Equal opportunity is not the same as equal outcome. "Minorities" today have systematic bias that preferences them over whites throughout most of the western world, that is they get greater opportunities because of their race in some vain attempt at altruism.
Societies accumulate wealth by capital, capital is not a number on a keyboard. It is industriousness, it is planning, communicating, organizing and doing. Machinery didn't spring out the ground, nor did knowledge.
Further more, equality of outcome does not exist, it never has at any significant level and it never will. Some blokes will save money to do greater things with it, other will blow it all on gambling and drugs. Some league players have all the natural talent in the world but no drive or commitment and fail at footy. Others appear to have little physical advantages but through dedication, commitment and intelligence make successful careers for themselves. Compare Brett Kimmorley to Owen Craigie.
The entire anti-racism movement has been used as a weapon. A weapon against social self interest, a weapon against labour organising against exploitation, a weapon against opposition of outsourcing and de-industrialisation. Take immigration for instance, each year western societies take millions of peoples from the third world, despite casualisation of the workforce, outsourcing, surging real estate prices, great social costs from overpopulation, unemployment, deindustrialisation, greater environment exploitation, homelessness. Australia's population is growing at a million every 3 or so years, that is another Adelaide's worth of people. If you legitimately question why we need to bring in more people (to undercut wages, and take on debt creating bubbles) then instantly out comes the 'that's racist' meme to shutdown any debate.
The shutdown of self interest of communities allows globalists to consolidate and accumulate power and wealth. London for instance has numerous billionaires and millionaires living there, it is a plaything for rich oil sheiks, russian oligarchs and city financiers. But at the same time the city's white british population has dropped below 50% and diverse communities such as the cockneys of the east end are nearing extinction. The trend repeats elsewhere. Local diversity destroys global diversity.
As for twerking, popculture is anti-culture. It is things that the corporations take, and then strip down into a simple marketable form in order to sell it to gullible impressionable youngsters. At a time where nuclear family groups are a rare phenomenon it becomes easy for youngsters to be influenced. It is not necessarily exploiting african americans, rather it is exploiting materialistic children. Any racist implications would be yourself projecting your own views and then double thinking because that would suggest you yourself are in fact "racist".
I'm rambling on of course, but additionally it should be noted upon the failures of 'anti-racism', 'diversification', 'equal opportunity', '"positive" discrimination' et al. None of these policies by the anti-racism industry have improved the plight of the average indigenous australian/america, or african american (and a fair few other groups). Instead they have raise welfare slaves who have had their social structures broken down and their work ethics destroyed to the point where some are no hopers who spend their time cruising around looking for people to beat up or shoot just for "fun". It has removed social accountability, and accountability to themselves. But the anti-racist activists get some perverse sense of false altruism, merely demonstrating vanity.
It is amazing to see some individuals preach on their high horse about the benefits of diversity et al and abuse the 'stupid bogans' (the ones who are already on the margins of society with low job security, rough neighbourhoods, substance dependencies, expensive cost of living, expensive housing, lack of community etc). Meanwhile often never spending a single minute around a refugee, aborigine or any other exhalted group to help, or to learn or to include into their lives.
I put a bit of hyperbole there, and it is indeed general because it is not simple to address the complexities in life and every single individual situation. Merely it is derived from what i see as the aggregate entirety. There are many issues and things that could be talked about but this thread is about a horribly out of touch performance by a deluded adolescent.
