happy_tiger
Well-known member
Thank god we aren't arguing how wonderful Brooks ...Hastings ...AD are again
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wish we could, but sadly...Thank god we aren't arguing how wonderful Brooks ...Hastings ...AD are again
Nope.I'm very confused by these comments. Were you not, in the previous post, saying that legal action would have set a tone of management supporting the players and we should have in fact "kicked stones"?
They were combos getting to know each other, trying plays & it was beginning to gel. Beating top teams by a point is belief. Don't stop trying.Sure but even that only takes him to 5 wins from 16 appearances. That’s not even 33%. He played halfback when we scored 12 points in three games against Manly, Canterbury and the Warriors.
But we don’t spent , check that outBuT Wer'E one oF ThE few ClubS tHaT mAkE a pRoFit
I guess what you’re saying is Maguire was the problem and regardless of what we do, victory/improvement is ours now that we’re rid of the problem?I suppose it comes down to the interpretation of success. How many finals series Tiges in since 2005? And consecutive finals series? Maguire was there for 3 years and each year worse than the previous. I don't think anyone expects immediate success, but definitely improvement season upon season, and consistency
Even if here was a powerhouse, he couldn't do it by himself. There were limitations around him. There isn't any quality halfbacks on the market, at least none to replace him, and to swap him for an ageing forward just doesn't make senseAgreed. I personally like Hastings but we were hardly a powerhouse when he played. Overall we nudged up from abysmal to woeful when he played.
You're making an assumption and it's incorrect. Victory/improvement will be expected from the next coach. Coaches live and die by the results sword. It was not entirely his fault but 3 increasingly bad season results aint gonna hold you in good stead. Focussed on winning he might have been but it did not translate to winsI guess what you’re saying is Maguire was the problem and regardless of what we do, victory/improvement is ours now that we’re rid of the problem?
I think there are more important elements to goal setting than simply removing impediments. Assuming Madge was the reason for our poor performance. It doesn’t make sense to me, because he always seemed more focussed on winning than anybody?
This was in tandem. Give Madge the credit he deserves.The two big signings did not get over the line until Sheens was on board. Madge couldn't land anyone until Sheens arrived
Good player but he is just no Luke BrooksI liked Hastings as a player - I’m just pointing out the facts.
Which game was that?I'm sure they might have made peace these days but Heino's position was untenable at the Tigers. Robbie at the time could not forgive Heino for not diving on the ball in the final against the Roosters. He refused to ever talk to him again. My source on this is solid.
I think your post points to the importance of who owns the money which is invested, not necessarily how much is invested in any particular club?I think u are putting to much into this culture and structure thing , so let’s look at the most successful clubs over the last 5-10 years , I would say there’s 4 or 5
Melbourne
Rooters
South’s
Penrith
So let’s break it down on these 4
Well the 1st thing is they are all owned or backed by single owners , which means they are able to entice the best juniors or the best up and comers as well as keeping the best players on lower contracts , they have the best coaches and I am sure the best back room staff . So when u compare this to the English premier soccer , look who dominates there competition, Manchester city , Chelsea , Liverpool, these clubs owned by single or very rich groups, WELL can u see the same pattern to our league , so culture and structure I think comes down to MONEY, MONEY and more MONEY, because all clubs try there best for that same culture , so it all comes down to how much money u can put into it .
We haven’t seen finals footy in 10 years. We know what failure is, but how do we know if we’re winning? Sheens got sacked because we missed the finals, if we miss the finals in 23 will he get sacked again?You're making an assumption and it's incorrect. Victory/improvement will be expected from the next coach. Coaches live and die by the results sword. It was not entirely his fault but 3 increasingly bad season results aint gonna hold you in good stead. Focussed on winning he might have been but it did not translate to wins
We haven’t seen finals footy in 10 years. We know what failure is, but how do we know if we’re winning? Sheens got sacked because we missed the finals, if we miss the finals in 23 will he get sacked again?
We’re always talking about a coach’s poor performance being the final nail in his coffin. If it was simply a jump up the ladder each season then no coach would survive? What will happen to Cleary if Panthers run 3rd in 23?
wait: "We were offered state of the art facilities at the same time as Penrith and other clubs but refused for what ever reason, now we are all for the idea of a CoE?"I don’t know that they’re that bad that they need to copy other successful clubs? It’s not rocket science? From the outside it looks like we’re continually throwing up ideas, new things to try, new 3 year plans. It’s a sign of lack of stability. As an example, every so often we have a focus on winning the Flegg, but why hasn’t that been a focus from day one? We were offered state of the art facilities at the same time as Penrith and other clubs but refused for what ever reason, now we are all for the idea of a CoE?
If there’s one thing they can garner from successful clubs it’s buried in words like “have a long term plan” “stick to the plan” “have direction” regardless of who leaves or joins the club.