gallagher
Well-known member
Transit lounge
Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion
- Thread starter MacDougall
- Start date
@ said:
We don't have to pay anything if McQueen asks for a release..
JD Tiger
New member
@ said:
Wow, if true, IC has his finger on the pulse like no coach ever before at the WT.
Doubt it personally is true though, McQueen signed for another two years at WT I believe (or was it three) and I don't think Titans would take him back for another 2 years considering his injuries/form have kept him to Reserve Grade all year.
swag_tiger
Well-known member
@ said:
If he can get back to his Penrith days it can be a decent signing.
HabboTiger
Well-known member
Good swap.
AL The Tiger
Well-known member
Leilani Latu for McQueen? Yes please
@ said:
Good swap. Rated him at Penrith.
@ said:
Listen up, it's not brain surgery.
If a player requests a release from his contract, a club can refuse his request and continue to pay said player.
If the club grants his request the players contract is null and void ie there is no longer a contract.
Therefore as there is no contract between the club and the player there is no obligation to pay said player any money.
Get it?
:brick: :brick:
There is risk. It doesn’t sound like his able to do enough to get back into the squad.
The question is with both players yet to again play to their potential.
What does the squad need more for next year?
A worker backrower, impact not their strongest suit, defends and can run lines well
Or
A very skilful ball playing prop whom probably isn’t the fittest or toughest going around.
We are not getting a line busting impact player from either.
The question is with both players yet to again play to their potential.
What does the squad need more for next year?
A worker backrower, impact not their strongest suit, defends and can run lines well
Or
A very skilful ball playing prop whom probably isn’t the fittest or toughest going around.
We are not getting a line busting impact player from either.
Tim Sheens
Well-known member
Listening up the post sounded familiar, but failed to tell us plebs we have a genius amongst us.
Tim Sheens
Well-known member
@ said:
Someone just doesn't seem to get it, but it's not rocket science :slight_smile:
gallagher
Well-known member
Some bloke in reserve grade who looked ok a few years ago.
Why am I not excited?
Why am I not excited?
@ said:
Ah, but my point not in regards to moving a player on but when a player looks to move on.
Like Adam Blair with us.
If the process that takes place is for the player to approach the club seeking a release and the club granting it thus ends the current contract with the club.
Why should it matter where or how the player is going to the next club?
His current contract is finished.
Why would any club agree to pay any money once they have already closed the contract.
The process contradicts itself.
The player leaving obviously has something lined up or in the Panthers and Sharks case, the clubs obviously have something lined up.
So why does an official release from the current contract need to be granted? Why can’t a contract be transferred to the new club removing the amount from the old clubs cap and adding it onto the new clubs cap?
And why did we pay part of Blair’s salary for 2 years????
