Black_n_White
New member
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:I read that and I just wonder how people make comparisons to the Lodge thing. Okay yes this article is written with a positive slant and a lot of the stuff we have read on Lodge is coming from a negative slant, but I keep saying you can not compare the two. One did his time, paid what the court required and basically turned his life around in so many ways. The other, well seems to have come up short. I am not blaming Lodge, I am sure he is under starters orders from his lawyers, but I do think Greenberg jumped the gun, and maybe another year out of the NRL might have been the way to go
This is Packers 3rd season back and still hasnt paid the final amount… Why cant Lodge get that same latitude?
Are you serious? Packer is about to finish paying $300k in 3 years. Try paying $100k a year after tax … it ain't easy. Lodge has not paid a cent and doesn't appear to be willing to pay anything. There's no comparison and any suggestion there is, is delusional.
Of course I'm serious. Packer is the same thug as Lodge and needs to be given time to sort out his mess 'while' playing rugby league.
Whats your timeframe here Watto. Being extremely serious, because everyone knows Lodge has jumped jurisdiction on this one, hence the argument that he has zero intention of making good in any way, shape or form.
If you personally cannot see the difference between someone doing time, then making the financial restitution in a prompt manner once they re-enter the workforce, and Lodge running away on a technicality then there is no talking sense to you.
I whole heartedly agree that neither can take their offences back, not only their lives but the lives of their victims were irreparably changed in both events.
So give us a time frame Watto. The time in which you put your name on the line for Lodge, then accept that your name is as good as the person you are defending if they fall through. Im all for you defending the guy, and his opportunity to make ammends… But if you are going to vouch for him, you are going to eat the dirt as far as your judgement is concerned from that day on. Considering he didnt have incarceration voiding his ability to work hence earn, obviously has to be taken into account retrospectively if you are in any way serious.