Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497981) said:
@tiger_scott said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497975) said:
Mole article also saying Canberra want Liddle for Hodson. Maybe we do a player swap again? We cover the disparity in salaries, they get Liddle for a year and we get Hodson. Both sides can reassess after the year, whether to go again with the same arrangement or swap back.

Interesting they didn't want Simpkin.

Quick hit those dislike buttons!!!!!!

Simpkin is part of the long term plan Russ. Jacob isn't I'm afraid.
 
@tiger_scott said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497975) said:
Mole article also saying Canberra want Liddle for Hodson. Maybe we do a player swap again? We cover the disparity in salaries, they get Liddle for a year and we get Hodson. Both sides can reassess after the year, whether to go again with the same arrangement or swap back.

If the Raiders want Liddle, they can pay Hodgson's salaey and we can pay Liddle's salary, or tell them to go jump in the lake.
Play hard ball for once.
 
@bathursttiger1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1498006) said:
@tiger_scott said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497975) said:
Mole article also saying Canberra want Liddle for Hodson. Maybe we do a player swap again? We cover the disparity in salaries, they get Liddle for a year and we get Hodson. Both sides can reassess after the year, whether to go again with the same arrangement or swap back.

If the Raiders want Liddle, they can pay Hodgson's salaey and we can pay Liddle's salary, or tell them to take go jump in the lake.
Play hard ball for once.

Exactly. Didn’t Pascoe meet some guy in Big W and said we were holding out for more money. Now we’ll just pay his whole wage. Makes no sense
 
@willow said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497997) said:
@russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497981) said:
@tiger_scott said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497975) said:
Mole article also saying Canberra want Liddle for Hodson. Maybe we do a player swap again? We cover the disparity in salaries, they get Liddle for a year and we get Hodson. Both sides can reassess after the year, whether to go again with the same arrangement or swap back.

Interesting they didn't want Simpkin.

Quick hit those dislike buttons!!!!!!

Simpkin is part of the long term plan Russ. Jacob isn't I'm afraid.

Maybe 2022 will change their mind.
 
@bathursttiger1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1498006) said:
@tiger_scott said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497975) said:
Mole article also saying Canberra want Liddle for Hodson. Maybe we do a player swap again? We cover the disparity in salaries, they get Liddle for a year and we get Hodson. Both sides can reassess after the year, whether to go again with the same arrangement or swap back.

If the Raiders want Liddle, they can pay Hodgson's salaey and we can pay Liddle's salary, or tell them to go jump in the lake.
Play hard ball for once.

Yeah I'm getting cold feet on a liddle Hodgson swap
 
@THE_POM was saying we had a 2 year deal ready for Hodgson but not sure if we have actually given it to them or not ? Than you add the police troubles for there current hooker and it doesn't look good. For me if they want Liddle its a no Brainer if Liddle is happy to go there as we would have Hodgson and Simpkins there as back up and development. It would work out well for all parties involved
 
@russell said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497981) said:
@tiger_scott said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1497975) said:
Mole article also saying Canberra want Liddle for Hodson. Maybe we do a player swap again? We cover the disparity in salaries, they get Liddle for a year and we get Hodson. Both sides can reassess after the year, whether to go again with the same arrangement or swap back.

Interesting they didn't want Simpkin.

Quick hit those dislike buttons!!!!!!

It's because they have Starling and only want a Reserve hooker
 
@hsvjones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1498045) said:
@THE_POM was saying we had a 2 year deal ready for Hodgson but not sure if we have actually given it to them or not ? Than you add the police troubles for there current hooker and it doesn't look good. For me if they want Liddle its a no Brainer if Liddle is happy to go there as we would have Hodgson and Simpkins there as back up and development. It would work out well for all parties involved

We need to learn how to squeeze their canasta a bit harder, make them squeal, ( just like Gene Hackman in Mississippi Burning).
We have the upper hand, they want Hodgson gone and an idiot as backup.
 
@hsvjones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1498045) said:
@THE_POM was saying we had a 2 year deal ready for Hodgson but not sure if we have actually given it to them or not ? Than you add the police troubles for there current hooker and it doesn't look good. For me if they want Liddle its a no Brainer if Liddle is happy to go there as we would have Hodgson and Simpkins there as back up and development. It would work out well for all parties involved

Last I heard (a week ago) offer was on table and was up to Hodgson’s management and raiders to work out how much raiders would cover. The issues with Starling will not effect this deal at all but raiders not paying enough might
 
Devastating news for @Geo

His 2nd favourite player

https://www.msn.com/en-au/sport/more-sports/cowboys-coup-days-before-key-signing-deadline/ar-AAPUYXD?ocid=ASUDHP&li=AAgfLCP
 
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491017) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491015) said:
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491010) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491009) said:
@yeahcaz said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491006) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491002) said:
@jai_donaldson said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490997) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490987) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490981) said:
@yeahcaz said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490975) said:
It’s no surprise all the usual culprits are bagging the Hodgson signing. We have no leaders, simple as that. Liddle is bog average and has clearly been told he’s not apart of this clubs long term ambitions, further emphasised by Simpkins long term contract. Hodgson for 2 years is the ideal mentor for Simpkin and at no real damage to the salary cap.

I am happy to be lumped with the "usual suspects" if it means thinking signing a 32 year old, hot off the worst season he has had in the NRL is a bad idea.

I thought as a supporter base, we were tired of signing all these over the 30 year olds. Yet the majority seemed enthusiastic about Peachy, and now there’s excitement about possibly signing Hodgson. In a position we have covered btw.

So many here complaining we haven't got any leadership, we lack experience and when a player with 270 games experience and a current test player for his nation is mentioned they crap the bed and say he's too old.

I know it may come as a shock, but not everyone here has the same opinion. It is possible to not have complained about the leadership and think Hodgson would be a dud signing.

So we don’t need leaders if they become available ?

We need quality, which the 2021 version of Hodgson is not

Who do you suggest?

It’s not up to me. The players we truly need wouldn’t even consider us

Exactly...

So welcome aboard ya new #9 and captain when its announced.

And maybe by round 10 when everyone is saying he's garbage and slow, you can partake in your favourite posting and be contrary and say the opposite?

Who on earth wants Josh Hodgson now?
Sure last year, maybe.
This year where the faster pace has shown him to be not competitive and dead cap wood.

You could hire him for cheap as a NR9 coach. But what of Robbie Farah? Really is it worth wasting Cap space for Josh?

I dont get it. Yes Raid the Raiders. We need forwards and defense and they have that in spades. But not a 32 year old Hooker, Liddle is om good cap money he needs to perform or out he goes.
 
@crazycat said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1498062) said:
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491017) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491015) said:
@demps said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491010) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491009) said:
@yeahcaz said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491006) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1491002) said:
@jai_donaldson said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490997) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490987) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490981) said:
@yeahcaz said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1490975) said:
It’s no surprise all the usual culprits are bagging the Hodgson signing. We have no leaders, simple as that. Liddle is bog average and has clearly been told he’s not apart of this clubs long term ambitions, further emphasised by Simpkins long term contract. Hodgson for 2 years is the ideal mentor for Simpkin and at no real damage to the salary cap.

I am happy to be lumped with the "usual suspects" if it means thinking signing a 32 year old, hot off the worst season he has had in the NRL is a bad idea.

I thought as a supporter base, we were tired of signing all these over the 30 year olds. Yet the majority seemed enthusiastic about Peachy, and now there’s excitement about possibly signing Hodgson. In a position we have covered btw.

So many here complaining we haven't got any leadership, we lack experience and when a player with 270 games experience and a current test player for his nation is mentioned they crap the bed and say he's too old.

I know it may come as a shock, but not everyone here has the same opinion. It is possible to not have complained about the leadership and think Hodgson would be a dud signing.

So we don’t need leaders if they become available ?

We need quality, which the 2021 version of Hodgson is not

Who do you suggest?

It’s not up to me. The players we truly need wouldn’t even consider us

Exactly...

So welcome aboard ya new #9 and captain when its announced.

And maybe by round 10 when everyone is saying he's garbage and slow, you can partake in your favourite posting and be contrary and say the opposite?

Who on earth wants Josh Hodgson now?
Sure last year, maybe.
This year where the faster pace has shown him to be not competitive and dead cap wood.

You could hire him for cheap as a NR9 coach. But what of Robbie Farah? Really is it worth wasting Cap space for Josh?

I dont get it. Yes Raid the Raiders. We need forwards and defense and they have that in spades. But not a 32 year old Hooker, Liddle is om good cap money he needs to perform or out he goes.

I think it’s an admission that Simpkin is not ready , and liddle isn’t an 80 min player . I honestly don’t see the issue if it’s 400-500k for 2 years . It allows Simpkin to really hone his craft for the magpies , and Liddle to not have the responsibility of being the number 1 choice . Perfect world , Liddle has a career path that’s similar to Cook , where he doesn’t establish himself until his mid 20s , which is right in line with Hodgson finishing up .
And if he’s garbage ? There will always be a super league team willing to pay for the current English number 9 .
It’s a no brainer really . But each to thier own . I understand why your not pumped about it .
 
@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1498072) said:
4 days til Nov 1,

I hope the recruitment team have their hit list and are primed.

You’re preparing yourself for a let down
 

Latest posts

Back
Top