@hammertime said:@spudoakes said:@cultured bogan said:Of course I'm more than happy for government money to be spent upgrading the public schools, but it was a poorly thought out and poorly executed scheme. The only real beneficiaries of this were the builders who pocketed an absolute fortune for these projects by basically writing their own cheque. Sure a few schools may have got some classrooms or a canteen they desperately needed, but there are schools that are having second halls and libraries built that will serve absolutely no purpose to them.
The government should have spent more time on the scheme appointing qualified people to conduct a strict tendering process to ensure the government was getting value on every single project that went ahead. In one instance, it cost $850,000 to build a canteen! It was poor form by the government to let these inflated submissions be signed off on without questioning them at the very least.
great idea lets throw more tax money at commitees maybe we would not have needed such extensive work done in schools if the last government hadnt robbed the education system if u ask me and nobody would why do we waste money on state governments we should a centralised system for the whole of australia
Here, here.
Honestly, all they actually needed to do is have the p&c committees source the builders and quotes. Instead of a beurecacy. But, like not eliminating foil insulation, they didn't research or think about the policy structure…. **Nor did they fix either when things started going wrong!**
Yeah, there was no follow up. Did they not retain final payment until the site was inspected by the government and all defects are rectified? A P&C committee would butcher any builder that did half a job! I don't expect a committee to be formed to review the findings or anything, the damage is already done as far as I'm concerned & it would only waste more money…