@ElleryHanley said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244401) said:
@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244392) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244347) said:
@Moh said in [The Papenhuyzen decision\.\.\.](/post/1244335) said:
Paps was let go before Tedesco was leaving wasn't he?
I don't think anyone would have picked Paps over Tedesco then.
Why did it have to be a choice?
Those who were paid to position the Club to achieve the best results should have ensured our fall back option was secured ie that Papenhuyzen was contracted to WTs.
I'd assume Paps didn't want to sit behind Tedesco. You have to remember at the time, Teddy was our future.
Everyone seems to have gotten away from the original post...Kelly Egan decided to not retain Paps as he was injury prone.
The whole point of the post was to dispel the Tedesco stuff. Chaamas has come out and said Paps was not wanted by Egan.
Thank you @ElleryHanley.
I for one support the angle of your post.
Whilst I won’t get drawn into the Kelly Egan was a terrible appointment arguement I do think it is worth having a discussion about the club at the time and the position it was in. Justin Pascoe, unfortunately for him is the common denominator in all of this. I’ll stand corrected if there are others involved in these decisions but I believe he was involved in the Kelly recruitment just like the Ivan Cleary recruitment.
But Just like then he was recently involved in the Madge and Hartigan recruitment.
Were the first two a rush of blood decision or were was it a case of getting the best available at the time.
I also remember Egan having a list of 3 potential halves partners for Brooks drawn up and mentioned in an interview at the time. Johnson, Widdop and Reynolds. Whilst the recruiting of the first two may have been more of a success they did knock us back and only Reynolds showed interest. What I can’t agree with is that with Widdop and Johnson both being the dominant playmaker of their teams, that Reynolds was bundled into the same category, Reynolds was not his teams ‘playmaker’ and couldn’t goal kick. And in my opinion would of been an astute signing on half his salary ‘without the benefit of hindsight, injuries etc’.
Instead the club throws the sink at him...
Who was responsible.
At the same time of the interview with Egan it was mentioned and confirmed by Pascoe that a recruitment and retention consortium was set up with Pascoe, Egan and Cleary all being involved in the decision making process.
Since we’ve fallen on our feet and found a favourable outcome with Madge. But since Madge’s inception, who made the decision that Egan was the scapegoat for all the past mistakes and commenced the recruitment of Hartigan?
As a side and back on to your topic specifically with Paps. In an interview at the time, to support but also lament Egans comments re Paps and his injury history. Melbourne it was mentioned flew Paps down whilst still contracted to us and paid for a consultation with a specialist for hamstring injuries. The extra attention to ensuring Paps was able to get the rehab he will require to build to a successful career is was pushed him into the storm corner.
I’ve heard similar stories re Tedesco and how the Roosters manage his Knee conditions.
Shows we have a big gap in making sure these players get the right attention they need off the field.
Another side note. Mikalee was the last player to be recruited through our Keebra Park connections prior to ceasing that relationship as a feeder club. I think their were a couple of others that came with him, Connelly Leumulu possibly but yeah have been moved on to other pastures.