jirskyr
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 13,875
Of course it is, that's exactly what it is.Come on Jirskyr, I don't think you are reading my posts. I would not have bias against the team I wanted to win. So in those cases, where the ref is showing bias for the team I want to win, it is probably not my bias seeing only what I want to see.
So by some mechanism the refs favour the teams you want to win, bias towards those teams you are backing, except when it's Tigers. Only happens in the wrong direction when you want Tigers to win.
It doesn't matter whether it's positive or negative bias towards TEAM X (whatever team), you are providing an anecdotal summary of a subset of games, recalled from memory and without verifiable data, and ignoring all the matches where the criteria you speak of don't exist (where you aren't backing any particular side).
What you are talking about doesn't really exist, but you are seeing things in results because you have an emotional investment in the outcome.