculation about his potential replacement.
\
\
I don’t agree it’s smart play in every sense. There is a reason he signed Benji and it’s not just as a mentor.
Brooks needs real heat on him which, he is going to get.
Play well otherwise Benji steps in if not your replacement is signed November 1 next year. If Brooks can’t perform under pressure he will be moved on anyway.
From a personal sense he is making sure his son gets paid fairly as Penrith are well run and sign players for unders which is what they just tried to do with Nathan.

To be honest, I'm disappointed in Ivan for even talking about this as we head into what may be our most anticipated off season for many a year.

I am taking those last words to heart. I totally agree. Brooks stayed, and will probably want to stay.
If he suddenly thinks " OK Nathan Cleary is going to take my spot no matter what…." Then he will be a bunch of nerves.

Personally I think Brooks is borderline half, borderline 5/8\. We could move Brooks to 5/8 and move Reynolds to Center (or Hooker as everyone suggests). But Brooks needs a clear season under Ivan and should have a fair run for 18/19.

Naturally if Brooks does not perform because he hasn't performed. He can be dropped to reserve half and Marshall can take up the spot. If he is performing... well it could ruin 2019.

Ivan, keep talking about the bus and let your son play for Penrith till 2020.
 
Brooks has a prettygoodforward pack this year for mine.

Time for excuses for him are over.

Perform this year or start planning for life after him.
 
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.
 
I don't see it as a coincidence Brooks was only signed for 2 years. Not at all. Less to payout if Brooks doesn't step up. We can then pressure Penrith to get Cleary early. Worked with Moylan, Moylan's five year deal didn't even last 1 year, though hopefully Cleary has more integrity than Moylan. Moylan's tantrums reminded me too much of Moses.

Personally I hope col is right and Brooks stays as a 5/8, Reynolds to hooker, and we nab Cleary as 1/2\. That would be something!
 
@ said:
I don't see it as a coincidence Brooks was only signed for 2 years. Not at all. Less to payout if Brooks doesn't step up. We can then pressure Penrith to get Cleary early. Worked with Moylan, Moylan's five year deal didn't even last 1 year, though hopefully Cleary has more integrity than Moylan. Moylan's tantrums reminded me too much of Moses.

Personally I hope col is right and Brooks stays as a 5/8, Reynolds to hooker, and we nab Cleary as 1/2\. That would be something!

I don't think Nathan is going to be the same sort of grub that Moylan was.
 
@ said:
Was it just coincidental that Ivan only signed Brooks for 2 years, knowing Nathan was off contract at the same time.

I'm going to say yes. The plan was to always splinter the contracts of Brooks, Moses, Woods and Tedesco, and not have them all coming off contract at the same time again. Brooks was always going to get the shortest offer out of the 4.

On Cleary's comments about Nathan, I wouldn't be surprised if they were partly a tactical ploy to stick a rocket up Brooks. It's got to be embarrassing for him that his coach is talking about a potential replacement for him, two years down the track. Let's see how he responds.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top