@formerguest said in [Rabbitohs ace forced out\.\.\.\.](/post/1257684) said:
If there is the possibility of something underhanded, sure investigate, but I see no difference with an injury based retirement. Mental health is just another medical condition and should be treated the same as any debilitating physical injury.
I agree that mental health should be taken seriously but this is not a retirement
Do we know that?
Roberts is 27 yrs old, mental health issues/disorders can be treated, no doctor in the world would say a mental health issue will last the person the next 6 years and can not be improved upon with treatment. Unless that doctor is employed by Souths.
Anything can be treated, whether successfully or not is another matter depending on the illness and individual. Each case has to be judged on it's merits and it is unfair to cast judgement at this point and what may occur up to six years down the track is irrelevant.
Not irrelevant if they were trying to retire him. But they aren't trying to retire him, they aren't even going that far.
It's a sham, he walks away from approximately half a million dollars to become unemployed? Because he's seeking treatment which may take a few weeks/months? Ridiculous. No way does he do that without Souths topping up his pocket on the side.
How stupid does the NRL think we are to let Souths get away with this. For all the 'good' things V'landys has done, it's the same old corrupt boys club.
Nothing had happened yet in regards to how the NRL view it in regards to south's cap.
So maybe I'm going off my nutter early? The question may not even be asked in the public sphere.
I wonder if I can put money on JAC ending up at Souths, would have to be short odds.
I guess with Ingliss being given special dispensation at South's when retired, Burgess and the recent events, now Roberts - there is reason for some going off early on this one.