Pascoe sanctioned by the NRL

I keep coming back to the NRL knowing something that wasn't made public. An offer without acceptance isn't a contract - unless it was verbal acceptance - so no contract and nothing to tear up. It's just the over sensitive NRL having their feelings hurt because no-one told them. Anyhow we'll find out soon enough.
 
@Plato said:
I keep coming back to the NRL knowing something that wasn’t made public.
Click to expand...

I don't think the NRL have told the public everything they know, I would expect they would hold off on that until after the submissions from the club, so I expect to know more either way by Friday.
 
Don't you think that the NRL has a responsibility to the club the full reasons why they sanctioned Pascoe?
The club and their lawyers have committed a lot of time and money making a case based on the reasons the NRL has provided them.
 
@Newtown said:
Don’t you think that the NRL has a responsibility to the club the full reasons why they sanctioned Pascoe?
The club and their lawyers have committed a lot of time and money making a case based on the reasons the NRL has provided them.
Click to expand...

The club is not the public?
The club would have been given a lot more detail than the general public, they wouldn't have been able to respond otherwise.
 
I did hear from a reliable source (same one who said Maguire had signed) that the Sharks will have to give up one big name player as well as another NRL player. I am keeping my fingers crossed that some good will come of this and we can nab Bronson Xerri. I read his family is close to Flanno and he was WTs; fan as a kid.
 
He never mentioned anything about the public. And the suggestion that the NRL have an ace up their sleeve is ridiculous to be frank. Charges/allegations/facts are tendered before you get a chance to defend them - that's how it works.
 
@Dan_Blanco said:
He never mentioned anything about the public. And the suggestion that the NRL have an ace up their sleeve is ridiculous to be frank. Charges/allegations/facts are tendered before you get a chance to defend them - that’s how it works.
Click to expand...

I assumed he was responding to my post that was directly before his, I may be wrong though

@cochise said:
I don’t think the NRL have told the public everything they know, I would expect they would hold off on that until after the submissions from the club, so I expect to know more either way by Friday.
Click to expand...

I would expect that the NRL told the club exactly the reasons for their findings, I would doubt they would be adding to what they have alleged we have done.
 
The NRL rules state that the last player signed is the first one to be let go.
 
@cochise said:
It has been said a couple of times this week, I just don’t know if its true. Never has been the case in the past.
Click to expand...

Yeah, it doesn't seem to have happened that way in the past, but maybe that's because they managed to offload another player.
 
@Masterton said:
Yeah, it doesn’t seem to have happened that way in the past, but maybe that’s because they managed to offload another player.
Click to expand...

Parramatta just wasn't allowed to play for points until they were cap compliant.
 
Would love to see the forums reaction if that does happen. I'll grab the popcorn
 
They mentioned it on radio today… Storm over the cap and. Last player resigned was scam smyth.... Talk sharks re-signed segeyaro on minimal contract (150k)because their last player signed before segs was Shaun johnson...preferable to. Lose segs than SJ
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 461 (members: 31, guests: 430)
Back
Top