avocadoontoast
Well-known member
@earl said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1421007) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1420991) said:@earl said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1420972) said:@tcat said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1420970) said:@jadtiger said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1420954) said:@magpie_mick said in [Pangai Junior](/post/1420845) said:My guess is TPJ has chosen the Bulldogs because they are prepared to pay more
That is the correct answer and when their policy fails again next year they will be in an even deeper hole at the end of 2022 with more years of pain ahead of them.
Or if it pays off, they will be laughing their back into the top 8. Every club has a strategy and its clear what's dogs is. Ours seems like a abit harder to read, other than refusing to pay overs anymore. One day we are going to have to bite the bullet and have fork out some doe or else our only hope is Junior talent which has its risks also.
I don't think we have to change strategy. I also think our recruitment strategy has been pretty good. I also don't think missing out on marquee players at TPJ's level is going to hurt us.
I think the signing that hurt us the most missing out on was Latrell. He is a weapon. That is what we need. We need a top marquee player or we have to play money ball.
The issue with moneyball is it's never actually won anything. The A's have been doing it for 20 years and they've not won the world series, even though they've outperformed relative to their roster spend. It's a good way to bridge some of the gap in a comp without a salary cap, but a sabermetric approach in a defined salary cap comp like the NRL has its limitations imo.
I think it's our only option. You may have to pay marquee dollars every so often to retain or attract talent but the opposite approach will always fail. You get players like Reynolds, Packer and Mbye and they kill your club.
If you waste your marquee dollars as we have you basically lower your chances of success significantly until you can unwind those contracts.
I like the Dogs signings for instance. They could come good. The problem is if some of those top dollar signings don't perform they will be in big trouble.
You are correct, but at this stage we'll be in trouble no matter what. I have no issues paying overs for certain players, we're in a position where we have to. It has to be the right players though. Paying overs for someone like Brandon Smith would be an absolute no brainer. Strengthens a position on the field and adds so much off it.
I have no issue with targeting the best youngsters, but there needs to be other good signings to complement them. They can't do it on their own.