Round 22 discussion *Spoilers

@hsvjones said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443492) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443482) said:
@telltails said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443476) said:
What a rubbish penalty.

correct penalty.

Kelly beat Radley there and Radley came almost from the side and attacked the legs. Desperation or not, you can't put a man under a risk of injury like this.

Fair and correct call.

I don't approve of the "he was trying to do his best" arguement. Same with fullbacks rushing in and hitting a player trying to score a try. That player has beaten you and now you're trying your best but you can't put the person under stress.

100% Correct call.

So was the last Penalty for a whack across the face. Suck it Broncos
 
If you listen to the audio Perenara didn’t even notice the high tackle. He had to be promoted by the ref to take another look.
 
@mike said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443495) said:
@hsvjones said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443492) said:
@tig_prmz said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443482) said:
@telltails said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443476) said:
What a rubbish penalty.

correct penalty.

Kelly beat Radley there and Radley came almost from the side and attacked the legs. Desperation or not, you can't put a man under a risk of injury like this.

Fair and correct call.

I don't approve of the "he was trying to do his best" arguement. Same with fullbacks rushing in and hitting a player trying to score a try. That player has beaten you and now you're trying your best but you can't put the person under stress.

100% Correct call.

So was the last Penalty for a whack across the face. Suck it Broncos

Yes both correct calls to me...
 
Paid attention to the million dollar man tonight…typical game from what I think of manu. Didn’t play bad. Possibly could have been injured. I still have to watch last weeks roosters game.
 
@shooter-mcgavin said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443501) said:
Cronk unbearable commentary


You would think he was a Rooster 1 club man....hes become such a fan boy of that club now.
 
@tiger-ferret said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443507) said:
Paid attention to the million dollar man tonight…typical game from what I think of manu. Didn’t play bad. Possibly could have been injured. I still have to watch last weeks roosters game.

Manu did bugger all .
Not worth anywhere near the likes of Teddy, Latrell or Turbo.
 
Will Trent Robinson complain in the presser? Or does that only apply when the rules are applied against his team like that.

Clearly barely a high tackle and also incorrect use of the captains challenge. You can challenge a decision but not a non decision. That’s twice this weekend they got it wrong. In the Melbourne game they got an extra challenge because they infringed before what the challenges happened (and they were wrong anyway).

They have just shown everyone what to do. Minor head contact, knock on before playing the ball and you will get the penalty.
 
@cktiger said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443516) said:
@tiger-ferret said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443507) said:
Paid attention to the million dollar man tonight…typical game from what I think of manu. Didn’t play bad. Possibly could have been injured. I still have to watch last weeks roosters game.

Manu did bugger all .
Not worth anywhere near the likes of Teddy, Latrell or Turbo.

Game in tha balance. Attacking in the 30 and he’s out on the wing
 
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443517) said:
Will Trent Robinson complain in the presser? Or does that only apply when the rules are applied against his team like that.

Clearly barely a high tackle and also incorrect use of the captains challenge. You can challenge a decision but not a non decision. That’s twice this weekend they got it wrong. In the Melbourne game they got an extra challenge because they infringed before what the challenges happened (and they were wrong anyway).

They have just shown everyone what to do. Minor head contact, knock on before playing the ball and you will get the penalty.

Maybe they were challenging the decision of not making a decision.
 
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443517) said:
Will Trent Robinson complain in the presser? Or does that only apply when the rules are applied against his team like that.

Clearly barely a high tackle and also incorrect use of the captains challenge. You can challenge a decision but not a non decision. That’s twice this weekend they got it wrong. In the Melbourne game they got an extra challenge because they infringed before what the challenges happened (and they were wrong anyway).

They have just shown everyone what to do. Minor head contact, knock on before playing the ball and you will get the penalty.

Typical roosters favouritism.
 
@bagnf05 said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443524) said:
@chicken_faced_killa said in [Round 22 discussion \*Spoilers](/post/1443517) said:
Will Trent Robinson complain in the presser? Or does that only apply when the rules are applied against his team like that.

Clearly barely a high tackle and also incorrect use of the captains challenge. You can challenge a decision but not a non decision. That’s twice this weekend they got it wrong. In the Melbourne game they got an extra challenge because they infringed before what the challenges happened (and they were wrong anyway).

They have just shown everyone what to do. Minor head contact, knock on before playing the ball and you will get the penalty.

Typical roosters favouritism.

Roosters had some pretty bad calls against them too. Was a wobbly night from the referees on both sides
 
Back
Top