goldcoast_tiger
New member
@Snake said:@Black'n'White said:@Tiger78 said:Littletiger you wouldnt think that the 24 players listed would take up 6.5 mil or there abouts, if they are then some players are seriously getting over paided for the performances being dished up.
We are currently dealing with alot of sins of the past, problems left to the current admin as gifts from the muppets preceeding them.
There is also the loan we took out from the NRL, which IIRC is guaranteed by being deducted from our yearly allocation from the NRL. Most club use the yearly grant to cover their salary cap. We are known to be financially struggling to begin with, neverlone not starting on par with the rest of the competition.
I dont know if the current Administration are the right people to turn it around, only time will tell. What i do know is that I rather them at the helm rather than the scourge that ran the place into the ground in the first place.
You can hear it in the fans, our thoughts echoed by the vermin in the media, that we are all tired of where we are as a club, we are tired of being told year after year that we are re-building, tired of being perennial underachievers.
Our only solace is that this time its a new group of people with greater business acumen are trying to right the ship. Its unfair to burden them with the failed promises of past. From Marina Go, down to Taylor and Co. we at least seem to have a plan. Thats more than we have ever had before, and we have definitely never had everyone pulling in the same direction.
I want to see some signings as much as the next fan, though would rather nobody than a signing that doesnt move us forward quality wise. We need to break the cycle that has us in this rut to begin with.
When one half of your organisation is bankrupt , the other half has to get a loan to keep the Joint venture viable is it any wonder the club is under the pump. I do not read to much about this side of the organisation it is like lets forget that 50% of the finances are not being funded or available .Maybe this should be discussed a bit more how this has certainly put the club on the back foot! I do not care what part of the venture it is but it must be a major part of what is happening ,surely it is not the salary cap alone.
I was under the impression , that the loan was to Balmain , and had nothing to do with WT' s. Nothing to do with Blame.
I just thought that I read somewhere that that loan is purely a Balmain thing WTs are not liable for it