pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
For all WTs' supporters, do not read this thread unless you have liquid tranquiliser available. No I do not know a Dr who would be prepared to prescribe it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244347) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244335) said:Paps was let go before Tedesco was leaving wasn't he?
I don't think anyone would have picked Paps over Tedesco then.
Why did it have to be a choice?
Those who were paid to position the Club to achieve the best results should have ensured our fall back option was secured ie that Papenhuyzen was contracted to WTs.
@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244372) said:We have lets lots of players go who go on to better things
This was a massive blunder. I mean LM was SG Ball player of the year, Papenhuyzen HM player of the year and many junior rep teams. The top clubs rarely lose vgood young players.
LM ...sorry ..who at the Tigers is / was LM
Lattrell Mitchell fullback and SG Ball player of the year. Papenhuyzen fullback and HM player of the year.
@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244393) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244372) said:We have lets lots of players go who go on to better things
This was a massive blunder. I mean LM was SG Ball player of the year, Papenhuyzen HM player of the year and many junior rep teams. The top clubs rarely lose vgood young players.
LM ...sorry ..who at the Tigers is / was LM
Lattrell Mitchell fullback and SG Ball player of the year. Papenhuyzen fullback and HM player of the year.
Surely you are aware that "POTY" awards are not a particularly good argument regarding player retention. In a 10 minute search effort I found several seasons of the last 20 years, where the POTY was released by his FG side, or more often than not, didn't even make a dent in first grade.
2003
SG Ball Player of the Year - Adam Whitelaw, Canterbury Bulldogs
Jersey Flegg Player of the Year - Issac de Gois , Western Suburbs
2006
2006 Harold Matthews Player of the Year was presented to Bradley Murray (Canterbury Bulldogs)
2006 S G Ball Player of the Year was presented to Michael Jennings (Penrith Panthers)
2007
Matthew Wright - Harold Matthews
Lachlan Coote - SG Ball
2008
Vaipuna Tia Kilifi (Penrith, Harold Matthews)
Tim Auremi (Parramatta, SG Ball)
2011
TOM ROUSE - SG Ball
2012
Harold Matthews Player of the Year - Soni Hala (Penrith Panthers)
SG Ball Player of the Year - Mitchell Moses (Balmain)
2015
Fine Kula - Harold Matts
Tom Starling - SG Ball
@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244397) said:Well Mitchell and Papenhuyzen are pretty average players. Try again.
@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244392) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244347) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244335) said:Paps was let go before Tedesco was leaving wasn't he?
I don't think anyone would have picked Paps over Tedesco then.
Why did it have to be a choice?
Those who were paid to position the Club to achieve the best results should have ensured our fall back option was secured ie that Papenhuyzen was contracted to WTs.
I'd assume Paps didn't want to sit behind Tedesco. You have to remember at the time, Teddy was our future.
@ElleryHanley said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244401) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244392) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244347) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244335) said:Paps was let go before Tedesco was leaving wasn't he?
I don't think anyone would have picked Paps over Tedesco then.
Why did it have to be a choice?
Those who were paid to position the Club to achieve the best results should have ensured our fall back option was secured ie that Papenhuyzen was contracted to WTs.
I'd assume Paps didn't want to sit behind Tedesco. You have to remember at the time, Teddy was our future.
Everyone seems to have gotten away from the original post...Kelly Egan decided to not retain Paps as he was injury prone.
The whole point of the post was to dispel the Tedesco stuff. Chaamas has come out and said Paps was not wanted by Egan.
@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244404) said:Why are we rehashing this topic? It's done to death. Paps took an equivalent offer from Storm to play under Slater and Bellamy, and to get out from behind Tedesco. He is quoted directly about this decision. Tigers matched the Storm offer and Paps decided to leave.
Whatever the exact and most important reasons that he left, it cannot be argued that Tigers had a million-dollar offer on the games' emerging #1 fullback. It also cannot be argued that Storm have and continue to have now the games' most influential (a) player and (b) coach.
Maybe Kelly Egan is/was a complete and utter incompetent moron. Who cares, what more can we do given he's already left the club? Sack him in retrospect? Maybe it would have helped Kelly out if Tigers had the all-time greatest coach going around, to sweeten deals.
@Cultured_Bogan said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244408) said:@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244404) said:Why are we rehashing this topic? It's done to death. Paps took an equivalent offer from Storm to play under Slater and Bellamy, and to get out from behind Tedesco. He is quoted directly about this decision. Tigers matched the Storm offer and Paps decided to leave.
Whatever the exact and most important reasons that he left, it cannot be argued that Tigers had a million-dollar offer on the games' emerging #1 fullback. It also cannot be argued that Storm have and continue to have now the games' most influential (a) player and (b) coach.
Maybe Kelly Egan is/was a complete and utter incompetent moron. Who cares, what more can we do given he's already left the club? Sack him in retrospect? Maybe it would have helped Kelly out if Tigers had the all-time greatest coach going around, to sweeten deals.
No, we must debate this until the end of time.
@Cultured_Bogan said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244408) said:@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244404) said:Why are we rehashing this topic? It's done to death. Paps took an equivalent offer from Storm to play under Slater and Bellamy, and to get out from behind Tedesco. He is quoted directly about this decision. Tigers matched the Storm offer and Paps decided to leave.
Whatever the exact and most important reasons that he left, it cannot be argued that Tigers had a million-dollar offer on the games' emerging #1 fullback. It also cannot be argued that Storm have and continue to have now the games' most influential (a) player and (b) coach.
Maybe Kelly Egan is/was a complete and utter incompetent moron. Who cares, what more can we do given he's already left the club? Sack him in retrospect? Maybe it would have helped Kelly out if Tigers had the all-time greatest coach going around, to sweeten deals.
No, we must debate this until the end of time.
@mike said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244412) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244408) said:@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244404) said:Why are we rehashing this topic? It's done to death. Paps took an equivalent offer from Storm to play under Slater and Bellamy, and to get out from behind Tedesco. He is quoted directly about this decision. Tigers matched the Storm offer and Paps decided to leave.
Whatever the exact and most important reasons that he left, it cannot be argued that Tigers had a million-dollar offer on the games' emerging #1 fullback. It also cannot be argued that Storm have and continue to have now the games' most influential (a) player and (b) coach.
Maybe Kelly Egan is/was a complete and utter incompetent moron. Who cares, what more can we do given he's already left the club? Sack him in retrospect? Maybe it would have helped Kelly out if Tigers had the all-time greatest coach going around, to sweeten deals.
No, we must debate this until the end of time.
Or at least until we win the premiership again.
@Harvey said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244417) said:I don't remember too many people bleating about losing him when he left, or when he did not play a game in his first few years at the storm.
No one was suggesting a big money contract be offered when the storm were shopping him around at the start of last year.
When he left he was as big a loss as Jake Mullaney
@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244407) said:@ElleryHanley said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244401) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244392) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244347) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244335) said:Paps was let go before Tedesco was leaving wasn't he?
I don't think anyone would have picked Paps over Tedesco then.
Why did it have to be a choice?
Those who were paid to position the Club to achieve the best results should have ensured our fall back option was secured ie that Papenhuyzen was contracted to WTs.
I'd assume Paps didn't want to sit behind Tedesco. You have to remember at the time, Teddy was our future.
Everyone seems to have gotten away from the original post...Kelly Egan decided to not retain Paps as he was injury prone.
The whole point of the post was to dispel the Tedesco stuff. Chaamas has come out and said Paps was not wanted by Egan.
You are twisting the statement.
Firstly does Chammas actually direct-quote anyone? You did not link the article, I can't read to verify.
Secondly, Kelly Egan may well have believed Paps was too injury prone, but that is not the same as saying Tigers released him *because* he was too injury prone. That may have simply been Egan's sole opinion.
Papenhuyzen himself has been quoted very many times about why he left, I don't see the point of rehashing it to either bullet Jason Taylor or Kelly Egan or any other dude from the 2017 management.
@happy_tiger said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244375) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244372) said:@happy_tiger said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244371) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244368) said:@happy_tiger said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244355) said:I think if you go back and look at Egan's record it stands up pretty well
He was involved with the Cowboys junior recruitment from 2011 -2013 (2 years before their premiership ) , involved in coaching the Junior Kangaroos ......Manly as an assistant coach and then the Bulldogs before us
I don't care how good you are or are not ...but your not going to get every call right as far as junior recruitment /retention goes ..especially when you have a lot to choose from
Brisbane , Cowboys ,NZ , Newcastle ,Parra and Dogs have large pools of juniors to choose from and you could have 4-5 all in the same age group all as equally talented as each other
The case I use is Willie Carne ....known him for many years from being in the same class at IGS ....if you had told me he would have gone from the 2nd 15 at IGS to NRL player in 4 years I would have taken you to the nearest hospital to have your stomach pumped and stuck you in a drug dependency ward
We have lets lots of players go who go on to better things
This was a massive blunder. I mean LM was SG Ball player of the year, Papenhuyzen HM player of the year and many junior rep teams. The top clubs rarely lose vgood young players.
LM ...sorry ..who at the Tigers is / was LM
Lattrell Mitchell fullback and SG Ball player of the year. Papenhuyzen fullback and HM player of the year.
Roosters let him go ....
But look at Fifita ...we chose Groat and Woods over him
Roosters had 1st shot at Fifita as well ....
I'm off to work ...but I'll do a list tonight of the screw ups recruitment / retention calls
@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244398) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244397) said:Well Mitchell and Papenhuyzen are pretty average players. Try again.
That's two players mate. I just showed you, with no effort, 13 junior POTYs, of whom about 4 maybe 5 had decent but not stellar NRL FG careers. Tom Starling is still to be decided as he's young, and anyway he's at Raiders, not the Knights where he began.
You can cherry-pick any young kid from any rep side and try to make an argument for "why club X should have kept Player Y", but that's a stupid argument and ignores any of the real-life complexities about prioritising and retaining junior players.
@mike said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244412) said:@Cultured_Bogan said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244408) said:@jirskyr said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244404) said:Why are we rehashing this topic? It's done to death. Paps took an equivalent offer from Storm to play under Slater and Bellamy, and to get out from behind Tedesco. He is quoted directly about this decision. Tigers matched the Storm offer and Paps decided to leave.
Whatever the exact and most important reasons that he left, it cannot be argued that Tigers had a million-dollar offer on the games' emerging #1 fullback. It also cannot be argued that Storm have and continue to have now the games' most influential (a) player and (b) coach.
Maybe Kelly Egan is/was a complete and utter incompetent moron. Who cares, what more can we do given he's already left the club? Sack him in retrospect? Maybe it would have helped Kelly out if Tigers had the all-time greatest coach going around, to sweeten deals.
No, we must debate this until the end of time.
Or at least until we win the premiership again.
@ElleryHanley said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244401) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244392) said:@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244347) said:@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244335) said:Paps was let go before Tedesco was leaving wasn't he?
I don't think anyone would have picked Paps over Tedesco then.
Why did it have to be a choice?
Those who were paid to position the Club to achieve the best results should have ensured our fall back option was secured ie that Papenhuyzen was contracted to WTs.
I'd assume Paps didn't want to sit behind Tedesco. You have to remember at the time, Teddy was our future.
Everyone seems to have gotten away from the original post...Kelly Egan decided to not retain Paps as he was injury prone.
The whole point of the post was to dispel the Tedesco stuff. Chaamas has come out and said Paps was not wanted by Egan.