D
Deleted member 3518
Guest
@jc99 said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306053) said:@mike said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1306048) said:@jc99 said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1305996) said:@strongee said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1305986) said:@jc99 said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1305967) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Round 1 Team](/post/1305964) said:On last nights performance Laurie goes to 6 for round 1 imo. I think Tuki and Stefano were really impressive.
I also don’t think Liddle is a shoe in, Simpkin looked good..
Stef was one I was really keeping and eye on and he was excellent. I thought Simpkin was better than Liddle in the game but Liddle still played well, Simpkin did well at lock too.
Nah , disagree there. The team lacked direction and were all over the place . Exactly how Simpkin was playing. Liddle looked like , he was just cruising, and the team relaxed around that.
Liddle was definitely just cruising because he only ran the ball properly twice and one of those times he lost us a few metres. Again he didn't play bad but Simpkin showed way more out there yesterday.
Running hookers are the way of the future, even Madge mentioned he liked what Simpkin did and Liddle looked good when he did run so I reckon that's what he wants.
Liddle did what he was meant todo, distribute the ball and he did it very, very well. Because it was a trial and constant interchanges there really wasn’t the opportunity to take on tired forwards and so he didn’t. That’s a cool head right there.
He did his job and played fine. There was definitely opportunity to run more though but he decided to just pass and there's nothing wrong with that, good hit out for him
He didn’t have to mate . Maybe he’s 24 , not 19 , and realised something that sinks in as you get older . Pace yourself , it’s a long season , and there a 120 kg behemoth who’s probably going to bend the line better than you are , at a set defence .