Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:@ said:@ said:Really. I’m sure that came into his 2016 750,000 salary that we paid Souths…
Someone should be sacked for failing to do the figures.
You can’t tell me other clubs haven’t done the same?
I'm pretty sure someone will be sacked
Who?
@ said:depressing being a tigers fan never any good luck
@ said:The only way it could come under salary cap was if his ambassador role was used as an inducement to stay on but on a lower salary - for instance if we were going to pay him 750k but did a deal to pay him 500k with the promise of a 250 k a year job when he retires. I can't think of any other way,
@ said:Will this affect us signing anyone else?
@ said:@ said:The only way it could come under salary cap was if his ambassador role was used as an inducement to stay on but on a lower salary - for instance if we were going to pay him 750k but did a deal to pay him 500k with the promise of a 250 k a year job when he retires. I can't think of any other way,
That's pretty much the crux of the matter. You can't offer post contract guaranteed money. It was always going to be cap liable.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Really. I’m sure that came into his 2016 750,000 salary that we paid Souths…
Someone should be sacked for failing to do the figures.
You can’t tell me other clubs haven’t done the same?
I'm pretty sure someone will be sacked
Who?
The person who organised it. He's supposedly in the firing line.
@ said:@ said:@ said:The only way it could come under salary cap was if his ambassador role was used as an inducement to stay on but on a lower salary - for instance if we were going to pay him 750k but did a deal to pay him 500k with the promise of a 250 k a year job when he retires. I can't think of any other way,
That's pretty much the crux of the matter. You can't offer post contract guaranteed money. It was always going to be cap liable.
How did the NRL find out - must have been someone with a gripe against the club.
@ said:@ said:@ said:The only way it could come under salary cap was if his ambassador role was used as an inducement to stay on but on a lower salary - for instance if we were going to pay him 750k but did a deal to pay him 500k with the promise of a 250 k a year job when he retires. I can't think of any other way,
That's pretty much the crux of the matter. You can't offer post contract guaranteed money. It was always going to be cap liable.
How did the NRL find out - must have been someone with a gripe against the club.
@ said:Common you gooses concentrate on the true cap cheats in this comp, funny how minor issue are found at the minor clubs while the Bondi brigade and our northern neighbours are left to ply their dirty trade…..makes me sick
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:The only way it could come under salary cap was if his ambassador role was used as an inducement to stay on but on a lower salary - for instance if we were going to pay him 750k but did a deal to pay him 500k with the promise of a 250 k a year job when he retires. I can't think of any other way,
That's pretty much the crux of the matter. You can't offer post contract guaranteed money. It was always going to be cap liable.
How did the NRL find out - must have been someone with a gripe against the club.
I actually think Robbie himself mentioned it in a media article mid year when he came over to us. At the time I thought that was incredibly dumb.
@ said:Yoss said bad but not catastrophic.
Losing Pascoe would be catastrophic.