Tweed_Tiger
Well-known member
@tiger_one said:Kasiano
Wasn't he on a heavily back ended contract at the dogs also?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@tiger_one said:Kasiano
@Snake said:**Over the cap is CHEATING** plain and simple … these are multimillion dollar business all of them looking to get one over there rivals . Does anyone think that spending over the cap is a mistake… the NRL have a problem IMO with the harsh punishment dished out to the Tigers with the deregistering of the CEO for 12months .Other clubs now seem to have been deliberately cheating the cap to gain ADVANTAGE over there rivals so what type of punishment would that entail considering the heavy penalty given to the Tigers who by face value did not cheat the cap to gain ADVANTAGE over a rival . This is black and white !spending over the cap intentionally is cheating so let the NRL start rolling out the life bans for the CEO’s involved , there heavy penalty to the Tigers has set the bench mark !!
@Fraze23 said:Spot on. Being 600K over the cap is more of a competitive advantage than offering an ambassadors role. How does a club end up that far over the cap and it be classified as anything other than cheating? Administrative error perhaps? :thinking:
In my opinion being 600K over is far worse than what we have done. So if the NRL are fair dinkum and the figures stated by the media are factual, they have to deregister Dave Donaghy for gross incompetence or for cheating.
@cochise said:It really depends on what conversations the Storm have had with the NRL and what the NRL allow.
@Fraze23 said:How does that make a difference? If you’re over the cap, you’re over the cap. Greenberg himself said the rules are clear.
@supercoach said:I thought you could not register a contract when your books were over the cap. Anyway I guess the cap only comes into play from when the whistle blows for round one
@bathursttiger said:The NRL has told the Storm unless they are under the cap by Round 1 they will forfeit the first game.
@cochise said:Because the NRL do not view it as being over the cap until you play a game over the cap
@Bones said:Unless it’s an ambassador role that hasn’t been taken up yet, that’s still counted.
@cochise said:The NRL rules state that the last player signed is the first one to be let go.
I don’t think that is actually true.
@diedpretty said:They don’t have to let them go but they can’t play them until they are cap compliant.