It is very interesting reading the responses from the media story. Perhaps it is worthwhile to mention a few facts:
1) Ivan is at the start of a rebuilding process. Although his record is good, realistically, he hasn't achieved anything as yet at the Tigers. In an interview, he said we are a 3-5 year project, I believe the Broncos will want a top coach with a recent, proven track record. They were recently after Bellamy and I feel there is a bit of a gap between Bellamy and Cleary given their records.
\
\
2) To my mind, Nathan Cleary is still a _potential_ superstar. He hasn't really owned the competition and by his own admission is still coming to grips with the origin arena. There have been many that have shown star potential at an early age and plateaued. For halfbacks I would say Brett Finch, Pearce and even our own Brooks are examples of this. Very good first grade players but not JT or Johns.
\
\
3) Package deals like this can end in tears. As we know, coaches come and go and having your marquee player the son of the coach could be risky if sustained success is not forthcoming. Especially at a place like the Broncos who expect to win.
There may be some truth to the rumour however I think It is a substantial gamble on the Bronco's behalf to sign them both given that they still have a bit to prove.
This! Smartest thing I’ve read here for a while.
Agree particularly on Nathan Cleary. He is a good player, but he hasn't shown that much. Keep in mind he plays behind perhaps the most dominating forward pack in the competition as well. I don't think he is close to anywhere near the $1m dollar mark we, and other clubs will throw at him. How would he go behind a ordinary pack? On the contrary, how would Brooks go behind that flourishing pack at Penrith? Brooks could be world class for all we know.