Pascoe sanctioned by the NRL

@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

Here is some evidence from June this year regarding the possibilty that clubs like Wests Tigers and Sharks could be forced out of the NRL to make way for a Papua New Guinea club;

"Bold bid for Labor to back PNG's entry into the NRL
By Adrian Proszenko
30 June 2018

A motion tabled at the NSW Labor Party annual conference could be the key to the introduction of a Papua New Guinean team entering the NRL in the future.

The motion, proposed by Inner West Council Mayor Darcy Byrne and seconded by Member for Kingsford Smith, Matt Thistlethwaite, calls for a future Federal Labor Government to support PNG’s NRL bid as a foreign policy initiative.

PNG is the only country in the world that can claim rugby league as its national sport and recent results have proven the nation has considerable talent in its ranks. "
 
@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

I do not need any evidence of that … the Pascoe situation has nothing to do with relocation but the NRL would be concerned that the Tigers are getting there act together as they would of been seen as easy targets for relocation ... Greenberg and his cronies are fools if they think the Tigers will be a push over .. the club needs to push back now and stamp there authority.
 
@ said:
@ said:
For those mentioning the link to Gould. The NRL began investigating something that has been public knowledge for 3 years 2 months ago.

What was happening 2 months ago?

I am sure that Ivan (Mr Integrity) Cleary who sits on the NRL’s premiership committee would have nothing to do with this. His successor would struggle to match his 47% SuperCoach record while managing a cap penalty for 3 years.

For those mentioning super league, we might be seeing it. One southern team & wests territory to be split (as per original merger proposals) between Parramatta and Canterbury

We resigned Farah 2 months ago. Is it to do with that? I dunno, the timing is a bit weird.

Perhaps that is the issue

If he didn't come back as a player …...

But as I said in my email to Greenburg , shouldn't the NRL be proactive in that situation (or any other issue that the agreement entailed ) and inform the club once the contract was lodged that is was going to be an issue

That's my point and was my main point to Greenberg , the club had been talking about offering a post career job to RF when he got his LIfe membership

Shouldn't they as a responsible leader of the game asked the club what its intentions were back then , be proactive not reactionary ......
 
Make no bones about it, Cronulla are goners!

https://thewest.com.au/sport/rugby-league/cronulla-sharks-face-relocation-with-nrl-preparing-to-take-over-licence-ng-67be9d2efb89772f8fc90965e0a4a558

https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/cronulla-sharks-could-face-nrl-relocation/63958e5c-e686-40aa-8e63-f0240316a01f
 
@ said:
Make no bones about it, Cronulla are goners!

https://thewest.com.au/sport/rugby-league/cronulla-sharks-face-relocation-with-nrl-preparing-to-take-over-licence-ng-67be9d2efb89772f8fc90965e0a4a558

https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/cronulla-sharks-could-face-nrl-relocation/63958e5c-e686-40aa-8e63-f0240316a01f

You have to remember there is a very big possibility of the public purse being used to bail out the Sharks. Remember the grant this undeserving club received from the Commonwealth to upgrade the stadium when Bruce Baird was the Local Member? This club is in COALmo's electorate and has close links to the Shire's version of Hillsong at Sutherland (Shire Live).
 
@ said:
@ said:
Make no bones about it, Cronulla are goners!

https://thewest.com.au/sport/rugby-league/cronulla-sharks-face-relocation-with-nrl-preparing-to-take-over-licence-ng-67be9d2efb89772f8fc90965e0a4a558

https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/cronulla-sharks-could-face-nrl-relocation/63958e5c-e686-40aa-8e63-f0240316a01f

You have to remember there is a very big possibility of the public purse being used to bail out the Sharks. Remember the grant this undeserving club received from the Commonwealth to upgrade the stadium when Bruce Baird was the Local Member? This club is in COALmo's electorate and has close links to the Shire's version of Hillsong at Sutherland (Shire Live).

Oh yes I'd forgotten that the current PM is an avid Sharks supporter - they change so often! Lol Nice to have friends in high places.

The thing is it won't bode well for us then if Cronulla are somehow saved.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Make no bones about it, Cronulla are goners!

https://thewest.com.au/sport/rugby-league/cronulla-sharks-face-relocation-with-nrl-preparing-to-take-over-licence-ng-67be9d2efb89772f8fc90965e0a4a558

https://wwos.nine.com.au/nrl/cronulla-sharks-could-face-nrl-relocation/63958e5c-e686-40aa-8e63-f0240316a01f

You have to remember there is a very big possibility of the public purse being used to bail out the Sharks. Remember the grant this undeserving club received from the Commonwealth to upgrade the stadium when Bruce Baird was the Local Member? This club is in COALmo's electorate and has close links to the Shire's version of Hillsong at Sutherland (Shire Live).

Oh yes I'd forgotten that the current PM is an avid Sharks supporter - they change so often! Lol Nice to have friends in high places.

The thing is it won't bode well for us then if Cronulla are somehow saved.

The current PM is only months away from being the X PM. Even Billy boy could not stuff the next election up
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

I do not need any evidence of that … the Pascoe situation has nothing to do with relocation but the NRL would be concerned that the Tigers are getting there act together as they would of been seen as easy targets for relocation ... Greenberg and his cronies are fools if they think the Tigers will be a push over .. the club needs to push back now and stamp there authority.

I agree, we looked an easy target, lets hope the idiots at HQ have bitten off more than they can chew this time with us 😛ray:
 
Wests Ashfield won't be as easily pressured by the nrl. They won't back down from a fight.
 
@ said:
Wests Ashfield won't be as easily pressured by the nrl. They won't back down from a fight.

When Greenburg and Weeks publcily tarnish the reputation of our CEO and in doing so damage his current and future employment prospects, it follows there may be serious repercussions. Let's hope the wheel of justice is in motion.
 
Oh yes, his reputation has been severely tarnished. The NRL may well be thinking what the heck have we done? Talk about bully boy tactics. I have a feeling that JP will come out of this OK.
 
@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

There are reports in the DT ( Yes i know) that when the sharks are fined for the salary cap mess should they not be able to pay the NRL will immediately takeover the licence. Not hard to guess what they would do then.
 
@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

It’s called an opinion. Here’s another example of an opinion: I think your constant ridiculing of other forum members posts is pathetic.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

It’s called an opinion. Here’s another example of an opinion: I think your constant ridiculing of other forum members posts is pathetic.

Outlandish opinions usually get more traction when backed with evidence. Claiming that Greenburg and the NRL don't want our club to be successful is a ridiculous assertion.
 
It'd be hilarious if a director the NRL formerly appointed to administrate the club will wind up bringing them undone. Karmic retribution at its finest.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

It’s called an opinion. Here’s another example of an opinion: I think your constant ridiculing of other forum members posts is pathetic.

Outlandish opinions usually get more traction when backed with evidence. Claiming that Greenburg and the NRL don't want our club to be successful is a ridiculous assertion.

That’s your opinion. I believe what I’ve said. We are constantly up against it on and off the field. What’s happening at Cronulla now is evidence enough of the NRL manipulating the success of clubs. Brisbane’s draw, their cap issues and how they were dealt with - two examples of blatant favouritism.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
News this morning (Nine.com) that NRL want sharks to relocate.
There is an agenda!
I am starting to believe that Pascoe was deregistered because he was making us a financial success thus sustainable for the future. NRL don’t want that.

I’m sure you have evidence of this to make such ridiculous claims.

It’s called an opinion. Here’s another example of an opinion: I think your constant ridiculing of other forum members posts is pathetic.

Spot on. There are know-all's in all walks of life i guess. It's an honour to have a resident one.
 
Does anyone know if we were under the cap the last couple of years -since 2016 to be able to have included the Full value of the Farah ambassador role in the cap?
I’m think If we were in 2016 we would have used that opportunity to frontload some contracts for the following year.
We did play 2017 with 1 million less with the payouts to Farah and Sironen so I guess we didn’t have room that year.
What about last year?
 
@ said:
Does anyone know if we were under the cap the last couple of years -since 2016 to be able to have included the Full value of the Farah ambassador role in the cap?
I’m think If we were in 2016 we would have used that opportunity to frontload some contracts for the following year.
We did play 2017 with 1 million less with the payouts to Farah and Sironen so I guess we didn’t have room that year.
What about last year?

I think we should have had some space in 2018 to front load some, but that's only a guess.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Does anyone know if we were under the cap the last couple of years -since 2016 to be able to have included the Full value of the Farah ambassador role in the cap?
I’m think If we were in 2016 we would have used that opportunity to frontload some contracts for the following year.
We did play 2017 with 1 million less with the payouts to Farah and Sironen so I guess we didn’t have room that year.
What about last year?

I think we should have had some space in 2018 to front load some, but that's only a guess.

Even still it seems ridiculous to include it before the fact.
For us to have to include it this year, there needs to be a guarantee that Farah takes on the role.
The cap punishments to Parramatta and Manly were purely about promised payments that weren’t able to be obtained as approved third party deals, that’s why they had to be included into the cap. Kieren Forans deal wax one I believe.
Now this isn’t a third party deal that hasn’t been approved, this is an offer of employment that hasn’t been accepted to this point. In typing this I have realised that the nrl have not actually base our punishment on any prerequisite event that has occurred before.
I know their spin of any future club deal needs to be discussed with the cap auditor and included in the cap as had the Minichillo or Thurston deals. And makes sense when the transfer of any payment has occurred.
If and when Farah takes the deal, that year it should be included. To force us to include it into this years cap if we don’t actually end up having to pay Farah any further money if he doesn’t accept the deal just seems a complete joke.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top