Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

The door is still half closed and half open so the press will not let go. From where i sit I hope he stays put, there will be some quality players hit the market at the end of the month, so its time for some patience. Of course I would take him in a flash, but I think he will stay and that would be a good out come
 
Marsters on 120k per year and match payments. Think we need to look at upgrading and extending quickly
 
@ said:
Marsters on 120k per year and match payments. Think we need to look at upgrading and extending quickly

If correct, in most cases this is what successful clubs pay emerging talent. Value for money.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Moylan might be alright if he wants to play reggies.

No spot for him in FG at the moment.

Nah no spot for a guy who is better then Lolohea, Reynolds and Brooks combined.

In your opinion ?????

Not in mine - the guy is a dope, a disruption to teams, not well liked it would seem so…

basically IMO another Moses and Hayne type.

I don't know for sure that Moylan is like that but I don't want to have players in our team who are disloyal scabs. We've just been absolutely killed by 3 players like that and is Moylan worth taking on that risk.

I suppose on fair dollars he would be a good option but I assume some club will pay overs.
 
I know that we have 2 seats left on the bus, does anyone know or have any idea on how much money is left in the cap for those 2 spots?
 
@ said:
Warriors forum reporting Blair and Beale to Warriors. Blair on 4 years.

4 years for Blair? He'll be 32 next by the time next season starts. And people thought Taylor was bad. He had nothing on Kearney. Absolute space cadet.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Warriors forum reporting Blair and Beale to Warriors. Blair on 4 years.

4 years for Blair? He'll be 32 next by the time next season starts. And people thought Taylor was bad. He had nothing on Kearney. Absolute space cadet.

Gerald Beale is a good signing, but depends on how much.

Blair on 4 years is INSANE. Unless the Warriors are thinking that they can get Blair for 2 more years and have him retire from injury. But that is either a risky gamble or absolute space cadet thinking. Blair will suit Kearney's plan and the playing style he wants, but if Kearney leaves then NZ have a 500k+ pet rock playing for their team.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Warriors forum reporting Blair and Beale to Warriors. Blair on 4 years.

4 years for Blair? He'll be 32 next by the time next season starts. And people thought Taylor was bad. He had nothing on Kearney. Absolute space cadet.

The battling clubs have to offer long deals to attract players. Likes us with McQueen,Reynolds and co, I bet the club would loved to have locked in two year deals with a 1 year option in the clubs favour, but to get the signatures they have to give them long deals. If you don't do it another club will.
 
@ said:
@ said:
Marsters on 120k per year and match payments. Think we need to look at upgrading and extending quickly

If correct, in most cases this is what successful clubs pay emerging talent. Value for money.

Apparently this is the cap management that the Roosters use, their stars get top dollar while their up and coming players get a small salary.
Their cap manager stated that if you pay your average players big money they think that they are stars, and don't have to improve.
If you pay them basic salary they work their butts off to get a big contract.
That's why players like Watson was on a small salary, and they would have a lot more players on the same as Watson.
Don't forget the brown paper bags!
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Marsters on 120k per year and match payments. Think we need to look at upgrading and extending quickly

If correct, in most cases this is what successful clubs pay emerging talent. Value for money.

Apparently this is the cap management that the Roosters use, their stars get top dollar while their up and coming players get a small salary.
Their cap manager stated that if you pay your average players big money they think that they are stars, and don't have to improve.
If you pay them basic salary they work their butts off to get a big contract.
That's why players like Watson was on a small salary, and they would have a lot more players on the same as Watson.
Don't forget the brown paper bags!

"Their cap manager stated that if you pay your average players big money they think that they are stars, and don't have to improve."

Bingo. We spoilt Tedesco, Moses and Brooks because we wanted to keep our spine… Hence we got a crap spine.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Marsters on 120k per year and match payments. Think we need to look at upgrading and extending quickly

If correct, in most cases this is what successful clubs pay emerging talent. Value for money.

Apparently this is the cap management that the Roosters use, their stars get top dollar while their up and coming players get a small salary.
Their cap manager stated that if you pay your average players big money they think that they are stars, and don't have to improve.
If you pay them basic salary they work their butts off to get a big contract.
That's why players like Watson was on a small salary, and they would have a lot more players on the same as Watson.
Don't forget the brown paper bags!

"Their cap manager stated that if you pay your average players big money they think that they are stars, and don't have to improve."

Bingo. We spoilt Tedesco, Moses and Brooks because we wanted to keep our spine… Hence we got a crap spine.

they werent that crap.. woods, moses and tedesco have probably been our best player for the last 2-3 years.
 
@ said:
I know that we have 2 seats left on the bus, does anyone know or have any idea on how much money is left in the cap for those 2 spots?

Roughly 700K in a 9.4Mill Cap..
 
We do have 2 spots left on the bus but then it's also possible someone like JJ Felise might seek a release for more opportunities elsewhere, hence opening up another spot and freeing up a bit more money.

He's fallen down the pecking order and would be behind Matulino, Packer, Twal, Sue, Eisenhuth.
 
Looking ahead - we'll have 7 players off contract for 2018
JJ Felise, Tim Grant, Benji Marshall, Esan Marsters, Kevin Naiqama, Sauaso Sue, Malakai Watene-Zelezniak
Via ZeroTackle
 
@ said:
Looking ahead - we'll have 7 players off contract for 2018
JJ Felise, Tim Grant, Benji Marshall, Esan Marsters, Kevin Naiqama, Sauaso Sue, Malakai Watene-Zelezniak
Via ZeroTackle

With the exception of Marsters, all are expendable. Even my man crush Jesse. I think we'll be active again in the market for 2019.
 
@ said:
Moylan might be alright if he wants to play reggies.

No spot for him in FG at the moment.

Yeah, we've got so many top quality players on board , that we don't need a player that has proved he can break a team open. Not the worlds No1 player. But certainly on another level to anyone we've bought so far.
I think it's all just wishful thinking though, I can't see Gus letting him get away,
 
@ said:
@ said:
Looking ahead - we'll have 7 players off contract for 2018
JJ Felise, Tim Grant, Benji Marshall, Esan Marsters, Kevin Naiqama, Sauaso Sue, Malakai Watene-Zelezniak
Via ZeroTackle

With the exception of Marsters, all are expendable. Even my man crush Jesse. I think we'll be active again in the market for 2019.

Actually think we are in a great position for once. I agree that all of these players, with the exception of Marsters, are the ones we will be wanting to trade out of. We weren't able to perform a complete clean-out and roster upgrade in one go with the restraints of the salary cap, so we will spread it out over the 2 years and by 2019 with some further quality purchases we should have a pretty decent 30 man squad. I reckon Benji will end up in some football related roll at the Tigers after next year.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top